ANNUAL HISTORICAL REVIEW US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FISCAL YEAR 1978 oc 001 Hi story Office Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff Operations Headquarters us Anny Intelligence and Security Command Arlington Hall Station Arlington Virginia 22212 RCS CSHIS-6 R3 - NOT RELEASABLE TO FO REIGN NATIONALS - --WARNING NOTICE-o SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED ' t - ' - ' ' o ' ' WARNING THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION 'AFFECTING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE LAWS US CODE TITLE 18 SECTIONS 793 794 AND 798 THE LAW PROHIBITS ITS TRANSMISSION OR THE REVELATION OF ITS CONTENTS IN ANY MANNER PREJUDICIAL TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE UNITED STATES THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMINT CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES IT IS TO BE SEEN ONLY BY U S PERSONNEL ESPECIALLY INDOCTRINATED AND AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE COMINT INFORMATION ON A STRICTLY NEED-TO-KNOW BASIS REPRODUCTION AND OR FURTHER DISSEMINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT OUTSIDE THE US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR HQ INSCOM APPROVAL i I' 0 002 ------------------------------- ----------- - - ' - ' o _i f - ' '' ' PREFACE The purpose of the Annual Historical Review is to present a surrmary of significant activities events and accomplishments of the US Anny Intelligence and Security Corrrnand INSCOM One of the major themes of the US Army Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study IOSS was the need for consolidation of the Army's intelligence disciplines The establishment of INSCOM on l January 1977 represented only the beginning of the effort to construct an organization and concept to implement a multidiscipline approach to collection production and security support A portion of the FY 1978 Annual Historical Review is devoted to providing an overview of the early stages of multidiscipline intelligence operations and activities within INSCOM This summary was prepared in compliance with AR 870-5 Military History Responsibilities Policies and Procedures The Annual Historical Review is primarily a reference document and coupled with the annual historical reports of subordinate units it represents a large part of the command's institutional memory As in the past the basic documentation for the Review has included the annual historical reports of headquarters staff elements subordinate units INSCOM Quarterly Program Reviews interviews conducted with HQ INSCOM personnel and correspondence documents within the headquarters files The surrrnary was limited by security compartmentation of some data This volume was prepared by Mr James L Gilbert with review and editing accomplished by Miss Virginia A Ferrell e September 1979 V or 003 1 o I oo oo o t ' o o j - ' o I CONFIDENTIAL CONTENTS Chapter I DEVELOPMENT OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINE CONCEPT II III oo Pagi MISSION FUNCTIONS AND LOCATION Mission and Functions o Location o 12 COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS Command and Staff Relationships o Concept for Intelligence and EW Operations at Echelons 15 15 12 13 Above Corps o o FM 100-16 Operations Echelons Above the Corps Designation of ACSI DA as the Focal Point for SIGINT IV v _ 15 16 19 ORGANIZATION INSCOM Organization o o New HQ INSCOM TOA o INSCOM Stationing Alternatives o Organization of the US Anny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center TAC o o Reorganization of INSCOM Liaison Offices o Relocation of Arlington Hall Station Tenants Organizati-on Day INSCOM Personnel Clearance Facility Transferred to MI LPERCEN o o o 22 RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Organization and Maintenance OMA Funds Military Construction Anny MCA o Family Housing Units Manpower Program Command Personnel Strength Military Strength by Program Command Personnel Situation INSCOM Key Personnel Communications Programs and Resources Project STREAMLINER o o Project LEt-ONADE o Resource Management Office Automatic Data Processing Activities Management by Objectives Program o Organizational Effectiveness o o INSCOM Officer Fellowship Program General and Field Grade Officer Promotions Enlisted Strength Sunmary o o o No-Sh M Problem Among Reassigned Personnel o 38 38 42 42 42 43 43 43 44 44 22 29 30 33 35 36 36 36 45 46 46 47 48 48 49 49 50 50 vii CONFIDENTIAL r c 004 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 1 - ' t L -0 I BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR o oc o _ r CONFIDENTIAL Chapter V RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Continued Reenlistment Rates o o Recruitment Posture by MOS Critical MOS Shortages o o Enlistment and Reenlistment Incentives Additional Skill Identifiers Contract Training Language Training o o Czech Linguist Shortage b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA The 142d Military Intelligence Linguist Company Utah National Guard o o o o Transfer of US Anny Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies o INSCOM Support to Joint Readiness Exercises REFORGER 78 o o o o Reserve Component MI Program Recommendations Equipment for ASA Reserve Units o Status of Individual Ready Reserve o o o Transfer of Statutory Tour Position o Transfer of Investigative Functions to DIS Arri val of Uncleared Personnel o o o Military Justice o o o Polygraph Examinations o Congressional Inquiries Requests for Assistance o o Status of Aircraft Resources o MOU on the Control and Employment of Anny Program II SIGINT Units o Cover and Deception US Anny Investigative Records Repository IRR SCI Facility at Fort Meade o o Base Operations Support USA Field Station Okinawa Rehling Nuclear Power Plant I onstructi on o Declassification of Cryptologic Records INSCOM Historical Collection o o Badge Changeover o Conversion to the Competitive Service o Follow-up Survey of INSCOM CIVPER Management by DCSPER DA o o Civilian High Grade Control Adoption of Flexitime o Labor Relations o o o INSCOM Intern Program o o Executive Order 12036 o o o o o Freedom of lnfonnat ion Privacy Office FOi PO oo Equal Employment Opportunity Office o o INSCOM Human Relations Equal Opportunity Program Page 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 57 57 58 58 59 59 60 60 60 60 61 61 62 64 65 66 66 67 68 70 70 74 74 75 76 76 76 77 77 78 78 79 79 79 81 82 ix CONFIDfNTIAl H'tfflffl'' -' Nm 3 %9 - 1 4 i l ti of til Y 't '1 t' w sr tt1tsa ua s PJ l I za tt L Wd1t2GBPGBP a 1GBP1 R CONFIDENTIAL Chapter V RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Continued Upward Mobility Program INSCOM Federal Women's Program o Suggestions Program o o o Military-Civilian Team Day o Command Infonnation Activities o Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement Travis Trophy Award o Page VI OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES o o o US Signal Intelligence Directive USSID 1000 Development of Intelligence and EW Systems o CRITIC Program o o o o o o Field Assistance Su ort Team FAST Conce t 90 90 90 91 83 83 83 83 84 85 85 92 93 93 Non-Codeword SIGINT Reporting Program o INSCOM Operational Readiness Report o o o INSCOM Operations Report o o o C P Company Communication Facility Development Project EELPOT o o DirecffonfiRd1ng Nets Single Station locator- - Single Station Locator-Europe o HF Modernization Study MAROON SHIELD o b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86 -36 b 1 Per NSA 1 Per NSA - b 3 - PL 86-36 I Io TRUSTY HUNTER o o o o Project Kunia o o o o o GRAVEL STREAM o o o o o TRIVIAL TIGER o o o o o o o 94 94 95 95 96 97 98 99 99 99 100 100 103 104 104 TOKAY MARC o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o GUARDRAIL V and QUICKLOOK II o o o 105 105 TRACER ROUND o 108 SIGSEC Positions o o o 108 SIGSEC Support Activities o l 09 SIGSEC Publications o o 109 LEFOX PURPLE AN FSQ-88 V2 o o o 110 Field Station Manning o 110 Project MUDPACK o o o o o 111 Advanced GOODKIN Acquisition System AGAS --1 MAROON SAIL Modernization 1 112 Project at FS Homestead o 112 113 I I- o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Project SEEK 114 Deployment of Detachment E USA Operational Group o o 115 115 Iranian Liaison o o o o o Support to Panama Canal Treaty Negotiations ooo ooo 116 117 Post Panama Canal Treaty Planning 118 _ Mini-Camera of the 470th MI Group ooo o xi CONflDfNTIAL nr oos i o I 'C 11 lo o '' o ''o ' _' o l ' 1 _ '-t ' i 'ffl o ' 1' o o 1 ' o 1 - ' 'I _ t o ' 1 t - J 't o o I o 'al 1 o 0 o l' - o o o Chapter VI OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES Continued Products Produced by US Anny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center 118 121 Peacetime Utilization Program REDTRAIN b 1 Per NSA b 3 P L 86-36 b 3 50 USC 3024 i Crash of U-21 A Aircraft Near S nop 123 124 126 Appendix A USA INSCOM Organizational Structure As of 30 Sep 78 129 B TOE Uni ts As of 30 Sep 78 132 C Changes in Status of TOE Units 133 D TDA Units As of 30 Sep 78 134 E Changes in Status of TOA Units 136 F USA INSCOM Personnel Strength by Unit As of 30 Sep 78 14l G USA INSCOM Key Personnel 145 H USA INSCOM Seal 152 I INSCOM Commanders at the 1977 Corm anders Conference 154 J Travis Trophy Winners 155 GLOSSARY 156 INSCOM Staff Directory - 1 Aug 78 Tables No 1 Analysis of Stationing Altematives 2 Direct Funding by Subprogram As of 30 Sep 78 3 Direct Obligations by Element of Expense FY 1978 4 Military Strength by Program 5 OPA Funding - PE 381055A xiii 32 38 41 43 45 r ' I - CONFIDENTIAL No 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Page General and Field Grade Officer Promotions Enlisted Strength by Geographical Area Subordinate Unit Reenlistments FY 1978 Recruitment by MOS FY 1978 Recruitment by Language MOS 98G Enlistment Incentives Reenlistment Incentives Additional Skill Identifiers Revised Additional Skill Identifiers Serious Crime Of fens es FY 1978 Administrative Eliminations Disposition of Other Offenses FY 1978 Polygraph Activities FY 1978 Aircraft Resources 30 Sep 78 USARJ Resources Available for Transfer 1978 CIVPER Survey Findings FOIA and PA Requests During FY 1978 FOIA and PA Costs FY's 1975-1977 FOIA and PA Costs FY 1977 Manhours Required for FOIA and PA CY's 1975-1977 EEO Office Staffing SIGSEC Positions SIGSEC Support Activities Position Manning Products Published by TAC xv CONFIDENTIAL -------------- '- ' 008 -o 49 so 51 52 52 55 55 56 56 63 63 64 64 66 71 77 80 80 80 81 82 108 108 110 118 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON - l P Li L v tr BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR l CRET CHAPTER I DEVELOPMENT OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINE CONCEPT U Integration of intelligence infonnation into a complete picture of the enemy situation has been perfonned throughout military history The intelligence staff officer pieced together unevaluated data collected from various sources and attempted to provide the commander with accurate and pertinent intelligence however with modern technology constantly increasing the capability to collect raw data the intelligence staff officer faced a growing amount of infonnation from which to assess the enemy situation The capability to direct and manage data collection to best answer infonnation requirements was often neglected in favor of increased volume of data collection Additionally the intelligence staff officer's ability to manage collection resources over which he had management responsibility had become increasingly difficult due to the overload of the analytical effort U In the years since the Vietnam War Army intelligence increasingly recognized the growing importance of infonnation integration Reorganization of Army intelligence as recommended by the Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study IOSS and use of terms such as all-source and multidiscipline reflected the growing belief that integration was essential not only at the planning and production levels but also at the collection and processing levels to manage the increased data problem U With the integration of Army intelligence collection units in the mid70's a wide range of potential advantages accrued One of these advantages was the ability to integrate various intelligence collection disciplines to provide more accurate and pertinent intelligence to the commander This integration of two or more intelligence disciplines improved planning tasking co llection management gathering processing fusing and dissemination of infonnation intelligence information and or intelligence U The multidiscipline approach recognized the interrelationship of collection production and security support It also recognized that each collection discipline was part of the total intelligence collection scheme In order for the intelligence officer to make the most effective use of intelligence information it was necessary to fuse separate pieces of intelligence infonnation into a single analysis Planning the collection effort required extensive knowledge of the capabilities of each discipline as well as proper employment in a given situation The multidiscipline approach placed more responsibility on collection managers to integrate collection planning and reporting thereby providing a more complete picture to the conT lander and his intelligence staff -ts The JOSS dated l August 1975 identified areas of concern to the Army intelligence community The need for consolidation of the Anny's intelligence disciplines was a major theme in the study Chapter 7 Intelligence Production addressed the many diverse production agencies existing in the or 009 'SECRET REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON - 1A 1l1 L -t I BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR Anny Their conflicting competitive roles were discussed and particularly the duplicative nature of their corm1and control and support staffs This chapter recommended the consolidation of production agencies and a functional structuring of an Anny intelligence center which pennitted a sin9le point customer service for the Anny and the Department of Defense DOD Chapter 8 Management and Major Command Organizational Structure 11 descri bed the major operational agencies and commands charged with management of intelli9ence by discipline and discussed the role of the Department of the Anny DA staff in the management area It was recommended that a single agency be established within DA to act as operational director for the Anny's intelligence effort and at the same time provide for continued support to DOD and the national requirements It was also recommended that the intelligence production center addressed in Chapter 7 be subordinated to the proposed agency to enhance the Army's total intelligence collection and production efforts 1 U Many problems emerged in the early stages of developing the multidiscipline concept even as to definitions In some of the writings during this period the term multidiscipl ine was used to emphasize the interrelationship of collection production and security support By other writers the tenn was used to stress that each collection discipline was part of the total intelligence collection scheme In the final analysis there was a merger of these definitions Multidiscipline Intelligence was defined as the integration of two or more intelligence disciplines to improve planning gathering processing fusing and dissemination of information intelligence information and or intelligence 11 11 J el b 1 b 3 Per NSA 50 USC 3024 I P L 86-36 b 1 Per DIA -cf -' ' o o r o e The term multidiscipline will be used in lieu of 11 all-source 11 since INSCOM units do not have access to all-source data 1 2 All existing reporting criteria requirements will be adhered to in the continued issuance of SIGINT and Intelligence Infonnation Report IR type reports The MOIR will neither delay nor replace the issuance of a SIGINT or IR report 3 Multidiscipline reports will be based and issued only when there appears via comparative analysis to be an association of SIGINT and HUMINT data i e the data confinns supports and or refutes each other 4 No MOIR data will be produced or combined which has not already been reported via separate and appropriate channels 5 Multidiscipline reports will not be stated or issued as product type reports but will only reflect the opinion of the unit analyst issuing the report and will not be used for any other purpose 6 Multidiscipline reporting will be accomplished using existing resources and will not be used to justify additional personnel or equipment 7 The MDIR's would be issued by the Group and not I- -- - J b 1 Per