Doc ID 6571846 i i - I I I Draft 3 - 9 10 5 a av-I I farm-f NSA MONITORIMG ISSUES i 5 Witnesses Relevant Documents General 8126 Authority Canabilities Allen - A Size - I l What'is FY 1975hbudget a REA SIGINT b EBA communications security 5 c Each Service Security Agency s budget - - Other Total i 7 s i 2 What is FY 1975Abudget a HSA SIGINT NSA communications securityeach SEEVICE Securic Agency's budget 1 EFifq a3 7 6 Other imw qe - of 3 51mm i a 3 Total Bahamas 191 I 365 3 - bases 'merl duh Of My Overseas Doc ID 6571846 i E Issues Witnesses 4 How much of FY_1975-buoget was expended on monitoring of Breakdown between voice and oon voioe oommunications and by functions a Intercepting b Storage analysis Dissemination d Total 5 How much of FY 1975 budget was expended on monitoring ILCs with one terminal in the United- States Breakdown between voice'and non voice com munications and by functions a Intercepting b Stotage analysis a Dissemination d Total VERY SENSITIVE Page ne-A Releyent Documents Doc ID 6571846 VERY SENSITIVE Witnesses Rhlevant Documents Issues Bn_ Authority for Functions Allen Banner 1 What statutor anthoritt Kern 1 'Moody 2 What Executive Branch directives a What are specific functions assigned to 1 What is meant by foreign communications 2 Is domestic law enforcement an authorized function Whnt T estrictions are placed on monitoring 1 of foreign communications 1 How define press broadcasts I 3 What restrictions does now impose on itself re - agerding the monitoring oi U S - At least one fofeign terminal Not specifically target U S citizens I b c Keen anonymity in dissemination of roduct regerd ins innidentel intersects of citizens 1 What specific rules exist now in what documents 2 What prior rules existed in 1970 1973 Doc ID 6571846 'Issues '3 Ix at 1 I 3 55 Him- 4 Jam- 3 4 a 3253 1 Ffi i- i Lids-a 239xM hzzajnitugm Witnesses Allen Buffham Capabilities 1 How intercept qumu ications a Telephone Line cable b _High-fr quency radio Micr wave d Satellite' 2 Who does intercepts a NSA itself bl Service Security Agencies Allies Detail not ne essary Others -Kern VERY SENSITIVE Rage T ree Rel vant Documents Doc ID 6571846 o -l - Inl11W nt Lt j L4 'gnfie -coiassn asizu seen 3 Issues Witnesses II Voice Intercepts Allen Kern A General 1 Total ILCs a How many voice links are used in inter- national lines of communications 3 b What kind of traffic is'osrried over these links voice facimiles c How much traffic is-cerried o number of telephone conversatiOns per month d How many of these links does NSA or someone working-with NSA monitor e How many voice communications do you estimete-Were intercepted in 1974 f How meny summaries or abstracts were forwarded to NSA headquarters in 1974 3 How much is sent to h How mooh_is disseminated to other agencies By types of dissemination - 1 i How much is retained by How 'Qiign 2 With one terminal-within the United_States I a How many of these voice links ere used in international Lines of communications b How much traffic is carried on these links number of telephone conversa- tions oer month VERY SENSITIVE Page Four Rerevant Documents 1 4- Doc ID 6571846 $31535 VERY SENSITIVE its L1 1333M New Page Five I I Issues Witnesses Relevant Documents c How many of these links does NSA Alien or someone working with NSA monitOr Kern Moody d How many voice communications do you - - estimate were intercepted in 1974 4 e How many summaries or abstracts were i I forwarded to NBA heaequarters in 19 4 How much is sent to NSA g How much is disseminated to other agencies How much is retained by How i What specific links does NSA or someone working with NSA now monitor From where For what reasons j k What specific links did NBA or_someone working with NSA monitor one year ago From where For what reasons m Has NSA ever monitored all Trans Atlantio - - - telephone calls Trans-Pacific ealls - - B U S South enerican telephone ealls Buffham Kern 1 Origin Moody i 3 new St - a When did the monitoring of these calls beginstarted other than at Sabana Seca in Puerto Rico when did the Sabana Seoa monitoring start Doc ID 6571846 -VERY SENSITIVE 3 age ix Issues - Witnesses Relevant Documents c Who prdposed it Buffham - Kern i