NSA b 3 P L 86-36 b 3 50 USC 3024 i At the close of FY 8_ t I __________ _J Group had generated less than 10 MDIR's C As early as December 1977 BG James E Freeze Deputy Commander INSCOM had stressed the need to begin multidiscipline intelligence reporting at the 66th Military Intelligence Group Europe and the 501st Military Intelligence Group Korea But no action had been taken by 30 September 1978 Jt _J f1tenge that th IGroup's efforts would serve as a forerunner _ _ _ _ ____ - to implementing MOIR' s elsewhere 2 U FY 1978 witnessed the initial attempts at reorganizing the HQ INSCOM structure to accommodate the new concept of centralized staff management of multidiscipline operations The planners however were automatically limited by two important constraints First until a final stationing decision was made personnel of the various staff elements would be physically located at two separate sites Arlin9ton Hall Station and Fort Meade Secondly the US Army Intelligence Agency USAINTA redesignated HQ INSCOM Fort Meade on 1 October 1977 had to remain in existence until a new integrated HQ INSCOM TOA could be approved by DA U Through independent actions the integration of virtually all supporttype staff elements at Fort Meade and Arlington Hall Station was scheduled for l October 1977 The actual integration of the two primary collection management staffs DCSOPS AHS and OIROPS Ft Meade was delayed because there did not exist a comprehensive pre-integration statement on the 3 r r 011 relationship between the two staffs A primary cause for this inability to address the subject at the time was the need to re-examine integration methodology The INSCOM Concept Plan described a collection operations staff oriented along discipline lines i e HUMINT SIGINT and PHOTINT elements This methodology was predicated on the relatively heavy resource management responsibilities of the SIGINT collection managers as compared to the operational control exercised by the HUMINT managers These differing conditions reflected NSA's SIGINT operational control OPCON and INSCOM's non-relationship with echelon corps and below SIGINT units perceived in January February 1977 Th is non-rel ati onsh ip appeared to be changing to require a deeper involvement of the HQ INSCOM's SIGINT staff in the technical management of non-INSCOM SIGINT collectors It was uncertain whether or not this changing relationship would dictate a different organizational fonn than envisioned in the concept plan Additionally since the concept plan was written the operational management of all Anny CONUS Continental US imagery collection platfonns had accrued to INSCOM another substantive impact on the collection management staff U At the direction of the INSCOM Chief of Staff an ad hoc study group composed of representatives of each intelligence discipline and headed by the DCSOPS was created to detennine and develop a DCSOPS organization which would allow multidiscipline application of intelligence techniques and at the same time provide through an evolutionary process a multidisciplined approach to implementing the objectives of the approved INSCOM Concept Plan U From the proposed alternatives the DCG for Intelligence chose to retain operating divisions along the lines of single discipline but would establish a small management office to develop operational policy both single and multidiscipline i to provide colTl land interface with Anny and national policy makers and to conduct resource progral'Tllling As a result in the DCSOPS organization which emerged in January 1978 each of the major disciplines was represented by a major division HUMINT SIGINT EW and Imagery In addition the Intelligence Coordination Center ICC was established The Center's mission was to provide multidiscipline coordination of INSCOM intelligence collection activities The ICC was to maintain data on current operational and readiness status of all INSCOM units and contnunications with these units through OPSCOM circuits and secure voice communications The Center began operations on 15 January 1978 and manning was accomplished by temporary fill until August However six personnel assigned represented only a half of the proposed authorized strength 3 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 --WARNING NOTICE-SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED 4 W2 I 0Li M g VIA CO' I oAiti4l E t At at4ELS riOT i tlL SA ULE TO FOREIGN NATIONP LS -- -------------- 1 4 ' - ' ' ' 1-' 1 o ' ' ' j b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 U Chapter 7 of the JOSS noted the fragmentation of effort among the nine Anny intelligence production and analytical organizations The Chief of Staff US Anny CSA directed that five of these organizations be unified under INSCOM On 1 January 1977 the following units were assigned to INSCOM FORSCOM Intelligence Group later redesignated INSCOM Intelligence Group and four OACSI-DA field operating units US Army Imagery Interpretation Center US Anny Intelligence Threat Analysis Detachment US Army Intelligence Operations Support Detachment and US Army Intelligence Support Detachment For the next year a provisional US Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center served to integrate the personnel and missions of the five organizations On 1 January 1978 the US Army Intelligence Threat Analysis Detachment was redesignated as US Anny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center at which time the former provisional status of the Center no longer applied The four other units which comprised the provisional center were concurrently discontinued Within six months the Center's authorized strength stood at 91 officers 25 warrant officers 126 enlisted and 185 civilians The projected yearly budget was $72 million 10 percent of the INSCOM total U The mission of the US Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center TAC was to Process analyze produce report and disseminate multisource integrated intelligence and counterintelligence products threat analyses and imagery exploitation for DA and Major Commands MACOM s in support of combat operations training planning and materiel and combat development activities to identify intelligence gaps of interest to DA and to se ve as threat validation executive agent for the Department of the Army 5 1 U From the TAC organization emerged a new concept in INSCOM support of tactical units the Field Assistance Support Team FAST FAST was an attempt to bridge the gap between national level intelligence agencies and CONUS-based tactical units primarily those with worldwide quick reaction missions Flexibility was the key word in the concept Personnel of the team were to come from ITAC's Field Support Office which maintained a close working relationship with tactical units other organizations units within INSCOM with particular expertise and ultimately from national agencies with first hand knowledge and experience in the area in question Nonnally FAST upon being placed on alert would be airlifted to the supported unit and carry with it an intelligence package of all available pertinent information intelligence At the unit the Team would serve as a channel of intelligence between the G2 and the national level agencies The Intelligence Coordination Center at HQ INSCOM would nonnally provide FAST with the information 6 5 --WARNING NOTICE-- SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES AND METHODS INVOLVED - 013 HA E VIA COMINl CHANN NLY ji i i L 1 AiJLE T NATIONALS --- W-e-eo Worldwide many separate actions were taken to implement the multidiscipline concept Three of these are discussed in detail b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 6 COMINl H A NNELS b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 S side from specific examples of substantive multidiscipline interaction in specific reports analyst discussions and information sharing among disciplines were very fruitful As an example the 470th Group produced two significant Intelligence Information Reports IIR's in August 1977 which revealed that BG Torrijos was ready to accept the proposed Panama Canal Treaties as written b 1 I U As a result of its efforts the 470th MI Group received various recognitions including the following letter of commendation from the ACSI b 1 b 1 b 1 7 NOT RELEASABlE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS ---- HANOI IA COMINl CHANNELS Y 5 U L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - sECRET Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center ITAC dealt with those requiring production ITAC's first response was to send by message current order of battle OB data on the situation in Shaba Province Zaire HQ INSCOM spent a great amount of effort during the first 24-hour p riod coorclina_tiJ19 use among various intelligence agencies such asl INSA and insuring PERDIA that INSCOM FORSCOM and the XVIII Airborne Corps were in receipt of messages from the Joint Chiefs of Staff JCS State Department and Central Intelligence Agency CIA u S NOFORN After the XVIII Airborne Corps was officially placed on alert FORSCOM requested that a FAST team be dispatched The FAST consisting of the Chief Field Support Office an African area expert and a representative of ITAC's Imagery Intelligence Production Division departed Davison Army Air Field at 1855 hours on 16 May The team carried with them annotated enlargements of photography of five principal target areas which had been decompartmented Upon arrival at Fort Bragg the team briefed the XVIII Airborne Corps G-2 and staff members participated in initial Corps G-3 planning sessions checked availability of linguists updated status of tarqets in Zaire and briefed the 82d Airborne Division u S NOFORN On the morning of 17 May HQ INSCOM dispatched satellite imagery targets requested by Corps and collected during the night along with a packet of available message traffic By mid-morning of the 17th the situation had been somewhat defused with the successful evacuation of US Citizens The remainder of the support was mainly one of monitoring the current situation and providing updated infonnation u S NOFORN During the crisis INSCOM served primarily as a catalyst to provide national intelligence collection and infonnation in response to the XVIII Airborne Corps In the P rocess of producing analyzing and disseminating the intelligence INSCOM tailored the support to the Corps' needs The XVIII Airborne Corps expressed their thanks for the efforts of the FAST 9 u S NOFORN Several lessons learned surfaced as a result of the crisis There were 1imited resources at ITAC including definitive OB map coverage and area expertise Imagery support required updating and in some cases it was unavailable It also appeared that INSCOM was structuring itself with an awkward system of protocols when dealing with other agencies who had infonnation needed Communications required a constant monitoring to insure that those invo1ved1nplanning were receiving the technical data on a timely basis 10 U The multidiscipline concept went beyond collection and production of intelligence it also impacted upon management of resources as evidenced by the changes which occurred in the Peacetime Utilization Program PUP The program was initiated to improve the readiness training of personnel assigned to SIGINT support units In a briefing held for GEN Kerwin Vice Chief of Staff US Anny on 26 May 1978 HQ INSCOM outlined the beginning of the Multidiscipline Peacetime Utilization Program MDPUP Previously the program had not included Reserves or non-SIGINT intelligence disciplines On 8 NOi RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS _we or 01s #ii REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON O y ' r J-c 1 BY USAINSC0 1 FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 l R e v EI 8 August 1978 the Chief of Staff HQ INSCOM designated elements within the headquarters as focal points for the development of the program in their respective disciplines in regard to the primary functions of mission development technical support and live environment training 11 l f f i Despite the progress made during FY 1978 much remained to be accomplished if intelligence was to become the norm and not the exception Maximum support for the tactical conunander and maximum utilization of US Army intelligence resources would not be achieved until the mechanism procedures for interdiscipline interface were fonnulated and implemented INSCOM still had several important subjects to address One of these areas of concern was the utilization of data from one sensor to tip-off and drive others In b 1 Per NSA b 3 P L 86-36 b 3 50 USC 3024 i ascertain the approximate size and location of the exercise from GUARDRAIL to provide data concerning location as well as additional intercept and from QUICKLOOK to provide ELINT relative to noncommunications emitters associated with the exercise Exercises in peacetime and combat operations in wartime required that the Army's intelligence sources be able to collect maximum data in the shortest time possible in order that INSCOM could fuze available data from all sensors and report this data on real time basis This mechanism did not exist S JooJoFORN Although progress within INSCOM's miltidiscipline interface was being made the scope of this effort required expansion Mechanisms were needed to be established to pennit field units to exploit local and national level imagery on a real time basis For example during an enemy exercise if imagery of the suspect exercise area was available during the appropriate time frame the field unit should have established channels to imagery exploitation centers to request time sensitive exploitation to obtain corroborating data for that obtained from organic sensors This corroborating data could then be used in conjunction with sensor data for multidiscipline reporting while the exercise was in progress or in multidiscipline wrap-up reporting to provide commanders with the most comprehensive and timely intelligence picture possible wJIJ S CCO NOFORN Experience proved that close interface between SIGINT and HUMINT disciplines had the potential for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of both Basically SIGINT units should be provided with timely tip-off's relative to HUMINT collection potential provided by legal travelers with access to denied areas in order that their requirements could be included in pre-mission briefings and or post-mission debriefings Additionally selected personnel at SIGINT sites should be made aware of the collection capabilities of Resident Agents in the event data from these sources was required to support corroborate SIGINT operations Conversely data might appear in SIGINT for which no reporting guidance existed this could be useful in planning implementing monitoring clandestine collection NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS HANDLE V MINT S ONLY 4 c1 - - operations Appropriate SIGINT units should be informed on a continuing basis of the general and specific operational data requirements of HUMINT units in order that this data not normally available outside of SIGINT raw traffic could be extracted and forwarded to HUMINT units _ _S--eCO NoFORN As modem air travel shrinks the globe the potential for intertheater satisfaction of collection requirements increase For exam le b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 One central element should be ass1gne t e respons n HUMINT lead development for collection capability in order that this capability could be cross-checked on a continuing basis against collection requirements assigned to INSCOM units worldwide If a unit developed or had the potential to develop the capability to satisfy a requirement levied against another unit that did not have this potential then steps should be taken to transfer action on the requirement 12 - NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS 10 - rr 018 ----- ----- FOOTNOTES - CHAPTER I l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -------- --- ---- -------- --- - DEVELOPMENT OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINE CONCEPT Ann Rept of Maj Actvs USASA FY76 7T TSC 'NOFORN LIMCIS pp 178-179 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY 78 Vol I TS CCO NOFORN pp 179-181 Staff Note IAOPS-M 19 Apr 78 S-CCO NOFORN AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 2-6 12 CMT 3 DF IAOPS-OR 10 Jul 78 subj Results of DAIMYOS II Conference 17-21 Apr 78 U S CCO NOFORN WNINTEL 1978 USAINSCOM Conmanders Conference 23-27 Oct 78 Preconference Packet S pp 0-4 - D-7 Ibid p D-11 1977 Travis Trophy Nominee 470th MI Gp SC pp 13-16 AHR 470th MI Gp FY78 TSC NOFORN App T Extracts Draft