d Who authorized it - I Moody e What iinks were initially monitored f What type of intercept equipment is 'used at sabana Seca for these calls 5 2 'Scope a Who submitted names b What were the procedures for submitting names Were names ever submitted by telephone If so how often d 'What justifications were reeuired from the sub mitting authorities - - e What was the total number of-U S citizens on the drug watch list f What was the highest number of U S citizens at any one time When was this g How man telenhoqe conversations were intercepted 3 Value a 'How much product was generated 1 In the beginning ' At the high point of monitoring a i Doc ID 6571846 IsSuas 3 In the years preceding termination i I How valuable was the product _izures pf drugs can be dizectly linked to it 1 How many se 2 _How many convictions f6 drug smuggling-of For igners U S citiz ns ' gran mg 51 2 3 533 - -3 1 glisi '1 33 Witnesses Buffham Kern Heady Banner - VERY-SENSITIVE Pag Seven Relevant Document I Doc ID 6571846 on Issues 5 6 etc at Sabana Sena r Why did NSA continue to monitor the New - VERY SENSITIVE Page Eight Witnesses 'Relevant Documents Buffham Kern Moody Banner g If so with what conclusions ' Why Termination of drug watch list a When did NSA discontinue its drug watch list activity b 'Why 0 Who in NSA decided to terminate the ao tivity Who was consulted before the deci sion -H Director Deputy Director Continued monitoring of It I York Montevideo link at Sabana Secs after termination of the drug Watch listWhat other voice links with one PL 86-36 50 USC 3605 terminal continued to be monitored at - Sebana Secs c- What were the results of continued monitoring 'i 1 Amount of product 2 Number of prosecutions Other information d When was this monitoring terminatedilf A l 1 Doc ID 6571846 I 1 VERY SENSITIVE 1e 3 Eage Nine 3 7 4 Issues Witnesses '1 Relevant Documents - e By whom E For whet reasons Does NSA hate any formal policy that would prohibit reSumption of this a South American monitoring If So what is 1 the policy and in what documents is it stated i - 7 Destruction of files Were the watch list product and other documents about this activity destroyed When Q Who authoriZed it when did the Director_ and Deputy Director become knowledgeable d Why the destruction $1 5 I oclI 6571846 I I I VERY SENSITIVE - r- 13 wg h xf a TQIFOMTMT 1 r L3 Li M s sya 3 53 age Ten k- I 9 11 3 xvii-U- Issues - Witnesses Relevant'Documents - Non-Voice Intercepts I - 2 Allen - - - Kern I 5 A General capabilities - _15 Total international lines of communica- tions How many non voice links are used in international lines of communication What kind of traffic is carried over these links- telexes computer data 5 o How much traffic is carried on these - 1 '1inks number of telexes per monthHow manv international links are monir tored e How much international non voice traffic does NSA or someone working with NSA inter- cept in 19 4 f How much is forwarded to NBA headquarters in 1924 5 i - 3 How much is sentito NSA h How much is disseminated to other agencies By types of dissemination 1 How much is retained by How Doc ID 6571846 - - - an Watch Lists 35ng - - - 3 'f if Lu- a '43 44 5 - 1 LH I cL 24 l' I ILCs with one terminal ing nited States a How many of these nonrvoice links are used in international lines of communica tion b much traffic is carried on these links number of telexes per c _How many of these links dees MBA or someone working with NSA monitor d How much of this non1V0ice tfaffic does NSA intercept in 1974 - VERY SENSITIVE Page Eleven Witnesses Relevant Documents How much is forwarded headquarters e in'l974 How much is sent to SA enalyste How much is disseminated to other agencies By types of dissemination h Haw much is retained by Nse How Before October 19671 a Origin 1 When was the first watch list es- tablished anfham 1a 11- In wmnwa Lrir-u 4 Doc ID 6571846 Issues VERY SENSITIVE jl e Sher eacrn ii We 7 -d fee i ih eih Witnesses Relevant Documents' 2 -BY whom - Buffham- Kerne- For what purpese - Iredell 4 Were any Americans on chase-lists Who when Why were they put on these lists 6 Which agencies in submitting names for the watch li tsDIA Military Services Secret