Briefing on Zaire Crisis S NOFORN OF IAOPS-ICC 13 Jul 78 subj Zaire Crisis Follow-up U S-CCO NOFORN WNINTEL 11 12 Fact Sheet IAOPS-PTR 5 Sep 78 subj Peacetime Utilization U CMT 2 1 OF IAOPS-OR 27 Jul 78 subj Intelligence Support for Tactical Units S-CCO NOF'ORN 11 r c 019 CONFIDENTIAL CHAPTER II MISSION FUNCTIONS AND LOCATION illIJ Mission and Functions fEURt-On 2 May 1977 Headquarters Department of the Anny HQDA requested INSCOM to draft an Anny regulation defining the mission functions responsibilities and command relationships of INSCOM which would supersede AR 10-122 and AR 10-46 The draft AR 10-X underwent a number of redrafts reviews and coordinations before the final draft designated AR 10-53 Organization and Functions US Army Intelligence and Security Command was forwarded to DA Management Staff on 17 October 1977 for final staffing prior to publication The document was subsequently approved and became effective on 15 June 1978 The mission for the CG INSCOM as set forth in AR 10-53 was to1 Conduct intelligence counterintelligence Cl and electronic warfare EW operations in support of the Anny at Echelons Above Corps EAC 2 Conduct Signals Intelli ence SIGINT operations as a member of the United States SIGINT System lUSSS 3 Co11111and the Anny component of the Central Security Service CSS and serve as Chief of the Anny Service Cryptologic Agency SCA 4 Conduct Human lnte 11 igence HUMINT operations in general support of Army and other authorized United States intelligence community collection requirements 5 Conduct CI investigations and operations collection production and related CI support activities 6 Provide Anny-wide all-source multidisciplined Operational Security OPSE C support 7 Conduct Anny-wide signal security SIGSEC support operations 8 Analyze produce and disseminate all-source counterintelligence and general intelligence less medical and provide all-source threat analysis support to the Anny as authorized by pertinent statutory and regulatory authorities 9 Provide technical advice and operational assistance to other functional and operating Major Anny Commands MACOM's in the discharge of their intelligence EW and security responsibilities 10 Act as the HQDA Executive Agent for the management of the Military Intelligence Peacetime Utilization Program Active and Reserve 12 CONFIDENTIAL r r 020 ft1 ' 1' i iiLBfi flii@L HJ JPY J l 'S 'F 1 2 W m m I REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON - r' - Jf ' t L u-0 BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR EONFIDENTIAL 11 Provide advice assistance and technical operational support to insure maximum exploitation of national intelligence assets in improving ground processing and dissemination for tactical support from Special Activities Office SAO systems 12 Act as the Initial Denial Authority IDA and Access Amendment Refusal AAR authority for all requests involving US Anny intelligence investigative files 13 Act as the HQDA Executive Agent for target exploitation TAREX a cryptologic directed activity dealing with the collection and exploitation of cryptologic associated information equipment and documents 14 Conduct or participate in photographic intelligence PHOTINT operations in general support of Anny and other authorized Unites States intelligence community collection requirements 1 Location U Headquarters US Army Intelligence and Security Command was located at Arlington Hall Station 4000 Arlington Boulevard Arlington Virginia 22212 Until a final stationing decision is effected certain staff functions will continue to be located at Fort George G Meade Maryland 20755 - 13 CONFIDENTIAL rr 021 aun z i RU##lh IDMWL Et St REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 'i hJ l L c -c1 BY USAINSCOM FOIJPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR t FOOTNOTES - CHAPTER I I MISSION FUNCTIONS AND LOCATION 1 AR 10-53 Organization and Functions INSCOM 15 Jun 78 C pp 1-2 - 14 or 022 CHAPTER I I I COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS U fG- Command and Staff Reiationships AR 10-53 Organization and Functions US Army Intelligence and Security Command effective 15 June 1978 established the basic command and staff relationships for INSCOM The regulation outlined the following relationships l The CG INSCOM is under the supervision of the Chief of Staff US Army Directives authorities policy planning and prograrraning guidance approval programs and resource allocations and other methods of command direction are issued to CG INSCOM by the Chief of Staff US Army 2 The CG INSCOMa Commands the Army component of the Central Security Service CSS and is subordinate to the Chief CSS for the conduct of SIGINT operations b Manages SIGINT resources to accomplish SIGINT operational tasks assigned by DIRNSA CHCSS c Provides specified military personnel and administrative logistic and operational support to the DIRNSA CHCSS as authorized by HQDA d b 1 Per DIA - 3 INSCOM and other MACOM's are coordinate elements of DA The CG INSCOM is authorized to communicate directly with other major Anny commanders or with heads of Anny Staff agencies on matters of mutual interest 4 The CG INSCOM will maintain liaison as necessary with MACOM s field operating agencies other cryptologic and intelligence activities and other governmental agencies to maintain an awareness of to exchange information on and to insure coordination of matters of mutual concern l 1 U Conce t for Intelligence and EW Operations at Echelons Above Corps f-5-1-NOFORF HQDA tasked HQ INS COM to assist the US Anny Training and Ooctri ne Command TRADOC in the formulation of an Anny Intercept and Position Fixing IPF position INSCOM's Concept for Intelligence and EW for Echelons Above Corps was forwarded to TRADOC in August 1977 It was a loosely structured concept which acknowledged both a variety of separate realities 15 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS __ r r 023 MSW and the requirement for a definition of echelons above corps EAC The INSCOM EAC concept indicated there was no known coherent doctrine for the implementation of tactical intelligence and electronic warfare operations and support at echelons above corps or for joint operations involving Anny forces It addressed those operations at echelons above corps and at joint task force level proposing a concept to meet the purposes of INSCOM DA and Joint Co1T1T1anders as they were confronted with the resolution of first multi-service and then multi-national operations 6FO INSCOM proposed its concept to TRAOOC during the latter part of August 1977 but it was not favorably received It was generally believed that INSCOM did not address the Army Intercept and Position Fixing sufficiently Accordingly HQ INSCOM revised the concept and submitted its PF concept to TRADOC in late September 1977 2 FM 100-16 O erations Echelons Above The Corps U A HQ INSCOM working group chaire by OPPA HQ INSCOM wrote the initial draft of Chapter 5 Intelligence Security and Electronic Warfare to FM 100-X fonnally designated FM 100-16 Operations Echelons Abov e The Corps The document was fol' ' arded to HQDA on 10 November 1977 This chapter established basic intelligence and security doctrine for the US Anny at echelons above the corps and was based upon the INSCOM Concept Plan While the document was still in draft stage the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence ACS MG Edmund R Thompson changed the wording of the Theater Army Intelligence Command's support role from one of being under the operational control of the theater commander to being direct support The change would indicate a less than permanent support relationship between the Theater Army Intelligence Command and the Theater Army Commander At the close of FY 1978 the draft of FM 100-16 was still being coordinated at DA level U The following extracts from the FM 100-16 draft give definitions of INSCOM's role in EAC operations along with those of the Theater Army Intelligence Command TAIC the Intelligence Security Support Group ISSG and the Field Operating Units U The US Army Intelligence and Security Command INSCOM provides commanders at EAC with intelligence security and EW support It provides a framework for US Army interfaces with the national intelligence community in both peace and war and a means for directly linking the intelligence systems at EAC with the commanders at corps and below INSCOM provides support to component joint unified and combined commands through a tailored intelligence support structure which may include the establishment of a subordinate Theater Army Intelligence Command TAIC in each theater In theaters and in contingency operations the magnitude of which does not require more than an Intelligence Security Support Group ISSG a TAIC may not be created In this instance the supporting ISSG 16 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS __ _ -SECRET r r ltl i-' - Fi REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON JPY' GBP- l ' J 0 Ir BY USAINSCOM FOI PA S Auth Para4-102 DOD 5200 lR 024 H A e e r o o ' ' 1 _ ' o o ' ' would carry out the required functions associated with a-TAIC During wartime INSCOM provides commanders at EAC area oriented national intelligence and CI OPSEC Support Additionally and acting in concert with Theater Army Commanders INSCOM provides augmentation of in-theater EAC intelligence resources as required U The limited in-theater intelligence security and EW resources at EAC require centralized management In addition the TAIC provides the capability to tailor support packages for contingency operations without forcing either a cessation or unacceptable drawdown of other critical intelligence operations worldwide The TAIC provides EAC commanders in a theater of operations with a total range of intelligence security and EW support services coordination channels with national level intelligence agencies and a means for managing all Theater Army intelligence resources It also provides for integration of army resources conmitted to peacetime national efforts into wartime operations with the least disruption A TAIC provides administrative limited intelligence peculiar logistical and technical support to subordinate elements during wartime regardless of the operational command to which they are comitted A TAIC provides the means with which to address problems of compartmentation and sanitization of information and intelligence at all levels of operation A TAIC interfaces with the SIGINT technical channel between the Corps CEWI Group and the US national SIGINT system U HQ INSCOM under the direction of the Department of the Army and in coordination with the Theater Army commander tailors a TAIC to support the specific intelligence security and electronic warfare requirements of each supported commander U The TAIC consists of a conmander and staff a sufficient number of Intelligence and Security Support Groups ISSG's to support selected EAC headquarters in-theater and a number of Staff Support Cells SSC and field operating units The TAIC will also have sufficient organic secure conmunications to communicate with its own elements its ISSG's and field operating units TAIC's in other theaters supported co1T1Tiands 1 and with joint combined national and other intelligence systems as required U The major deployable elements in the TAIC are ISSG's which deploy and operate to support EAC commanders An ISSG consists of a corranander and an operational staff which provides a base for attached elements Like maneuver brigades these ISSG's are flexible organizations which can be configured and deployed to meet specific mission requirements An ISSG will include a staff support cell as a minimum and may also include a variable number of field operating units collection EW Cl OPSEC PHOTINT support The ISSG is augmented with 17 or o- W _Jlii'f oz t 1 4 P U WWWiiiU 0 P -UTILW Z L Jl UMSJA 2 h 025 attached elements based on the requirements stated in operations and contingency plans of the supported corrmander Staff support cells operate under the operational control of the ISSG commander and are tailored to the requirements of the supported commander U The field operating units of a TAIC are those units which normally operate outside of a supported command headquarters They include intelligence collection units EW units CI OPSEC Support units PHOTINT support units and comnunications units assigned to the TAIC The exact number and type of such units assigned is based on overall theater requirements Field operating units may remain under the command and control of the TAIC or be attached to an ISSG Field operating units consist of U Collection and EW units ranging in size from detachments to battalions They will be assigned to the TAIC based on the peace and war mission requirements of the supported cotrrnand and collection assets already present in corps and divisions U CI OPSEC Support units which provide services throughout the Comnunications Zone COMMZ and into the combat zone when required U PHOTINT Support units In general all Anny imageproducing collectors will be organic to corps and lower echelons U During peacetime the TAIC will be under the command of INSCOM and the operational control of the Theater Army commander Control of TAIC operations will be exercised by this commander to the maximum extent consistent with national and departmental directives and theater requirements In wartime command of the TAIC will be transferred to the Theater Anny commander who exercises operational control in peacetime U In both peace and war operational control of deployed ISSG's rest with the supported commander but command remains with the TAIC Administrative and limited intelligence peculiar logistical support to ISSG's and field operating units is provided by the TAIC in peacetime Logistic support in wartime except for the acquisition of sensitive and unique intelligence items is the responsibility of the supported comnand - U TAIC field operating units may either remain under the direct canmand and control of the TAIC or be attached to an ISSG Their support responsibilities are determined by their level of assignment 18 026 e and the operational missions assigned to them by the supported commander much in the manner as for an artillery unit 3 Designation of ACSI DA as the Army Focal Point for SIGINT U A DA letter dated 20 March 1978 announced the designation of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence HQDA as the Anny Focal Point for SIGINT As focal point for SIGINT the ACSI was responsible to the Secretary of the Anny and to the Chief of Staff US Army for effective Anny participation in the United States SIGINT System USSS and for insuring that the Army had an integrated and cohesive SIGINT program The letter described the HQDA Major Anny Corrrnand interaction necessary to accomplish this function 4 ACSI's specific SIGINT functions were to1 U Fonnulate DA SIGINT policy and promulgate policy guidance to the DA Staff and MAC0M's 2 U Develop and coordinate Army positions on SIGINT matters to include tasking other staff agencies and MAC0M's for inputs as required 3 U Provide SIGINT interface between Department of the Anny and 0SD 0JCS and other governmental agencies excluding intelligence related activity IRA program matters for which DCS0PS is proponent 4 U Assist Army representatives in preparation and presentation of testimony or infonnation to the Congress 5 U Insure a coordinated SIGINT position for US Army participation in multiservice and multinational forums 6 U Review and participate in US Anny management of SIGINT and related activities to insure optimum compatibility and interface with the USSS 7 U Serve as SIGINT Architecture point of contact to NSA and insure appropriate DA Staff and MAC0M participation in national level SIGINT architecture planning DCS0PS has DA Staff proponency for overall Army systems to include SIGINT tactical systems within the IRA programs OACSI insures that these programs are appropriately reflected within the National SIGINT Plan 8 U Guide Anny interaction with NSACSS 9 U Provide representation to Director Central Intelligence National Foreign Intelligence Board intelligence committees U ACSI's specific relationships were stated as follows 1 U Nothing in this charter changes the functional responsibilities of DA Staff agencies and MAC0M's 19 nr 027 - 2 U Each staff agency and MACOM will interact with NSACSS within their functional areas keeping OACSI fully infonned 3 U SIGINT or SIGINT-related projects plans programs and or problems normally will be acted upon by the staff agency having functional primacy fully coordinating with OACSI 4 U OACSI will be the primary agency for developing the HQDA position on SIGINT policy matters 5 U The ACSI is the authoritative SIGINT policy voice for the Anny 6 U USAINSCOM will continue to perform as the Army Service Cryptologic Agency SCA in accordance with US Signal Intelligence Directive 1000 20 Ol' 028 W fCMiC ZU- GBP GBP #1 J 1 o o f ' '' o ' o ' o FOOTNOTES - CHAPTER III l 2 3 4 ' ' 1 ' oo COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS AR 10-53 Organization and Functions INSCOM 15 Jun 78 C pp 5-6 Ann Hist Rev INSCOM FY77 TSC tlOFORN LIMDIS pp 18-21 AHR OPPA HQ INSCOM FY78 C Chap 2 p l and App B AHR DCSS HQ INSCOM FV78 S-CCO p 18 Point Paper IACS-P subj 20 Jan 78 G O Conference on Army SIGINT Activities 16 Jan 78 U i HQDA Ltr 381-78-l DAMI-ISS M 7 Mar 78 20 Mar 78 subj Department of Army Signals Intelligence SIGINT Focal Point U 21 ' 029 -o TM - ' -------------------------------BS' CHAPTER IV ORGANIZATION INSCOM Organization U At the close of FY 1978 there was a total of 57 units 16 TOE and 41 TDA in the INSCOM organizational structure This TOA figure does not include Augmentation Augmentation Carrier or Provisional units Worldwide organization and deployment as of 30 September 1978 is indicated in appendix A For lists of TOE and TOA units at the close of the report period see appendixes Band O respectively Changes in the status of TOE and TOA units occurring during the fiscal year are depicted in appendixes C and E respectively U MG William I Rolya conmanded the US Army Intelligence and Security Command throughout the year BG James E Freeze served in the dual role of Deputy Commander INSCOM FGGM and Commander HQ INSCOM Ft Meade until 15 May 1978 when his title was changed to Deputy Commander for Intelligence with continued station at Fort George G Meade On that same date BG John A Smith Jr was assigned to INSCOM and assumed the position of Deputy Commander for Security with station at Arlington Hall Station In keeping titles matched with functions for which each deputy was charged the title of BG Smith's was changed on 23 August to Deputy Commander for Security and Production U Continued transition and consolidation characterized FY 1978 Until a final decision could be made on the stationing study functions of HQ INSCOM out of necessity had to continue operating in a split mode with the command element and major staff being located at Arlington Hall Station and other staff and subordinate commands being located at Fort George G Meade One of the primary goals during the year was uniting the functions and personnel of both locations under one headquarters organization even though physically separate On 1 October 1977 the US Army Intelligence Agency was redesignated Headquarters INSCOM Fort Meade This change was mostly symbolic however as the unit had to remain in existence until a new HQ INSCOM TDA could be prepared and approved by DA The new TOA would consolidate all of the manpower spaces under one organization In the meantime the staff functions were being integrated For example all personnel functions were under one OCSPER even though the staff remained split between the two locations Internal reorganizations continued over the next three months as functions and manpower were redefined U To facilitate the integration process a series of temporary counterpart organizational structures were made at command group level for duty at Fort Meade The position of Chief of Staff FGGM was established on 1 October 1977 and was filled by COL Albert W Hamel until 16 January 1978 when the office was abolished COL Hamel was then assigned to the position of Assistant Chief of Staff FGGM until 31 July when that office was also abolished Likewise the position of Secretary of the General Staff SGS 22 030 was established and filled by MAJ R S Green from 16 January to l April 1978 and by lLT R G Hiler from 1 April until 11 August 1978 at which time the office was tenninated U At the end of FY 1978 Headquarters US Anny Intelligence and Security Command was organized to consist of a Command Group General Staff and Personal Staff as shown below Co1T1Tiand Group CG --- ----- __-__ _ U The CG US Anny Intelligence and Security Command was respons e to the Chief of Staff US Anny for accomplishment of the missions and functions prescribed by AR 10-53 and was concurrently responsible to the Chief Central Security Service for all SIGINT activities for which National Security Agency Central Security Service NSACSS was responsible De ut Commandin General for Intelli ence DCG-1 U The Deputy Commanding Genera or Inte 1gence ass ste t e CG 1n the management of all intelligence operations of USAINSCOM to include electronic warfare in its offensive role electronic warfare support measures and electronic countermeasures De ut Commandin General for Securit and Production DCG-SP U The Deputy Cornman ng Genera or Secur ty an ro uct on assisted the CG in the management of all threat analysis production and intelligence countermeasures operations of USAINSCOM to include electronic warfare in its defensive role electronic countermeasures Command Sergeant Major CSM U The CSM served as a persona 1 advisor and principal enlisted assistant to the CG on those matters pertaining primarily to enlisted personnel including but not limited to morale welfare customs and courtesies of the service enlistment and reenlistment discipline and promotion policies Chief of Staff CofS U The CofS was responsible to the CG and DCG's for formulating and announcing policies pertaining to the operation of the staff and reviewing staff actions to insure compliance with announced policies and plans The Office of Plans Programs and Analysis and the Office of Public Affairs were directly subordinate to the CofS Assistant Chief of Staff ACofS U The ACofS acted for the CofS during 1s a sence an per orme ot er duties as assigned by the CofS Supervised the activities of the Secretary of the General Staff and the Public Affairs Office Secretar of the General Staff SGS U The SGS acted as executive officer ice manager or the offices of the CG DCG's and CofS supervising the activities of the Public Affairs Office 23 031 r ' - ' rn n I Chief Plans Pro rams and Anal sis CPPA U The Chief PPAwas the pr nc pa ass stant tote o or command level management analysis and principal in charge of the MACOM Planning Group an ad hoc group established to conceptually organize the Intelligence and Security Command as directed by the IOSS Department of the Anny Because of the small number of people assigned the Office of Plans Programs and Analysis had no internal organizational divisions or branches Chief Office of Public Affairs COPA U The Chief OPA advised the CG of general staff responsibilities in the public affairs program through the collection maintenance and dissemination of information concerning INSCOM activities It directed and supervised the audiovisual support activities of the command and provided staff supervision to subordinate commands concerning audiovisual requirements OPA consisted of the INSCOM Audiovisual Manager Plans and Services Branch Graphic Aids Branch and Audiovisual Branch On 1 September 1977 the Post Photographic Laboratory was placed under the operational control of the Audiovisual Manager even though the spaces remained on the USAG Arlington Hall Station TOA The change was brought about by AR 108-2 which directed that all audiovisual activities be placed under one manager General Staff Deputy Chief of Staff Personnel DCSPER U The DCSPER exercised staff supervision over personnel and administration for the CG to include militar1 and civilian personnel management personnel planning human relations HR equal employment opportunity EEO safety personnel services morale and welfare organizational effectiveness OE discipline nonappropriated fund activities retention personnel information systems and administrative management In November 1977 CG INSCOM directed that an Equal Employment Opportunity Office be established under the DCSPER He further directed that the military counterpart Human Relations Equal Opportunity Program be placed within the same office U The establishment of INSCOM brought about an expanded civilian personnel mission e g increased civilian strength a roore diverse work force and considerable geographical dispersion These added responsibilities plus the need to remain consistent with the standard MACOM staffing pattern led to the detailing of Mr Gott to the Staff Civilian Personnel Officer position on 15 February 1978 however DA approval for the newly established Staff Personnel Officer had not been received at the end of the year Individual training functions being performed at Fort Meade were transferred to DCSPER on 24 April 1978 At the close of the year the ODCSPER consisted of the following subordinate elements Management Ui vision Military Personnel Division Civilian Personnel Division Staff Civilian Personnel Office Administration Services Division Equal Employment Opportunity Office and Plans and Training Division Deputy Chief of Staff Operations DCSOPS 24 1 I C The DCSOPS formulated and REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON rL-fitt c 2--C 1 BY USAINSCO f FOl PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR 032 implemented INSCOM policy on multidiscipline collection and electronic warfare EW activities coordinated and supervised conduct of INSCOM operations involving HUMINL SIGINT IMINT and EW resources and provided operational advice and assistance on intelligence collection exploitation and EW matters to Major Anny Commands and activities During FY 1978 there were several major functional changes within ODCSOPS Perhaps the most significant was the organizational integration of the HUMINT functions at Fort Meade with the rest of the functions of the ODCSOPS at Arlington Hall Sta ti on Centralized staff management of multi-source HUMINT SIGINT PHOTINT multidiscipline collection counterintelligence and production operations was an objective in the establishment of HQ INSCOM and was advocated in the Vice Chief of Staff US Army's approval of the INSCOM Concept Plan on 2 May 1977 The HUMINT functions were assumed by DCSOPS on 3 January 1978 The second major change in the area of functions was the removal of the requirements and systems functions from the DCSOPS to a newly created staff element the Deputy Chief of Staff Systems on 3 January U As part of its 3 January 1978 reorganization ODCSOPS was restructured into the following major divisions Plans Training Reserve Affairs PTR Directorate Operations and Readiness Directorate SIGINT EW Directorate PHOTINT Directorate HUMINT Directorate the only OCSOPS subordinate element located at Fort Meade Management Office History Office and the Administrative Office Basically the DCSOPS maintained its same structure for the remainder of the reporting period however there were exceptions In June 1978 the PHOTINT Directorate was redesignated as Imagery Directorate to more accurately reflect those specific PHOTINT functions the Directorate was concerned with In August 1978 the title of Directorate was dropped from Operati ans and Readiness SIGINT EU HUMINT Imagery and PTR With the exception of SIGINT EW and HUMINT the title change more accurately reflected the size of the element At the same time the positions of Director SIGINT EW Directorate and Director HUMINT Directorate were changed to Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations SIGINT EW and Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations HUMINT respectively Finally the Intelligence Coordination Center under Operations and Readiness was established on 12 January 1978 as a result of the ad hoc study group's recommendations The Center's mission was to provide multidiscipline coordination of INSCOM intelligence collection activities The ICC would maintain data on current operational and readiness status of all INSCOH units and communications with these units through OPSCOr t1 circuits and secure voice communications Although the Center was operational on 15 January manning was by temporary fill only until August De ut Chief of Staff Lo istics DCSLOG U The OCSLOG had general staff respons1b ty or t e management o a 1 INSCOM logistic activities In this capacity the OCSLOG served as the Director for Military Construction Army MCA Program and was responsible for developing and monitoring the logistic portion of the Operation and Maintenance Army OMA Program On 1 October 1977 the ODCSLOG underwent a major reorganization The Procurement Division was disestablished because of the command's loss of its 25 F YI r f' f -- ' o o - T- I o ri 'r r oo r __ o t n ' 1 033 o REGRADED UNCLASSIF ED oN i z I L 2 - 1k BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-10 DOD 5200 lR worldwide procurement responsibilities to US Army Materiel Development and Readiness Conunand DARCOM on 1 December 1976 From 1 December 1976 to l October 1977 the Procurement Division continued to exercise limited contractual activities Secondly the Materiel Division was redesignated Supply and Services Division Finally with the integration of the HQ INSCOM staff at Fort Meade and Arlington Hall Station there was the establishment of Assistant DCSLOG at Arlington Hall Station and the Assistant DCSLOG at Fort Meade The ADCSLOG AHS supervised the Supply and Services Division AHS Maintenance Division AHS Installation Division AHS Fixed Station Engineering Division Management Office and Administrative Office The ADCSLOG FGGM supervised the Supply and Services Division FGGM Deputy Chief of Staff S stems DCSS U The DCSS was the principal staff assistant in coordinating matters within INSCOM pertaining to planning development and acquisition of INSCOM's requirements conceptual planning interoperability and systems management in support of field stations and intelli$ence electronic warfare counterintelligence CI operations security OPSEC HUMINT and imagery units at theater echelons above corps The INSCOM Concept Plan ori9inally assigned requirements and systems functions combat development CD and research development and acquisition RDA interfaces to the DCSOPS This would have placed responsibility for CD and RDA staff functions impacting on both counterintelligence and production operations with the collection management staff This was done in the INSCOM Concept Plan in recognition of the fact that the preponderence of resources being affected by combat and materiel development actions were devoted to collection However the required multidiscipline collection CI and production nature of PTR CD and RDA functions as well as the need to allow the management of the functions to occur outside the pressures of day-to-day operations led to the separation of the requirements and systems functions from ODCSOPS to fonn a new staff element The DCSS was established on 3 January and consisted of Concepts and Requirements Division and Systems Division De ut Chief of Staff for Intel li ence and Threat Anal sis DCSITA U he CSI acte as t e principa a visor tote CG an exercise principal staff authorityinmatters of intelligence analysis production and dissemination developed and supervised implementation of plans and programs of INSCOM activities in these areas exercised technical overview of the Army's scientific and technical intelligence production activities and insured that the lNSCOM's intelligence production responded to and satisfied Anny needs DCSITA coordinated INSCOM participation in the Defense Intelligence Production System and also served concurrently as Corrmander Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center ODCSITA was comprised of a Management Division a Requirements Division and a Staff Control Office De ut Chief of Staff for Counterintel l i ence DCSCI U On 9 January 978 or t e sa e o consistency n t1t es o sta eads the Director Counterintelligence DCI was redesignated Deputy Chief of Staff for Counterintelligence Many organizational changes were experienced in the ODCSCI in FY 1978 On 31 October 1977 the residual assets and functions 26 034 of the fonner Office Deputy Chief of Staff Security ODCSSEC were combined with those of the Security Division DCI to fonn the Command Security Office at Arlington Hall Station On 5 January 1978 the Operations and Management Division Ft Meade was redesignated Operations Division CI and its management functions transferred to the newly designated Policy and Programs Management Division CI Ft Meade The functions being perfonned by the Assistant Chief Operations and Management Division Vint Hill Fanns Station was accomplished by the newly created Operations Division SIGSEC VHFS The Operations Division transferred its management functions to the newly created Policy and Programs