Service Treasury E State Department 'Bureau of NarcoticS and Dangerous Drugs bitei ouse State or local police NSA Office of Security Others - - Weemuii Vie emu Doc ID 6571846 Issues- 4 v t a b y mrrm - enemas In all -1 1 -3 Witnesses 7 Did the Director-Or_Deputy Dirac SBuffham tor know about these watch lists If - Kern so when Did they have te-approVe Iredell each name that was included Eaeh' American citizen that was included When did the Office of Seeurity first submit names 9 Were any names submitted by telephone Why there a rush By whom How many What names After Octbber 1967 and Before 1 July 1969 Buffham Kern was the Yarborough cable the first time Moody thathSA was tasked to place names of U S Iredell citizens and groups associated with black Yarboreush and antiwar movements on the watch list b Who authored General Carterfs lO Zl telegram reply to General Yarhoroughi What was included on the watch list as a result of Yarborough's telegram d% What other new measures if any were taken in response tq the Yarborough telegram e Did anyone in NBA communicate orally with Yarborough concerning the telegram If so what happened f Were there any meetings-Within NSA result- ing from the Yarborough cable - If so who was present What came out of these meetings VERY SENSITIVE Page l irteen Relevant Documents Ez-IEJ- bat we smasher g - - h Doc ID 6571846 I VERY SENSITIVE U- mi - 3 ks fry Page Fourteen - Issues Witnesses Relevant Documents - g Were there any meetings with other Buffham agencies as a result of the Yarborongh - Kern_ I cable If so who was present What - Moody came out of'those meetings Iredell Yarborough h Which agencies submitted names of U S citizens to the Watch list as a result of the Yarborough cable See list in Section 1 above page twelve Who had to approve the inclusion of thezname of any UJS citiZen The Director or Deputy'Director 3 Do you know what person or agency put - together the roughly-typed four-page memo randum in the watch list files k When was it prepared 1 'How was this memorandum used Were the names and organizations listed in the memo randum put-on the watch list Which onesWere any names submitted hf telephone Why By whom How many What were the i names When was the last time this happened ' 1 3 MINARET post 1 July 1969 Buffham Kern Charter Itedell Moody I Who prepared it Who suggested that it he prepared f-g-ahix 2 Who was consulted within Doc ID 6571846 Issues 3 cies b prod Hers 53 ties 6 7 2 bag 53 divawn 3 Who was consulted-from other agen or from the White House Who it within Who'approved it from other agen or from the White House What were the reasons for it Was the legality of the-intercept program questioned during this period If so by whom With what result -Why was the intercept program sud- denly considered so sensitive Targets not ex For eech of the illustrative amples Times Melntire Abernathy Witnesses_ Buffham Kern Iredell Moody 1 Why were these oommuniques i tercepted 2 Who submitted the requirements that re sulted in their interception How was the information used or di inated after interception 1 Scope Who submitted names888131- a I 1 L-H Higy-g I VERY SENSITIVE Ln-1 1 Page Fifteen' - Relevant Documents Doc ID 6571846 - - Issues 'Othets- I spa 3 7 9 as weMilitary Services -Seeret ServiCes Treasury State Department White House or State or local police NSA Offiee of Seoority What justifications were required from submitting anthorities 3 What were the procedures fox-sub mitting names 4 Were any names submitted by tele phone names Why By whom How many What 'i Overall Scope of Watch List a How many total entries of U S citizens were on the watch list from its start thro its termination What was the greatest number of U S citi- zens on the wateh-liSt at any one time ugh When - Witnesses Buffham Kern Iredell Moody 53 n a I VERY SENSITIVE Page Sixteen Relevant Documents 1 35 1- f a I l Md Im'h Doc ID 6571846 Issues VERY se as as $5 ES Em am 5' 5 Page Seventeen 'lyezreie Lray - Witnesses Relevant Documents c How much product was generated per 'Buffham month on average in 1971 l9 3 ' Kern Iredell 1 For NSA Moody 2 Disseminated to other agencies 3 Retained by d How valuable was the prsduct 1 Give two