Management Division SIGSEC Arlington Hall Station On 5 January the Policy and Programs Division Ft Meade was redesignated Policy and Programs Management Division Cl Ft Meade Also on 5 January resources of the Assistant Chiefs of the Policy and Programs Division located at Arlington Hall Station and Vint Hill Farms Station went into the newly established Policy and Programs Management Division SIGSEC at Arlington Hall Station Finally during the year the positions of the Assistant DCI's at Vint Hill Farms Station and Arlington Hall Station were eliminated as it was no longer necessary for the DCSCI to have his representatives on hand oversee the newly acquired elements because of their complete integration into ODCSCI The close of FY 1978 found the DCSClwith the following major elements Operations Division CI Operations Division SIGSEC Policy and Programs Management Division Cl Policy and Programs Management Division SIGSEC and Co111T1and Security Office Dual divisions for SIGSEC and CI were necessary due to the split headquarters locations The mission of the DCSCI included the directing and coordinating CI and SIGSEC activities within INSCOM The staff element also acted for the CG in the direction control monitorship and coordina_tion in the areas of signal security counterintelligence investigations operations security support security support services and polygraph activities The DCSCI was responsible to the Deputy Commanding General for Security and Production for all activities of the DCSCI and for exercising staff supervision over the US Army Central Security Facility De ut Chief of Staff Resource Mana ement DCSRM U The DCSRM was the principa staf assistant n matters pertaining to progra111T1ing budget manpower authorization control and utilization management analysis and engineering cost and economic analysis finance and accounting accounting policy control of funds and internal review The DCSRM exercised staff supervision over and assisted and advised corrrnanders in all matters relating to resource management throughout the command During FY 1978 the DCSRM maintained the same internal organization Administrative Office Cost and Economic Analysis Office Manpower Division Internal Review Division Program Analysis and Evaluation Office Budget Division Finance and Accounting Division and Management and Analysis Division 27 035 - M' M Q Q a-e @ i- JPYi QJ _ p _ of the staff element's mission The DCSADP was the principal staff assistant for the development of plans policies and procedures and for the implementation evaluation and coordination of automated systems including operations administration and logistics associated therewith in INSCOM No organizational changes took place during the year and ODCSADP continued to consist of Plans Programs and Requirements Division and Resources and Evaluation Division De ut Chief of Staff Telecommunications OCSTEL U The DCSTEL was the principa sta f assistant for a matters pertaining to the development coordination and staff supervision of all functions related to telecommunications within the command As a result of implementing Chapter 6 of the IOSS the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff Telecorrmunications was reorganized effective 1 October 1977 The ODCSTEL consisted of the following elements Plans Operations and Resources Division Communications Electronics Division Ft Meade Communications Electronics Division Arlington Hall Station Engineering and Installation Division and Administration Office U By implementing Chapter 6 spaces and resources of the DCSTEL were transferred from the HQ INSCOM TDA to the TDA of the Directorate US Army Conmunications Command-Intelligence and Security Command USACC-INSCOM At the same time the non-tactical communications functions of INSCOM were transferred to the US Ariny Conmunications Conmand Seven spaces of the fonner Tactical Division ODCSTEL remained on the HQ INSCOM TOA as the Communications Office The Di rector USACC-INSCOM and the DCSTEL were one and the same and the USACC-INSCOM personnel filled positions within ODCSTEL U The DCSTEL exercised operational control over the Conmunications Center US Ariny Garrison Arlington Hall Station and the INSCOM Detachment US Anny Communications Electronics Installation Battalion The USACC-INSCOM had operational control over the US Ariny Communications Command Detachment Arlington Hall Station and paragraph 010 of the INSCOM Detachment of the US Anny Communications-Electronics Installation Battalion Personal Staff Inspector General IG U The IG as a member of the personal staff and as Confidential Agent of the CG and DCG's inquired into and reported on matters pertaining to mission perfonnance and the state of discipline efficiency morale and economy of the conmand performed annual general inspections as prescribed by re ulations conducted special inspections as directed and perforined POM preparation for overseas movement units inspections for alerted units Throughout the report period the IG Office continued to be divided into an Assistance and Investigations Division and Inspections Division Staff Judge Advocate SJA U The SJA served as the legal advisor to the CG DCG's CofS and all staff elements of HQ INSCOM and as necessary to subordinate elements of the corrmand 28 oc 036 o I I ' o I Io 'o i t' _ o Advisor for Scientific and Cryptologic Affairs U The Advisor served as the principal advisor to the CG on scientific and cryptologic matters Command Chaplain U The Command Chaplain served as the Chaplain of the USA INSCOM and was responsible for all chaplain related activities within the command provided advice and assistance to the CG and his staff on religious moral moral leadership and human self development matters The fonner Staff Chaplain under DCSPER was on 1 April 1978 designated a Personal Staff Officer authorized direct access to the Corrmander The INSCOM Concept Plan called for a Command Chaplain This was consistent with other major commands To provide the manpower space INS COM temporarily transferred one of its two chaplain positions at FS Sinop to HQ INSCOM Once the pending HQ INS COM TOA was approved by DA and the additi ona 1 manpower requirement for Command Chaplain recognized the borrowed space could be returned to FS Sinop 1 Special Disbursing Officer SOO U The SDO served as the Special Disbursing Officer for the USA INSCOM advising the CG and DCG's on all aspects of the control administration supervision and utilization of intelligence contingency funds ICF Until 10 July 1978 control and administration of the ICF allotted to this command was provided for through the appointment of an ICF Class B Agent Officer to the local Finance and Accounting Officer Based on the requirement for functional continuity the ICF Class B Agent was filled by a civilian employee As the result of a recent inspection The Inspector General ruled that appointment of a civilian was in violation of Title 10 US Code as amended by Public Law 87-480 Since it was deemed essential that the integrity of the current control and administrative procedures for ICF be maintained through the continuity provided by a civilian employee in this position and appointment as an ICF Class B Agent Officer could not continue establishment of a special disbursing agent was considered in the best interests of this command Providing ICF support and the control and administration thereof would be the only activity of the special disbursing agent-he would not be involved in military or civilian pay matters Mr Autmer Ackley Jr o GS-13 was appointed as the Special Disbursing Officer on 10 July 1978 2 New HQ INSCOM TDA U HQ INSCOM was last reorganized under TOA ASWOOYAA CCNUM AS0177 effective 15 February 1977 The TDA failed to take into consideration the implementation of the IOSS concept which brought about the establishment of INS COM effective 1 January 1977 Thus HQ INS COM had to work for the next year and a half under a TOA that was outdated at the time of its publication During FY 1978 a great deal of effort was expended to prepare a new HQ INSCOM TOA which would reflect the consolidation of staff elements at Arlington Hall Station and Fort George G Meade Four of the several goals to be reached by the new TDA would- 1 Provide a one to five-year Interim Organization Structure pending colocation 2 refine the organizational structure to conform with the INSCOM Concept Plan and FM 101-5 guidelines 3 improve the MOS balance to reflect a 29 Ol 037 WWWW l tr J I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o fusion of disciplines and 4 provide a finn base for the pending DA manpower survey U The final document CCNUM AS0179 submitted to DA for approval incorporated the following changes 1 U A Management Information Systems Officer Army Headquarters Management Activity AHMA dictated the organization of all ADP Management Information Systems MIS spaces into a separate Support Command-the Data Support Activity The conunander of the new organization would be dual-hatted as the Management Information Systems Officer a special staff officer who operated as a key member of the INSCOM staff 2 U Audiovisual Activities A separate 000 study directive required the consolidation and centralized management of all audiovisual personnel and equipment A visual support center would be organized to include audiovisual elements currently organized under the Public Affairs Office HQ INSCOM the photographic laboratory within USAG Arlington Hall Station and the audiovisual activities at USAG Vint Hill Fanns Station 3 U The Administrative Services Administrative Services organized heretofore as a part of the DCSPER including awards records management mail and distribution and publications would be organized as a separate TOA Staff Support Activity 4 U Civilian Personnel Office Staff Civilian Personnel Office The servicing Civilian Personnel Office would be transferred from the HQ Staff to the TOA of the USAG AHS The staff Civilian Personnel Office in ODCSPER would be augmented to assume command-wide staff civilian personnel management functions 5 U Three new 06 level Assistant Deputy Chiefs of Staff offices would be established in DCSOPS and DCSCI to manage Army-wide INSCOM mission related SIGINT HUMINT and CI OPSEC activities 3 INSCOM Stationing Alternatives U On 13 February 1978 INSCOM and DARCOM were tasked to develop Case Study Justification Folders CSJF's for the stationing of the new co1T111ands created as a result of IOSS These co1T111ands included HQ INSCOM US Anny Intelligence Threat and Analysis Center ITAC US Anny Signals Warfare Laboratory SWL and US Army Electronics Materiel Readiness Activity EMRA At the same time FORSCOM was tasked to complete a study on the relocation of the 370th ASA Company Operations Rear now Co B 303d MI Bn from Vint Hill Farms Station Of six potential sites under preliminary study for 22 months the following four specific alternatives were considered 4 A U Close VHFS and terminate Army occupancy at AHS Relocate Army activities currently at AHS and VHFS to include realignment of US Anny Electronics Materiel Readiness Activity EMRA Signals 30 038 wwm _ 4A a o - Warfare Laboratory assume that 114 spaces are located at VHFS INSCOM SIGSEC assets and 370th ASA Co Ops Rear Consolidate INSCOM activities at Fort Meade Relocate US Army General Intelligence Production Detachment Fort Bragg to Fort Meade B U Tenninate Army occupancy at AHS Relocate intelligence and security activities currently at AHS and Fort Meade and consolidate the INSCOM at VHFS Relocate US Army General Intelligence Production Detachment Fort Bragg to VHFS C U Close VHFS HQ INSCOt1 split location between Fort Meade and AHS Relocate Army activities currently at VHFS to include realignment of EMRA SWL and 370th ASA Co Ops Rear Relocate INSCOM SIGSEC assets at VHFS and General Intelligence Production Detachment Fort Bragg with HQ INSCOM D U Retention of status quo U The adjusted milestone date for submission of the CSJF's to DA was 15 August 1978 The DARCOM and FORSCOM studies were completed on 19 May 1978 and furnished to INSCOM for action as prescribed by the 13 February DA tasker On 2 June 1978 a General Officer in-process review IPR was held at the Pentagon to report on progress and to identify any study problem areas requiring resolution at DA level At the IPR a summary analysis of alternatives clearly established that none of the alternatives were cost effective when the high one-time costs were compared with the estimated annual savings See Table 1 Subsequent to this IPR new guidance was provided on 27 June 1978 for a new option Alternative D as stated below The status quo option was redesignated as Alternative E D U Terminate Anny occupancy at AHS Relocate intelligence and security activities currently at AHS and Fort Meade and consolidate INSOOM at VHFS Re 1ocate EMRA from VHFS to Fort Monmouth and Tobyhanna Depot Relocate US Army General Intelligence Production Detachment Fort Bragg to VHFS SWL and Co B 303d MI Bn EW formerly 370th ASA Co Ops Rear remain at VHFS and Other alternatives may be considered in accordance with reference A para lA 5 o II Refers to 13 Feb 78 DA tasker E U Retention of status quo U Alternative D was costed and although it had the greatest personnel turbulence for HQ INSCOM it had the lowest one-time costs Under this alternative the DARCOM-prepared CSJF on SWL and the FORSCOM-prepared study on the 370th ASA Co Ops Rear would not be implemented as the affected units would not leave Vint Hill Fanns Station 31 039 _ ll'fit S M Z o ll- nm - Table 1 -Analysis of Stationing Alternatives ALTN A ALTN B ALTN C ALTN D $16 405 14 1 780 31 185 $ 9 698 12 635 22 333 $6 318 14 780 21 098 $10 309 2 a158 12 467 FYDP Construction Avoided INSCOM 12 451 4 287 12 451 4 287 Net Construction Costs Combined 18 734 18 046 8 647 8 180 2 Non-Construction Total Non-Construction INSCOM NON-INSCOM 8 007 3 642 4 379 3 469 6 557 3 642 4 396 3 035 30 383 25 894 18 846 15 611 l 969 2 273 l 984 2 643 2 316 3 603 356 2 300 276 PERSO'mEL TURBULENCE INSCOM Transfer Eliminate Reimb Support to DA NON-INSCOM Transfer New Requirements 1 250 471 128 1 366 25 112 883 370 l 361 8 112 854 74 588 74 854 74 396 22 Total Transfers plus Eliminates 2 575 1 979 2 107 1 768 OOD ONE-TIME COSTS $ in 000 l Construction Construction Reguired INSCOM NON-INS COM TOTAL 3 Total Net Construction Cost plus Non-Construction ANNUAL COST RE DU CTI ONS OMA and FHMA DIA Support at AHS Reimbursable to DA - Not included above MPA Reallocated within DA 993 2 316 U Alternative D the preferred alternative was considered to meet all of the Anny and INSCOM operational objectives of the JOSS dated l August 1975 32 ' 040 CONFIDENTIAL fr1 This alternative if implemented would terminate INSCOM's presence at AHS and would relocate 487 military and 465 civilian jobs outside the national capitol region a long time goal of OSD and the Congress It would result in a new inter-service support agreement between the Military District of Washington and the Defense Intelligence Agency permitting an anticipated recovery to Army of $1 7 million in annual costs Alternative D would also meet the DA approved INSCOM Concept Pl an objectives for1 A consolidated headquarters at a single location resulting in an integrated command staff structure-a condition not now existing 2 Centralized command and control of INSCOM subordinate units 3 Centralized resources for the direction control and accomplishment of the mission 4 Enhanced command relationships with other MACOM's their subordinate commands the Army Staff other DOD and national agencies 5 Integrated all-source amd multidiscipline staffs to manage intelligence collection and counterintelligence OPSEC support activities 6 An Anny Intelligence Production and Threat Analysis staff 7 An integrated Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center 8 An integrated Intelligence Automated Data Processing System 9 HQ INSCOM at the minimum essential authorized manpower level 10 Meeting DOD headquarters management activities objectives Intelli ence and Threat Anal sis Center ITAC Te ITAC was fanned as a resu to n ngs and cone us ons n C apter 7 of the 1975 Army Chief of Staff-directed Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study IOSS Several deficiencies were found in the Army's intelligence production system e g 1 There was no method for determining requirements or the extent to which they were being met 2 there was no adequate threat data and threat analysis support and 3 production organization resources were not being used effectively These problems were caused by a fragmentation of effort among nine Anny production and analytical organizations The reco111T1ended solution was to form an Army production center to include all elements ho 'lever a CSA decision was made to unify under INSCOM only the FORSCOM Intelligence Group later redesignated INSCOM Intelligence Group and four other OACSI-DA field operating uni ts US Army Imagery Interpretation Center US Army Intelligence Threat Analy h Detachment US Anny Intell iyence Operation Support Detachment and US Army Intelligence Support Detachment HQ INSCOM on l January 1977 These units were assigned to 33 GUNFIDENTIAL REGRADED CNCLASSIFIED ON -i-nllL - Jc 1i BY USAINSC-0 1 FOl PA Auth Para 4-10 00D 5200 lR 0 041 W ' Wl ' lil _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ on o CONFIDENTIAL U To perfonn the necessary planning for the transfer of these units an Intelligence and Threat Analysis Planning Office was fanned on 26 October 1976 within the Office of Plans Programs and Analysis OPPA HQ INSCOM Staff responsibilities soon expanded to the extent that a separate office was required On l March 1977 a provisional staff element for Intelligence and Threat Analysis was established under a Director to plan supervise manage and coordinate the activities of a provisional Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center comprised of the transferred units U The Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center Provisional was established officially by HQ INSCOM Pennanent Orders 65-2 13 September 1977 effective l October 1977 under operational control of the Director Intelligence and Threat Analysis DIRITA The provisional center served to integrate the personnel and missions of the five production and analytical organizations This integration process continued until l January 1978 at which time four of the units were discontinued and the remaining one the US Anny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Detachment was redesignated as the US Anny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center ITAC with headquarters at Arlington Hall Station Concurrently the provisional center was discontinued On 9 January 1978 the title of the staff element was changed from Director Intelligence and Threat Analysis DIRITA to Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence and Threat Analysis DCSITA The ITAC area of Building A Arlington Hall Station was accredited as a Special Activities Office SAO facility during the 4th Qtr FY 1978 This enhanced progress toward an all-source production facility fully capable of supporting the ITAC analysts with a broader and more easily accessible range of materials The mission of TAC was to process analyze produce report and disseminate all-source integrated intelligence and counterintelligence products threat analyses and imagery exploitation for DA and MACOM s in support of combat operations training planning and materiel and combat development activities to identify intelligence gaps of interest to DA and to serve as threat validation executive agent for the Department of the Anny 1 U The interim 1977 organization was restructured in April 1978 so that major elements of the Center included the Command Group Production Management Office Operations Directorate and Support Directorate At the close of FY 1978 ITAC 1 s authorized strength stood at 91 officers 25 warrant officers 126 enlisted and 185 civilians The FY 1979 budget was $72 million 10 percent of the INSCOM total The fonner OACSI Translation Services function was transferred to ITAC effective 22 January 1978 Two civilian personnel and annual contract money in the amount of $150 000 were transferred with the function Effective 27 March responsibility for dissemination of sensitive compartmented infonnation within the Anny was transferred from OACSI to the ITAC As a result INS COM provided the single point of contact in the Anny for dissemination of both collateral and special intelligence 34 CONFIDENTIAL - C-1 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED 0 -J o _ f '1U L CI f ' BY USA N'WO ' Fn PA Auth Para HO Ll JD 200 lR o _ U In spite of the functional integration of TAC and the physical integration of MDW ITAC elements the overall operation in the areas of administration and operational support continued to suffer from the inability to fully man the ITAC management and support structure The strictures against movement of personnel imposed by the lack of a stationing decision continued to be the single greatest impediment to rapid and full development of ITAC Insufficient ec litorial administrative and graphic support caused the slowdown of production output This strain on manpower was brought about primarily by the JOSS precept to improve the quality of support rendered the Anny user In order to accomplish this improvement TAC instituted a product review process which insured that- 1 the user question was answered a major production failing highlighted by the JOSS 2 the product where appropriate employed multidiscip1ines and sources and 3 the appearance of the product was professional and the material was readable In short ITAC was implementing a new methodology and was experiencing problems and shortfalls for which there were no immediate solutions However development of an ITAC word processing center was initiated a request to move five unencumbered spaces from Fort Bragg into the ITAC management was approved by DA and there was a continuing review and refinement of the TAC TOA structure and manning U At the close of FY 1978 the TAC Automated Production Management System was being fed initial data It was expected to ultimately allow for the percentile breakout of disciplines incorporated in the products and a source readout for each product U The identification of Anny user intelligence needs was a continuing process requiring many fonns of contact with a wide variety of user levels 5 Reorganization of INSCOM Liaison Offices U During Fy 1978 INSCOM underwent a major reorganization of its various liaison offices The Technical Representative West Coast and the Technical Representative US Anny Electronics Command ECOM were transferred as a part of Signals Warfare Laboratory on 1 October 1977 On that same date the INSCOM Liaison Detachment US Anny Europe was redesignated the US Army Cryptologic Support Group The INSCOM Liaison Detachment Pacific was officially discontinued on 1 April 1979 The Detachment had in reality been down to zero strength for nearly two years its functi ans being performed by INS COM Detachment Hawaii Li ai son Offices at OACS I and DAR COM were II i nheri ted 11 by I NS COM from USAINTA On 13 January 1978 INSCOM appointed a liaison officer to ACSI however at the close of the report period the liaison function was being performed as part time duty by an ODCSOPS action officer No separate manpower space was allotted the task The liaison function at DARCOM was a part of INSCOM Ft Meade Hq Support Detachment's TOA U In June 1978 1 HQ INSCOM reassessed its INSCQt 1 Liaison Officer requirements and stationing IN this process requirements for Comnand Liaison Officers were identified for FORSCOM DARCOM TRAOOC and ACSI Letters of instruction from the Co1T111ander to these liaison officers were promulgated 35 or 043 The policy of having personnel assigned to a major subordinate connand attempt to represent the Commanding General INSCOM in a liaison capacity proved impractical and was discontinued Future fonnal contacts between INSCOM and other major commands would be conducted by HQ INSCOM U At the close of FY 1978 pending approval of a new integrated TOA for HQ INSCOM the manpower spaces for liaison officers for DARCOM TRAOOC and FORSCOM remained on TDA's of other units Relocation of Arlington Hall Station Tenants U Effective 31 July 1978 the duty station of the employees of the US Army Signals Jarfare Laboratory SWL Arlington Hall Station and of the US Army Office of the Project Manager Control and Analysis Center US Army Electronics Research and Development Comnand also located at Arlington Hall Station was changed to Vint Hill Farms Station Warrenton Virginia 6 Organization Day U A CofS HQ INSCOM OF dated 29 August 1977 designated l October as Organization Day symbolic of the final integration of Army intelligence assets into a single Major Anny Command the US Army Intelligence and Security Command Personnel assigned to INSCOM units began wearing INSCOM distinctive shoulder patches and crests on that day and many units held their own organization day celebrations 7 INSCOM Personnel Clearance Facility Transferred to MILPERCEN U Effective l October 1977 the US Anny Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility CCF was established at Fort George G Meade Maryland as a field activity of the US Army Military Personnel Center MILPERCEN The mission of the CCF was to execute and recommend Army-wide policies systems and programs related to security clearances for the Department of the Anny military and civilian personnel The facility also adjudicated results of all Defense Investigative Service DIS investigations and informed requesting co11111anders of clearability status of individuals Because it perfonned adjudications for the entire Army the facility was centrally located with the investigative records at Fort Meade Although the CCF was established on 1 October personnel were not officially assigned until 12 June 1978 These included personnel from the former Personnel Clearance Facility ODCSSEC Arlington Hall Station made OPCON to INSCOM DIRCI on 6 June 1977 OPCON ta MILPERCEN CCF effective 3 October 1977 and the Personnel Security Office US Army Central Security Facility Fort Meade 8 36 rr- 044 T j I o L t I o Jo o ' o - ' o -- owo zorm r ormon1 1 r 1 0o-o o oTJ yfW1 _ ___ oo wcssclllit1lll lfllti-MD 67 o ' FOOTNOTES - CHAPTER IV - ORGANIZATION 1 2 OF CofS 3 Mar 78 subj Command Chaplain Position U Ltr IACGM HQ INSCOM Ft Meade Md 15 Apr 78 subj Request for Establishment of a Special Disbursing Agent U 3 OF CofS 1 Feb 78 subj HQ INSCOM TOA U pp 1-2 4 AHR OPPA HQ INSCOM FY78 C pp 2-2 thru 2-4 and Incl 6 to App E 5 Qtrly Prag Rev HQ INSCOM 4th Qtr FY78 C p 71 FY 1978 USAINSCOM Commanders Conference PreConference Packet S pp D-4 thru 0-7 Ann Hist Review INSCOM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMDIS pp 43-44 6 AHR USAG VHFS FY78 FOUO p 27 7 OF IACS-P 29 Aug 77 subj Fonnal Establishment of INSCOM U THE INSCOM JOURNAL Vol I No 2 Nov 77 U pp 10-11 8 AHR DCSCI HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I U pp 74-75 and Vol II C Tab JJ AHR 1-10 USACSF FY78 U App A Incl 2 AHR DCSSEC HQ INSCOM FY77 S pp 37 00 045 CHAPTER V RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT eration OMA Funds U The US Anny Intelligence and Security Cormnan s O fun ing program at the close of FY 1978 consisted of $72 254 000 in Direct Funds and $37 000 in Automatic Reimbursements for a total of $72 291 000 The table below shows a breakout of end FY 1978 direct funding by subprogram l 0 Table 2 -Direct Funding by Subprogram As of 30 Sep 78 Subprogram FY 1978 General Purpose Forces P3I Intelligence Activities P3C COMSEC P30 Other PST Training P80 Education Services $1 606 000 52 031 000 1 713 000 16 401 000 375 000 128 000 $72 254 000 P2 U Following is an audit trail from the DA dollar guidance for preparation of the FY 1978 corrmand operating budget estimate COBE to final FY 1978 Approved Funding Program AFP Program 2 Dollar Guidance - FY 78 COBE $ Transfer from P2 - P3I 66th MI Gp Realignment Transfer from EUSA - INSCOM 704th MI Det Transfer from USAREUR - INSCOM 66th MI Gp Transfer from P2 - P3C COMSEC Realignment Tvl Transfer from P2 - P2 502d MI 8n 501st Transfer from Eur - INSCOM 66th MI Gp Congress Reduction Flying Hours Program Congress Reduction Civ Strength TRACER ROUND 502d MI 8n 501st FY78 Non POL Stock Fund Price Increase 38 C WWWl R EJ 046 l L L faW MS-AJ- tw41 GBP LZM 1 280 000 73 000 363 000 8 000 11 000 118 000 8 000 66 000 20 000 53 000 63 000 28 000 FY 78 Initial AFP Ci v Pay Raise Civ Personnel Reduction Oct PBG Korean Pay Raise Korean Foreign National Separation Allowance Returned to DA Excess Funds Returned to DA Excess Funds $ Final FY 78 AFP $ 1 606 000 $ 50 384 000 1 735 000 l 0 000 29 000 3 000 10 000 73 000 50 000 Program 31 Dollar Guidance FY 78 COBE Transfer from P2 - P3I 66th MI Gp Realignment Transfer from P95 - P3I ISD PE Realignment Transfer from P2 - P38 66th MI Gp Transfer from INSCOM - USACC Crypto Corm Transfer from ELISA - INSCOM 502d MI Bn 501st TUSLOG Det 4 FY 78 Non POL Stock Fund Price Increase Congress Reduction Contract Studies Anal Congress Reduction Flying Hour Program Congress Reduction Unspecified Intel Reduction Congress Reduction Civilian and Strength Electro-Optic Program Management All Source Intel for Echelons Above Corps Transfer from INSCOM - DARCOM R D Acq Function FY 78 Non POL Stock Fund Price Increase DA FAD #25-32 16 May 77 Manpower Spt Transfer of 502d ASA Gp to USAREUR Initial FY 78 AFP Transfer to DARCOM Increase for TUSLOG Det 4 Supplemental Appropriation for Civ Pay Raise Civ Personnel Reduction Oct PBG Transfer IDHS Translation Functions from ACSI Transfer to DARCOM Travel Funds Decrease Transfer to P30 To DA for Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility Increase for Currency Reva 1uat ion Increase for Foreign National Pay Raise Increase for Korean Pay Raise Increase for Korean Foreign National Separation Allowance Travel Restoration Return to DA Excess Funds Return to DA Excess Funds 73 000 212 000 64 000 l 411 000 186 000 757 000 2 000 400 000 26 000 240 000 99 000 185 000 450 000 633 000 58 000 - 31 000 49 527 000 20 000 538 000 1 586 000 146 000 962 000 211 ooo 193 000 885 000 67 000 728 000 778 000 27 000 74 000 193 000 15 000 845 000 39 nr 047 ti W oj _ F ZtsdNII 1 men i UJW o a E tr 17 Pl Fina 1 FY 78 AFP Pi I 17 iii $ 52 031 000 i7 6 Program 3C Dollar Guidance - FY 78 COBE 2 269 000 Transfer from INSCOM - ACC Base Conmunications Transfer from P2 - P3C COMSEC Realignment Tvl Transfer from P3C - P30 Civ Pay Spt 531 000 11 000 7 000 FY 78 Initial AFP Civ Pay Supplemental Appropriation Travel Reduction Excess Funds Travel Restoration 1 742 000 65 000 6 000 94 000 6 000 Final FY 78 AFP $ l 713 000 $ 10 774 000 Program 30 Dollar Guidance - FY 78 COBE Transfer from Transfer from Transfer from Transfer from FY 78 Non POL Transfer from P2 - P30 502d MI Bn Spt 50lst INSCOM - ACSI IOSS Realignment P3C - P30 Civ Pay Spt P2 - P30 66th MI Gp Spt Stock Fund Price Increase BO P3I - P30 VHF Initial FY 78 AFP Decrease for 3 Traffic Management Spaces to MDl Supplemental Appropriation for Direct Hire Civilian Pay Raise Transfer from P3I to Cover Deficiency in CI IA 279 000 29 000 7 000 55 000 2 000 3 500 000 14 588 000 40 000 817 000 885 000 To DA for USA Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility Increase for Increase for Increase for Increase for Currency Revaluation Foreign National Pay Raise Korean Pay Raise Korean Foreign National Separation Allowance Final FY 78 AFP 230 000 231 000 101 000 11 000 38 000 $ 16 401 000 $ 442 000 Program ST Do 11 ar Gui dance - FY 78 COBE Transfer from INSCOM - TRAOOC new Equip Tng Transfer from TRAOOC - INSCOM JOSS 200 000 220 000 40 oc 048 W Qt 144 _____ UIJS - iill 1l JJUCLZ1L e Transfer from INSCOM - ACSI Tng Funds 5a000 FY 78 Initial AFP Travel Decrease DA Excess Funds Travel Restoration Excess Funds Final FY 78 AFP 437 000 40 000 36 000 40 000 26 1 000 $ 375 000 $ 119 000 Program 80 Dollar Guidance - FY 70 COBE VOTEC UFR #15 MOS Related UFR #19 Civ Education Programs 6 000 4 000 7 000 136 000 3 000 FY 78 Initial AFP Ci v Pay Raise Excess Funds Final FY 78 AFP i 11 ooo 128 000 U The following table reflects direct obligations by element of expense for FY 1978 $ in thousands Obligation of $72 108 000 and Annual Funding Program of $72 254 000 resulted in an obligation rate of 99 8 percent Table 3 -Direct Obligations by Element of Expense FY 1978 Element of Exeense Civ Pay Benfits P30 P3C P8T PBO P3I 96 10 955 927 84 972 359 328 Rents Comm Utilities 14 872 14 22 Contr Svcs 172 407 300 1 208 3 453 34 Travel Trans Supplies Equip 6 P2 Total 1 574 59 21 083 33 120 % of Grand Total 45 9 2 361 4 111 5 7 1 372 2 294 3 2 37 15 837 16 753 23 2 19 11 113 15 830 22 0 353 122 51 766 72 108 100 0 3 16 659 1 634 41 nr Total 049 7 Militar Construction A MCA U At the close of the fiscal year the fol owing pro ects were in the construction phase at locations indicated Gennany A C Rehab - Augsburg $614 000 Korea Hangar $606 1 000 Relocatable BEQ's $1 864 1 000 Okinawa A C Rehab $715 000 CONUS Fuel Conversion - Vint Hill Fanns Station $118 000 Sewage Treatment Plant - Vint Hill Fanns Station $960 000 U In Gennany the air-conditioning upgrade of Augsburg was in final design with completion