or three examples of its greatest value When did the Generai Counsel's Office Banner first become aware of the watch_list ac tivity What actions did it take Watch List Product a Collating intercepted materiel Kern -- Iredell 1 What criteria were used to de Moody cide which messages Were worth processing - -Were all hits procesSed and reportsatyped up on them If not -were there any key individuals'or groups about whom a transcript or gist was always -Brigade prepared C Who were they VenCeremOS assaimit ins - a 0 a u uua 5 U1 pkg- 11151 - Raul 1 Viki J Doc ID 6571846 aesteiis i et wii' VERY SENSITIVE L2 '25 39 553 i age Elg te'en Issues Witnesses Relevant Documents How was the biographic information Kern I obtained that was included on the Watch Iredell - 4 kt ft LL I list product Moody - gpbabi I I i Tracy - Who compile the footnotes Did NSA have biographic infor- mation for everyone on the watch list Did NSA also use the biographic information for individuals and groups mentioned in the messages who were not on the watch list - Did these include - Members of Congress Executive Branch officials Business persons 0 -- Professors Labbr leaders I Other radicals who were celebrities Any others a Did you also acquire information from I other agencies that was included on the i watch list product If so from which agen 5 cies About which individuals Doc ID 6571846 Issues - m -- h 1 2 l raga Exam tn p i 3315'DiSseminating the product 1 What criteria were used to decide which messages were dieseminated to which agencies In what different ways Was the in formation 3 Were ceiving a disseminated any agencies barred from re- certain type of material If so describe 4 Did any agencies not want to re ceive material on particular individuals- or groups If so describe 5 Why did you have to send out your 5 7 70 memorandUm requesting that all -agenoies reaffirm their interest in the watch list produot 6 Who suggested that memorandum Who approved that memorandum What was the response i was there any question of the product s utility at that time Termination a When did any official in the Department of Justice besides the FBI become aware that the names watch list reaction of Bus citizens were on the Mitchell How What was the Kern - Iredell Moody 'Bufi ham Kern Iredell Moody Banner Page Nineteen Relevant Documents LN I m' - A r 1lA klet v Yb r- uli hi li 1 1 A -J emu-gay Doc ID 6571846I E sefha 'ge n VERY SENSITIVE - - - 1 h- Page Twenty Issues - I Witnesses Relevant Documents b 'When did HSA stop putting U S names Buffhem except for the very limited 4 5 entries 'Kern from the Secret Service on the watch list _Iredell - Moody - c Why were the U S names so eliminated Banner - - - - 1 Who proposed it first v NSA _thei Department of Justice others 2 What legal issues and cases were involved d Who are the remaining U S citizens en- -tities on the watch list Who requested their inclusion - 7 File destruction a When were_the wetch list materials de stroyed For which years b why c Who authorized their destruction d Who was consulted When did the Di rector or Deputy Director know I i 5 Nam- tress Doc ID 6571846 A Issues VERY as - st ass 3332 i32 exiamss 1 Paee shanty One Iv Files on A Biographic_fi1es Were files maintained by on U S citizens When did this practice begin 4 5 Why was it ddne Criteria for inclusion of U S names How'many files on U S citizens were there at maximum oint Total over time 6 Specific names 1 a Members of Congress b Executive Branch officiais c PoliriCal activists 1 Left wing 2 Black Hews media persons e Professors f Business persons 3 Labor leaders 3 Relevant Documents Kern I dv Maw-7 Doom Doc ID 6571846 1 un Issues a n gwm gge 1-3 3 9-3 I'll q AMT 4 4 71 Witnesses h Celebrities movie Kern stars - Moody Tracy 1 Others Sources of materials on-citizens a Open sources newspapers b within NSA - SIGINT l a were any of these U S citi- zens commuhicetions intentionally intercepted by the Agency Watch_list _MINARET If not infentienal how 2 Office of Security background investigapions VERY SENSITIVE Page Twenty4Tw0' - Relevant-Doeuments NSA Office of Personnei c From agencies outside FBI i CIA I 3 Bra 4 Military Services Secret Service Treasury