scheduled for 1st Qtr FY 1979 In Korea both active projects supported the move of the 146th Aviation Company to US Anny Field Station Korea The hangar was completed in the fourth quarter as was the first unit of the BEQ's At Okinawa the air-conditioning rehab and upgrade was underway Both CONUS projects were at Vint Hill Fanns Station The dual fuel conversion which would give the boiler plant the capacity to revert to oil firing whenever natural gas was interrupted was completed during the 4th Qtr FY 1978 For a long time the sewage treatment plant was on hold based on the possible closure of Vint Hi 11 Farms Station but as the year ended bids were in and the contract should be awarded and work commence in 1st Qtr FY 1979 2 Family Housing Units U This command operated and maintained family housing units at Arlington Hall Station and Vint Hill Fanns Station Funds were also received from DA for leased housing The Annual Funding Program for these units for FY 1978 was $622 000 of which $611 000 was obligated 98 2 percent 3 Manpower Program U Based on the 22 May 1978 DA Program and Budget Guidance as changed by other DA correspondence the INS COM Manpower Program stood at the following levels for 30 September 1978 4 1 U Program 2 General Purpose Forces Manpower resources a unted to 960 spaces This authorization will decrease by 94 enlisted spaces n FY 1979 due to the loss of temporary spaces that were loaned to INSCOM to implement IOSS 2 U Program 3 Intelligence and Communications Manpower resources amounted to 9 555 spaces for FY 1978 or an increase of 315 spaces over FY 1977 The increase was mainly due to the re-acquisition of USAG Vint Hill Fanns Station from DARCOM 42 00 050 CONFIDENTIAL - 3 U Program 6 Research and Development spaces were transferred out of INSCOM Under JOSS all R D 4 U Program 8 Training Medical and Other Personal Activities stayed at the FY 1977 level of 22 total authorizations 5 U Program 9 Administration and Associated Activities Also under IOSS these 31 spaces were converted to Program 3 and INSCOM no longer had any P-9 resources 6 U Joint Activity Program 3 Army Support to NSA The 708 spaces included 23 more than F 7 due to changes in the mission U Military Strength by Program The table below reflects authorized and assigned military strength by program Shortfalls existed in all program elements except the training subelement of Program a 5 Table 4 -Military Strength by Program Program 2 3 8 Gen Purpose Forces Cryptologic Activity AMHA CCP HUMINT Imagery Intelligence Intel Production Actv Intel Data Handling Sys COMSEC Base Ops CI IA AMHA I RA Others Spt to NSA Training Family Housing TOTAL Authorized Actual 955 4 923 194 612 55 145 45 225 227 1 062 6 708 12 3 780 4 757 164 557 42 104 9 172 8 463 Plus Minus -175 -166 - 30 - 55 -- 13 41 - 3 - 51 - 85 - 69 - 164 - 42 174 142 993 2 692 12 2 - 1 -709 Command Personnel Situation ower trends in FY 1978 continued downward Authorized and actual total corranand strengths for FY 1977 and FY 1978 are shown below 6 Authorized Actual OFF WO 1 063 1 016 461 456 30 September 1977 ENL TOT MIL 9 447 8 730 7 923 7 258 CIV GRAND TOTAL 1 797 1 749 10 479 11 244 Full time permanent and temporary direct hire including direct hire Foreign Nationals and US Force dependents filling foreign national indirect hire positions r -1 lJ 43 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON u 1 tL1 L D c 1JPY BY USAINSC0 -1 FO PA Auth Para 4-10 DOD 5200 IR CONFIDENTIAL UM JPY MSlWwaau a CJ f CONFIDENTIAl - OFF Authorized Actual 1 058 899 140 30 September 1978 EN TOT MIL 472 7 807 435 7 129 9 337 8 463 CIV GRAND TOTAL 1 417 1 280 10 754 9 743 Does not include Wage Board and Foreign Nationals FN Assigned totals as of 30 Sep 78 Wage Board orldwide - 146 FN direct hire - 101 FN indirect hire - 392 U For FY 1978 command personnel strength by unit see appendix F INS COM Key Personnel U Appendix G contains a listing of personnel occupying key positions within the command as of 30 September 1978 Communications Programs and Resources U The Directorate US Army Communications Command-Intelligence and Security Conmand USACC-INSCOM was the Program Manager within USACC for Program Element PE 381055A Cryptologic Communications Army This program was divided into two subelements SE The SE-49 Cryptologic Communications NON-DCS included all telecommunications resources except cryptographic equipment required to provide operate and maintain ACC fixed station Special Intelligence communications The SE-54 Cryptologic Communications DCS included funds necessary to support leased or government owned communications circuits to include AUTODIN subscriber tails and other circuits in support of the cryptologic effort but did not include AUTODIN backbone costs U Although the Consolidated Cryptologic Program CCP manpower levels remained austere there was relative stability in PE 381055A during FY 1978 The only significant change resulted from restoration of SE-49 spaces originally deleted in anticipation of various remoting proposals As these anticipated remoting plans slipped a decision was made to restore program spaces and address future reductions only after planned remoting plans were actually approved for implementation U With the exception of seven SE-49 spaces comprising the CommunicationsElectronics CE Division fonnerly Tactical Division INSCOM all INSCOM cryptologic communications manpower resources were transferred to US Anny Communications Command effective l October 1977 in accordance with Chapter 6 of the JOSS U During FY 1978 only one action impacted upon Other Procurement Anny OPA funding Project ADVENTURER was integrated into the NSA Project FASTBACK Associated OPA dollars $2 021 000 were reallocated to this project Also during FY 1978 all PE 381955A funds were apportioned to NSA for budgetary management Major expenditures of these funds included STREAMLINER equipment and associated maintenance and test equipment Model 40 Teletypewriters and a secure telephone system for USA Field Station Augsburg and USA Field Station Berlin The total FY 1978-84 OPA program 44 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 052 SC L i -V1llL GBP -C t BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR L ' C for PE 381055A as of 30 September 1978 1 is depicted in the table below in thous ands Table 5 -0PA Funding - PE 381055A Item FY 78 FY 79 FY 80 FY 81 FY 82 FY 83 Secure Phones 242K 200K Comm Sys Im560K provement 982K 125K 757K 480K 2 021K transferred to Project FASTBACK ADVENTURER 108K 357K STREAMLINER Test Equip 60K 137K 130K 140K 0 TOTAL 31 413K 12254K 125K 887K - 620K FY 84 512K 0 145K 31 K 657K -31 K U FY 1978 Operations and Maintenance Anny OMA funds were approved at a level of $544 000 for telecoll11lunications projects and supplies TOY and various support services In addition $451 000 were approved for civilian compensation Project STREAMLINER U NSACSS established the STREAMLINER program under Program Management Directive 3-73 20 June 1973 Project STREAMLINER had the broad objective of improving communications in support of the Consolidated Cryptologic Program tt re specifically the project was designed to reduce writer-to-reader time conservation of point-to-point transmission facilities and enhance communications reliability U Under the program management concept NSA had the overall management responsibility The Service Cryptologic Agencies SCA's were responsible for the installation test and acceptance of all peripheral equipments associated with the system site preparation of the ties to accommodate the STREAMLINER system and operation and maintenance of the system after implementation The STREAMLINER system consisted of three types of configuration-Small Automated Communications Tenninal SACT Medium Automated Communications Terminal MACT and Large Automated Communications Terminal LACT 8 U The installation of the STREAMLINER systems at INSCOM field stations was complete The USA Field Station Pyong Taek in Korea was the first site to receive a STREAMLINER system and USA Field Station Berlin was the last Implementation dates were as follows t Station Slstem Installed USAFS Korea USAFS Augsburg Arlington Hall Station USAFS Okinawa USAFS Berl in MACT 32 chan LACT 48 chan LACT i 48 chan LACT 48 chan LACT 48 chan l Imelementation Date 24 31 25 7 27 Feb Mar May Nov Apr 45 rr 053 5 @ 23 77 77 77 77 78 r _ _ vo- o 1e- r n mrar Oiiiif Ctr7it Strrucr rn scsmoo ff III SC Project LE NADE U Project LEMONADE was the approved p1an that provided red multiplexing and bulk encryption of selected CRITICOM circuits The objective of the project was to obtain savings in communications manpower leased circuit costs equipment space and energy without degradation of cormnunications service INSCOM sites designated to be multiplexing hubs were USAFS Berlin three trunks USAFS Augsburg four trunks USAFS Korea four trunks and USAFS Okinawa three trunks During FY 1978 trunks installed the previous year were activated at USAFS Okinawa and USAFS Korea This brought the total number of trunks activated to four at USAFS Augsburg three at USAFS Berlin two at USAFS Korea and one at USAFS Okinawa The activation of the remaining trunks for INSCOM stations were deaayed pending the installation of LEt ONADE equipment at connecting stations Resource Management Officer U Over the last 30 years comptrollership in the Department of the Army evolved in divergent fonns among the various MACOM's The statutory base for comptroller functions was defined in the National Security Act of 1947 and subsequent amendments The position of Comptroller was established by this Act The Comptroller was charged with the responsibility for budgeting accounting internal audit and progress and statistical reporting The additional responsibility to maintain an adequate system of fund control grew from the budgeting and accounting functions included in the National Security Act Over the years new functions including Progranming Management Engineering and Cost Economic Analysis have become associated with the Comptrollership More recent initiatives by some convnands to establish a single organizational element to be responsible for all resource management functions have combined Manpower Management with those of the Comptroller On 1 December 1976 the Deputy Chief of Staff Comptroller HQ INSCOM was disestablished and the Deputy Chief of Staff Resource Management DCSRM was established in its place DCSRM assumed new finance and review functions and those dealing with manpower management U Organizational structures for the combined resource management functions vary widely within the Anny This situation was reflected in the divergent resource management organizations functions and methods being brought together by Anny-wide elements forming INSCOM and dictated that these concepts be applied with consistency throughout the new INSCOM organizational structure U In early FY 1978 HQ INSCOM directed the establishment of Resource Management Officers OO's within the organization of each major subordinate command activity Organizational concept and definitions with regard to the resource management functions in INSCOM were outlined in a HQ INSCOM letter IARM-P 28 October 1977 subject INSCOM Resource Management Organization and Functions Resource management represented the role involving all managers in considering the effective and efficient use of manpower and financial resources in the accomplishment of their assigned missions and functions The key elements of the letter were as follows 46 u a ot oo o n - rdttl t t Wl Mrt UTS PP Cf Z i1il %K tfrdJ f#Nt 4 fs#$Tttfi HJMfi'ffWl ftft1lftt- - l U The Resource Management Officer at each organizational level would be a principal staff officer and would be responsible for coordinating resource planning distributing controlling reviewing and evaluating the utilization of command resources The INSCOM RMO function would be organized as a separate staff entity in those co1T1T1ands units with a functional coordinating staff In smaller commands where a full time position was not required the Commander Deputy COITITlander or Executive Officer might assume the RMO functions 2 U The Rr-U would not be subordinate to any other staff element 3 U The RMO would be responsible for manpower authorization utilization and control within the unit in addition to the more traditional functions associated with the management of financial resources U The subordinate commands faced several problems during the implementation phase One was the lack of qualified financial management officers and another was the necessity of taking the required spaces out of their own resources It was anticipated that time would bring an upgrade in number of qualified candidates but for the time being the positions were largely filled by military officer and NCO although there were a few civilians 10 Automatic Data Processing Activities U During the latter part of FY 1978 the Deputy Chief of Staff Automated Data Processing DCSADP and the INSCOM Data Syst ms Activity spent a great deal of effort preparing for a major reorganization of ADP resources and functions which would take place with the approval of a pending HQ INSCOM TOA In fact unofficially functions were beginning to be carried out as the reorganizations had already taken place As in FY 1977 the lack of personnel hindered ADP activities throughout FY 1978 U Highlights of ADP support provided during FY 1978 included the decision to changeover the current punched card machine PCM on-site at the Intelligence Reports Repository IRR Fort George G Meade to an automated process centered around the ASA Hewlett Packard HP21 MX mini computer Equally important was the decision to develop the civilian PCM operators via an upward mobility program into data processing professionals in computer operations and progranming analysis U In support of HQ INSCOM the FY 1978 workload of executing production job streams increased nearly 350 percent over the FY 1976 level This meant that priorities had to be given to existing production systems upon which customers were dependent at the expense of new developments Investigation of the possibility of doing requirements by contract was explored hONever processing delays appeared to prohibit successful use of contracts Although there was a backlog of jobs due to manpower shortages there would have been a limit placed upon production by the fact that the computer was reaching a point of saturation and being down due to age At 47 00 055 ' ' r'' __ I ' J I o ' ' ' ' the close of FY 1978 attempts to find an alternative upgraded system through DA or NSA channels had failed R e l During FY 1978 LAFINE WINE Lfl l II software development proceeded Yng lines outlined in a division of effort agreement between USA Field Station I land the CONUS development team The CONUS team developed processing modules for collecting external and intra-station communications The USA Field Station software team assumed responsibility for the following modules reports generation analytic aids computational aids target identification and data base administration U The following major program decisions were made regarding LFl II during FY 1978 1 U After LFW II software simulations revealed that the Central Processing Unit CPU was marginally adequate negotiations ensued between NSA and INSCOM which resulted in a swap of the LFl II 370 145 plus cash for an NSA 370 158 scheduled for upgrade to a 3033 2 ISG1 IThe LFW II Configuration Control Board was established with NSA R42 as chairman and NSA T31 HQ INSCOM and USA Field Station c Jas board members b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86- 3 U Due to the cancellation of EELPOT it was decided that LFl II would be designed and implemented as a stand alone DF system 11 36 1 L __ _ _ _ ManagementByObjectives Program U Management by Objectives was adopted as a principal means of management within the INSCOM This program was promulgated by the publication of INSCOM Circular 5-1 and distributed to all elements of the command by a cover letter from the Commanding General on 9 May 1977 The Circular announced the INSCOM goals tasked each unit reporting to this Headquarters to develop internal objectives in support of the goal and foNard them to this Headquarters exempted former USAINTA elements from the program until 1 October 1977 in light of the USAINTA Key Command Management Objectives program which was in being at the time and made the requirement for the submission of an annual SUlllllary status report U Implementation of the Program met with varing degrees of success It was hampered by the large number of unit reorganizations taking place the four-month exemption for