afah ui f 1axejezg -J-w Doc ID 6571846 at 6 7 Who bed State Department BNDD State or local-police access Withi NBA 1 2 33 Outside NSA 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 SIGIE Office of security Office of Personnel Others FBI CIA DIA Military services Secret SerJice Treasury State Department BNDD Civil Service Cbmmission White House at MSG WitneSses L53 -VERY SENSITIVE Page Twenty Three Relevant Documents mu kw Doc ID 6571846 Issues 1 2 3 'When did this practice begin 4 5 Witnesses 10 State or local law enforcement agencies ll Private patties Potential employers of former NSA personnel Others Qi fggiehese files still exist a When destroyed b Why destroyed c Who ordered destruction Who consulted -prior to destruction Organizations files Are they maintained on-U S orgahizations Have they been in the past 1 Why was it done Criteria for including specific U S or- ganizetions 6 How many files on U S organizations_at maximum point Total over time VERY SENSITIVE Page Twenty Four Relevant Documents Doc ID 6571846 7 - an 3 u- inf-J I 1 1 IsziWitnesses Kinds_ef U S orgeeizetiens included a Political parties Political groups Leftist I I Blaek c jCorporations Oil companies Exxon 2 Other companies Labot u ions - e Social clubs fraternities civic associah tions etc Sohrces of materials on organizations a Open sources newspapers b tom within SIGINT Were any'of these organizations' communications intentionally inter cepted by the Agency watch list VERY SENSITIVE Page Twenty Five Relevent Documents Doc ID 6571846 VERY SENSITIVE Page Twenty-81x 2' 1-1'1 3 - Issues Witnes es Relevant Documents If'not intentional how 2 Office of Security ground investigations 3 ffice-of Person ei c- From putside NBA 1 Federal agencies 2 State or local law Enforcement agencies 3 Ot ers - 9 Who had access 3 Within NSA - - I I - - 2 Office Of S curity Office of Per cnnel 4 Oth Doc ID 6571846 I yggy SENSITIVE - i Fage Twenty Seven Relevant Documents Issues I Titnes es b Outside 1 #31 i 2 CIA DIA 1 I Military Services I I 5 Secrgt Servic ireasury l 6 'State'Departm nt i State or lo al police 1 9 Private parties g J A COmpetitor-gorporatidn 10 W en are files destroyed a What reason for destruction I Who ordered-destruction Who was consulted prior to destrucgionin xv- m 1 5 w a Doc ID 6571846 1 5- to Hr 3 Luv 1 a I VERY SENSITIVE Page Twenty Eight genes - Witnesses -Relevent Documents Legal Authority I Banner - Allen House Testimony a Does HSA have a legislative charter 1at statutes - 1 133cn - - - - Banner Memorandum 2 18 S c -798 Divulgence of 3 18 U S C 952 Divulcence of foreign- i diplomats communications 3 - I 4 PL 38 290 Personnel security -5 Appropriations acts 2 a 18 U S C 2511 3 Omnibus Act's-national security proviso 7 Any othersBuffham Banner Memorand m 3 3 Do Executive Branch Directives proVLde Banner Kern Bartimo Memorandum - MOody a What does the technical and intelligence' information definition of COMIHT include 1 Military intelligence Political intelligence 3 International trade n3 Law enforcement collection - I wh n 3 Doc ID 6571846VERY SENSITIVE Egg fizz-r - rr t 1 wm h- r i xgr t Page Twenty-Nine i I i I e n i - Witnesses Relevant Documents If not justifv watch Enffham for Banner Kerns Moodv 5 'Others DCID 6 3 a Does the definition of foreign commu- nications permit NSA to monitor l --Communications between'a foreign citizen inside the U S and foreign citizen outside the product If not hoW'justify wetch list Arab student grouns Communications between a foreign citizen inside the U S and a U S citi zen outside the i 3 Communications between_a U S iti zen inside the U S Outside the and a foreign citizen If not how justify watch list product I Abernathy communications Houston Memorandum Banner Memorandum Bartimo Memorandum Prbduct Product 3 3b 1 Doc ID 6571846 VERY Ff --b In Page Thirty a Essues - - - Witnesses - Relevant Documents i I 4 Communications between a U S I Buffham f -- citizen inside the U S and a U S Banner t' citizen outside the Kerns I Moody - I not how justify watch Product - list product Dellinger to Dellinger Cleaver to Cleaver I '65 Communications between two foreign citizens both within the I i If so should the charter amended to eliminate this 3 - Communications between a U S eiti ZI r 5 Item and a foreign citizen both within the 11 3 - I If so should the chatter amended-to eliminate this a C Do statutory prohibitions on wiretapping apply I Banner - l I Omnibus Crime-Control and Safe Streets Aet 18 u_sIcI 2510 2520 of 1963 - I a General isSues I I f y 1 Does any or all of the communioa- I tions monitoring apparatus in the pos- it session or Control of the Naglonal Se - I - I entity Agency constitute an nelectronic I mechanical or other device as deflnEd - I y w 5 rs ha Doc ID 6571846 ssuese uems 43Lu - 1' voice communications Are the voice communications moniw dtored by NBA intercepted within the ' meaning of 2510 4 of the Act includ- ing the issue of whether they are aurally acguired in the following cases As- Sume in all cases that at least one tere minal of the'communicetion is located in the U S Where an NSA operator simply listens to Dart of the communica tion To all of it Where an NSA operator makes a summary or giSt of the con _versetion 0 Where all or-part of the com- munication is recorded of Where a gist of the communica tion is forwarded to NBA for analysis Where the recording of the com- - munication is forwarded to NSA for analysis Where a gist of the communica tion is forwarded to consumer agen cies by 3 Where a transcript of the come munication is forwarded to consumer Ln - $5 I'i t h i' VERY SENSITIVE Relevant Documents Doc ID 6571846I 1 I 5-3 3L issues Witnesses 2 For each of the above cases in which an interception has taken place within the definition of the Act is the interception willful within the meaning of 2511 of the Act wherei a U S name is keyword and that person is a party to the com mnnication A is keyword and that person is not a party to the communication but the communica- 'tion is nevertheless intercepted because the name is mentioned No U S name is keynord but a U S citizen is a party to the communication and the communica tion is intercepted because an- other keyword is mentioned No U S name is keyword and that person is not a party to the communication FEE theicommunica tion is nevertheless intercepted because another keyword is mentioned c Non voice communicationsE' Are the non voice com munications monitored by NSA intercepted within'the meaning of 2510 4 of the-Act in the following cases Assume in all cases that at least one terminal of the communicatiOn is in_the U S Address the issue of whether the communication is VERY SENSITIVE TSIQUMLNI $age Thirty Two Relevant Documents Doc ID 6571846 pf ESSUES IL toringmega - 13Witnes es Vacquired and whether the communication is acquired aurally - Where the communication is susceptible to comprehension through the use of the human ear the case of a simple tele- gram sent in Morse code whether or not the human ear is actually used in the moni Where the communication is trace -scribed onto_a paper tape Where the communication is furth- er transcribed onto a magnetic tape Hhhre the communication is cabled to N8A_for analysis Where the communication is printed out at the interception site at EBA or elsewhere Where a transcript or summary of the communication is forwarded to con sumer agencies I 2 Where the communication is not sus- ceptible to comprehension through the use of the human ear Address the same issues for each of the same questions as listed above v 1 VERY SENSITIVE jPaee-Thirtv Three 'Relevant Documents Mn Doc ID 6571846I issues WitneSSes 4 Ar any of the non-voice communicew tions monitored wire communica- tions within the meaning of 5 2510 1 of the Act For each of'the above cases in which an interception has taken p1ace _is the interception willful in each of the sets of circumstances Set out_under ebove 1 - p' Federal Communications Act of 934 What effect in the following cases 2 3 Voicefcommunications 1 Ship t043hip radio broadcasts in U S waters shore telephone a11$ Radio telephone cells 4 Telephone oalls traveling at some point by radio a b Non-voice communications 1 Ship to Ship code transnisSions in U S waters 11 4 - 3 an 3 SENSITIVE - Page Thirty Four Relevant Documents 47 U S Doc ID 6571846 I A 4 1 5 F rst U 51 'Iu '52 L15 issues Witnesses I Short wave private radio broad Banner casts i -- - VERY SENSITIVE 3 Telegrams relaxes etc D Do constitutibnal nrohibitions' Fourth Amend tment on wiretanping restrict NSA monitoring 1 Is warrantiess monitoring for national security purposes constitutional a Effect of Keith case need_warrant for domestic group seeking to influence or by unlawful me3ns - Justification for warrantiess surveillance of Black Panthers Women's Strike for Peace Clergy and Layman Concerned Vietnam Veterans- egainst the ear Effect of Zweibon case need warrant for domestic group affecting U S foreign relations and seeking to_change nblicies of a foreign power 1 Justification for warrantiess surveillance of JDL Meir Kahane and Zweibon himself - 2 If'a warrant is required in national security eases does this apply to 'Kelly Renorandum to Page Thirty Five Relevant Documents Banner House Testimony Petersen 91 73 Memorandnn to Kelly Petersen I Richardson Letterlto Allen and similar letters to other agencies u F I tu' Doc ID 6571846l - 0 - - 1 53 l' ESEVERY SENSITIVE Cgs 2 2 Page Thirty-Six Essues - Witnesses Relevant Documents - a Voice communications - Banner House Testimony 1 Where ULS 'name is kerord where i - that oerson is a Dart to the communita tion and the communication is inter 5 - eented Given to NBA Distri- buted to outside agencies - r 2 Where name is keyword _where I 7 that person is not a party to the com the intercepted communication has at least-one terminal - in the nited States Givan to NSA Distributed to outside agencies -Where no U S name is keyword1 where a U S citizen is party to the communication and the_communication is interceoted because another keyword is mentioned Given to NSA Distributed to outside agencies 4 Where no U S namelis keyword where that person is not a party to the communica tion where theqoonmunioation has at least one terminal in the U SL and the communica tion is interceoted because another keyword is mentioned Given to NSA Dis tributed to outside agencies b Non voice communications does the Constitution protect telegrams telexes etc 1 Where name is keyword where that person is a party to the communication and the communication is'interoepted Printed 3495 u- ag A - I l t 1 13 gssues 3L iEr 2351 my VERY SENSITIVE - EwoJ gif Rana r i 5 w 1 cyr 20% 51 l a 4 Jul - 'Witnesses 2 Hhere'U-S name is kevword 'where that person is not a party to the co - munication and where the intercepted communication has at least one terminal in the United States ' rinted out Given to NBA Distributed to outside agencies - a - 3 Where no U S name is keyword Where a U S citizen is party to the communiea tion and the communication is intercepted because another keyword is mentioned Printed out Given to NBA Dis- tributed to outside agencies 4 Where no U S name is keyword where that_person is Egg a party to the communica tion where the communication has at least one terminal in the'U S and the communica tion is intercepted because another keyword is mentioned Printed out Given to ESA Distributed to outside agencies E Factual Questions 1 Have you ever prepared any memoranda on the lawfulness of A a 'monitoring links with One terminal in the bu the watch list activity Page Thirty Seven E n 53e s fs Relevant'Doeuments Bartimo Memorandum wl Doc ID 6571846 11 _1ewfu1ness of the watch list ac 'vit' with U S names on the-list 15 KabulVERY SENSITIVE - 1 I - I Page ThirtyeEieht Witnesses Relevant Datuments 2 If not why ndti 3 If so identify the memorande What con clusions were reached 4 What is your present evaluation of the 'Eo 3 3b 1 Future Chatter Allen - Buffhem Should NSA have a sueeific legislative- Banner NSCID 6 charter If so - DCID 6f3 a Should it more carefully define foreign communications If so how b Foreign intelligence If so how c ationel security If so how d _cher 2 Should there be any other legislative changes in Omnibus Crime Coetrol and Safe Streets Act If so how 3 Should there be changes in the NSCID and relevant If so how rp - a ip-r- u                     National Security Archive    Suite 701  Gelman Library  The George Washington University    2130 H Street  NW  Washington  D C  20037    Phone  202 994‐7000  Fax  202 994‐7005  nsarchiv@gwu edu