the former USAINTA elements a number of changes of command during the surrmer months and the lack of adequate feedback to the Headquarters 12 Organizational Effectiveness U Organizational Effectiveness OE refers to the systematic military application of selected management and behavioral science skills and methods to improve how an organization functions to accomplish assigned missions and increase combat readiness From 1975 to 1977 about 200 Organi zat i ona l Effectiveness Staff Officers OESO were trained 056 4-JPY c wuwn s 23ii1 e Anny-wide and assigned to a variety of levels in the Anny These trained advisors are now available to assist comanders in assessing and improving their procedures In compliance with paragraph 2-8b AR 600-76 Organizational Effectiveness Activities and Training dated 8 November 1977 HQ INSCOM and several subordinate organizations initiated actions to convert spaces to provide OE support within the command Eight spaces were submitted to HQDA for conversion on the FY 1979 TAADS documents HQDA would authorize one NCO space for the Headquarters in addition to the converted spaces U On 19 October 1977 the INSCOM Organizational Effectiveness Plan was published This plan provided further guidance on the implementation of OE activities and training identified objectives which would contribute to the institutionalization of OE within the command established milestones assigned responsibility for actions and provided infonnation on desired results for each objective 13 INSCOM Officer Fellowshiy Program U The INSCOM Officer Fellowship Program was established on 3 December 1976 to identify a select few highly capable military intelligence officers cryptologists counterintelligence HUMINT etc in the grade of captain who would be provided widely diversified experience by one-year rotating assignments to three of the following staff elements Chief of Staff Deputy Chief of Staff Operations Deputy Chief of Staff Resource Management Deputy Chief of Staff Management Information Systems and Deputy Chief of Staff Logistics These assignments would prepare participants for earlier attendance to the Command and General Staff College and for subsequent high level command and staff assignments Through this intensive personnel management INSCOM was enabled to play a more direct role in the early development of outstanding MI officers During FY 1977 three officers were nominated and accepted for the program The fourth officer CPT Howard B Lavy was appointed to the program in August 1978 14 General and Field Grade Officer Promotions U A comparison between FY's 1976 l97T 1 1977 and 1978 general and field grade officer promotions are reflected in the table below Only the FY 1977 and FY 1978 figures include all officers assigned to INSCOM 15 Table 6 -General and Field Grade Officer Promotions Promotion To FY 1976 FY 197T FY 1977 General Officer Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Major 1 5 12 45 0 8 15 19 2 19 15 MI 26 22 MI 32 24 Ml No Selection Board 49 057 FY 1978 1 34 23 MI 56 50 MI PDMJS RE P fJWfNJ ffJ ftfl fttW - ZS rarerc Enlisted Strength Su1T1T1ary U The assigned enlisted strength on 30 September 1978 was 7 129 against a Command Program authorization of 7 712 for a 92 4 percent fill This compared to a beginning fiscal year strength of 7 116 assigned against a Program Budget Guidance authorization of 7 537 or a 94 4 percent fill The geographical distribution of enlisted resources at the end of FY 1978 is shown below 16 Table 7 -Enlisted Strength By Geographical Area Area Authorized Assigned CONUS Europe Pacific Turkey Canal Zone TSA Worldwide 2 693 2 941 1 950 73 55 0 2 337 2 864 1 I 765 76 75 _1_2 TOTAL 7 712 7 129 No-Show Problem Among Reassigned Personnal U A considerable number of gains assigned through the Centralized Assignment Procedures CAP III System either did not arrive or failed to arrive during the report month reflected on CAP III assignment rosters which impaced upon the mission management capability of the gaining INSCOM units Failure of gains to arrive when scheduled resulted in last minute requests to this headquarters and or NSA for mission reduction realignment based on personnel shortages U The problem was concentrated in three major areas The first was AIT students who were subject to recycle academic drops security holds etc The average AIT advanced individual training student arrived at the gaining command 45-60 days after the date specified in the assignment instructions The problem was referred to MILPERCEN for corrective action A manual tracking or randomly selected 05H students proved to MILPERCEN that the problem was not isolated to a small number of students but was of sufficient magnitude to be categorized as the rule rather than the exception U A second problem lay with 50 percent of the soldiers appearing on CAP III assignment but who were not eligible They had been placed on orders based on erroneous data from the Enlisted Master File Consequently MILPERCEN was having to place 140 soldiers on orders to fill 100 requirements U The third and most critical problem area was the deletion and defennent system Timely submission of this data was critical if the gaining co1T1T1ander was to get additional nominees against his requisitioned requirements before they aged out of the system In January 1978 an appeal was made to unit commanders to get involved and to insure that the records of personnel 50 058 war rmrnmw rrmnrmn 1 -- o - under their conmand were correct and that requests for deletion defennent were processed within the time limits specified by HQDA New procedures were being developed within MILPERCEN to improve the de1etion defennent system and were expected to be implemented during 1st Qtr FY 1979 One of the primary elements of the revised system would require a notification to MILPERCEN indicating the status of every soldier in receipt of CAP III assignment instructions An inquiry would be generated automatically to the losing command for soldiers within 60 days of movement date but for whom no action had been taken to defer delete or confinn their ability to move 17 Reenlistment Rates U This conmand continued to 1 have reenlistment problems during FY 1978 The table belog shows INSCOM s FY 1978 reenlistment rate compared by subordinate units 1 Table 8 -Subordinate Unit Reenlistments FY 1978 Suber Comd by size l' Jtij First Tenners Reenl %Obj Obj Careerists Reenl %Obj Group I USAG AHS CONUS MI Gp USAFS Augsburg USAFS Berlin USAFS Okinawa 66th MI Gp 501st Ml Gp 25 11 63 98 146 36 68 13 41 45 23 73 46 06 11 47 49 23 52 22 41 43 81 73 46 33 48 33 76 125 45 92 71 89 01 58 74 119 82 104 68 41 59 21 75 80 92 46 03 47 93 87 29 30 71 61 80 01 77 62 83 11 69 73 137 93 87 74 132 52 5 97 7 23 2 54 14 07 9 42 60 26 13 62 09 6 6 2 8 11 23 3 0 100 50 82 99 78 74 56 85 116 77 38 17 22 03 0 0 27 08 14 52 3 39 26 99 7 94 67 78 85 63 12 89 18 6 3 15 10 49 50 10 66 47 41 32 88 50 55 58 125 94 72 29 58 39 77 58 2 58 o 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 l 1 5 8 7 2 49 4 73 98 5 97 9 75 12 22 5 59 21 14 102 4 83 75 82 05 57 58 0 0 46 80 Group II HQ INSCOM - Meade USAITAC TUSLOG Oet 4 USAG VHFS USAFS t-1isawa USAFS San Antonio 902d MI Gp 500th MI Gp Group Ill INSCOM Det Hawaii CSG USAREUR Pers Det Ft Di X Pers Det Ft Jax Pers Det Ft LWood USAFS Homestead 470th MI Gp SIGSEC Activity 40 16 45 45 2 4 40 1 46 6 41 o o 0 97 0 3 1 103 09 51 059 '%1'11Wii L W P l tt tl INWWWU 41%JPYDL4Wl'ff 9 PIE wt ------ - AMtJ@IJ ZEM' EL-Wll IWWWK 4 1J - Subordinate Unit Reenlistments FY 1978 -Continued Obj COMMAND TOTAL First Tenners Reen 1 % Obj 539 13 Obj - 308 Careerists Reenl % Obj -- 766 73 57 13 605 78 91 Recruitment Posture by ft S U Although INSCOM was not in the recruiting business it continuously monitored recruitment results and remedial DA enlistment incentives programs to insure that emphasis was placed on problem areas Effective in July 1978 MILPERCEN granted authority to recruit 200 non-high school graduates in MOS 05H and at the close of FY 1978 36 personnel had been enlisted The table below depicts the INSCOM recruitment posture by critical ft S's 19 Table 9 -Recruitment by MOS FY 1978 MOS Quota Enlistments 33S 050 OSG 05H OSK 96B 96C 960 98C 98G 98J 196 198 116 1 034 252 551 347 209 635 1 033 68 173 181 110 886 233 530 119 149 588 976 66 % of Fi 11 88 91 95 86 92 96 34 71 93 95 97 U The table below reflects the 98G recruitment by language ski 11 Table 10 -Recruitment by Language MOS 98G Language Enlistment Quota 4 French 417 Russian 97 Chinese Mandarin 158 Gennan 27 Czech 21 Arabic-Syrian 47 Arabic-Egyptian 178 Korean 40 Polish 36 Spanish American 8 Vietnamese-Hanoi 1 033 TOTAL 6 2 417 80 158 27 18 39 175 33 19 8 976 - Training seats available on REQUEST System 52 r-r 060 % of Fil 1 50 100 82 5 100 100 85 7 83 98 82 3 52 8 100 95 Critical MOS Shortages U The most critical shortage confronting the command in the 98 Career Management Field CMF was MOS 05H Morse Interceptor This shortage was a continuation of a problem which surfaced originally in March 1977 The shortage was most significant at USAFS -I I and USAFS San Antonio where considerable mission was lost because of operator shortage USAFS I Ihad an average monthly assigned strength of 253 6 against an average authorization of 303 8 The average monthly fill was 83 4 percent of authorization USAFS San Antonio had an average monthly assigned strength of 235 5 against an average authorization of 323 3 The average monthly fill for the fiscal year was 72 8 percent At the end of 2d Qtr FY 1978 only 81 percent of the Amy-manned collection requirements were being met It was necessary to close 33 collection positions at USJ-783 in San Antonio 15 positions at FS C and 3 positions at FSi I Each position closure represented approximately five billets The closure of these positions seriously affected INSCOM's ability to maintain SIGINT order-of-battle on certain Soviet mil b 1 Per itary targets and the People's Republic of China The shortage of personNSA b nel not only limited the amount of intercept collected but it also eroded 3 50 the SIGINT community's flexibility to satisfy new intelligence requirements and its all important technical base USC 3024 ' i b Pressure on the DA staff to meet the 05H requirements of the command 3 P L 86 ch was initiated in FY 1977 continued Most notable of these actions -36 was a back channel message of 23 March 1978 from MG Rolya to MG Paul S Williams Jr Director Personnel Management DCSPER DA and a letter from Vice Admiral Inman Director NSACSS to the Secretary of the Amy on 14 April 1978 The results of these and prior efforts resulted in a review of the MOS 05H from the perspectives of long range TAADS projects recruitment objectives qualification standards course qualifications attrition rate and even the sick call rate FY 1978 saw recrui bnent objectives raised by 200 to accommodate authorization of enlistment of non-high school graduates CONUS tactical units were denuded of t S OSH personnel and utilized under the Peacetime Utilization Program directed by DCSPER DA Despite almost two years of continual discussion MILPERCEN projected the command to have only a 85 percent fill of the 31 December 1977 authorization by 31 December 1978 This meant that FS 7and FS San Antonio would still be undennanned In addition extraor nary measures to lessen the irrrnediate impact of these shortages were undertaken including elongating work schedules and assigning Navy and Air Force resources where possible to forestall more position closures Potential utilization of reserve personnel was another area explored by the SCA 1 s INSCOM AFSS and Naval Security Group representatives met at Hq AFSS prior to a 28 February 1978 conference with NSA representatives and were unable to identify sufficient resources to offer practical assistance to Consolidate Security Operations Center CSOC manning 1 I U Another area of interest within the 98 CMF was the shortage of language qualified traffic analysts MOS 98C Of the 947 MOS 98C authorized as of 53 - --7 jff WCJ 30 September 1978 267 were designated as requiring language qualifications The assigned strength as of 30 September 1978 was 180 67 percent Unlike the 98G who had to be qualified for language training prior to enlistment the 98C had to be qualified only for training for his MOS This procedure made it extremely difficult to identify qualified personnel for input to language training upon completion of the basic traffic analysis course The fill of these requirements was hampered also by the reliance on 98C linguist volunteers as opposed to a definitive program to meet these requirements The problem was referred to MILPERCEN for resolution As a result of this referral MILPERCEN directed that every 98C in the inventory be administered the Defense Language Aptitude Test DLAT which could be the first step towards directed language training for qualified personnel Because of the length of training time for linguists no significant improvement could be obtained from an improved program for 12 to 15 months after adoption U MOS 978 CI Specialist and MOS 97C HUMINT Specialist with a 74 7 percent and 58 6 percent fill respectively at the close of the fiscal year were the two major problem areas in this CMF A major deterent to the personnel fill was reliance solely on a recruit from within program The convnand submitted a study to the DA staff on recommended measures to increase the Army-wide fill and subsequently the INSCOM fill in these MOS The study addressed the program from recruitment to assignment and retention Although several meetings were held on this subject and DA was receptive to most of INSCOM's recomendations little real progress was made by the close of the year U Shortages in the DA MOS especially the maintenance and ADP career fields plagued the comand much of the year One of the primary deterents to increased personnel fill in these MOS was the fact that until April 1978 the MP tfl Branch of MILPERCEN managed the total INSCOM requirements This was contrary to the MILPERCEN structure which provided for management enti rely by CMF As long as the MP MI Branch processed the command requirements INSCOM requisitions were always out of phase with other Army requirements thus negating the value of a higher DA Army Master Priority List DAMPL rating With the transfer of DA MOS from MP MI Branch to the appropriate CMF there was a noticeable improvement in fill of these requirements The affects of the transfer was readily apparent in the 74 CMF Data Processing which slowly eroded under the control of the MP MI Branch but improved significantly when placed under the control of the CMF 74 managers 20 Enlistment and Reenlistment Incentives U At the close of FY 1978 the tables below depict the enlistment and reenlistment monetary incentives that were in effect 21 t 54 r 062 oii io f ' - Io ' ' '' o o'I ' Table 11 -Enlistment-Incentives Incentive MOS 05D 05H 96C 98G EW SIGINT Ident Location Operator EW SIGINT Interceptor Interrogator EW SIGINT Voice Interceptor Korean Russian Czech Chinese Mandarin Arabic-Syrian $1 500 $1 500 $2 500 $2 500 $2 500 $1 500 $1 500 $1 500 Table 12 -Reenlistment Incentives Bonus MOS OSH 33S 96C 96D 97B 97A 98C 98G EW SIGINT Morse Interceptor EW Intercept Systems Repair Interrogator Image Interpreter Counterintelligence Agent Area Intelligence Specialist EW SIGINT Specialist EW SIGINT Voice Interceptor Arabic-Syrian Chinese Mandarin Czech Korean Polish Spanish American Russian Gennan 4A 28 2A 3A 4A 28 2A 3A 4B Zone A applies to 1st Tenners 6 or less years active service at ETS Zone B applies to career soldiers 6-10 years active service at ETS The numerical multiplier times the service member's monthly base pay at time of reenlistment determined the amount of bonus Additional Skill Identifiers U The new Additional Skill Identifiers ASI in the table belCM were established by DA based on recommendations by this comnand under the provisions of AR 611-201 to identify the specialized skill requirements of selected duty positions within the INSCOM and those personnel qualified to fill the positions 22 55 OP 063 Wiii i$ J J'J4 LUZ J Table 13 -Additional Skill Identifiers ASI Title K6 LS NS N6 N8 R4 U9 Rl R7 D4 05 Associated MOS Date Approved Eff Date Sr Non-Morse Coll ector Control ler Automated HFDF Systems Operator EELPOT IATS System Controller LEFOX Collection and Processing Sys Maint IATS Systems Maint Automated HFDF Sys Maint EELPOT ICR Non-Morse Operator MOD 370 Teletypewriter Ma int OCCS Maint Data Acquisition System AN GSQ-76 Maint Voice Intercept Position EASTLACK Maint OSK 17 Oct 77 1 Sep 78 05D 05H 17 Oct 77 21 Nov 77 1 Sep 78 33S 33S 21 Nov 77 21 Nov 77 l Sep 78 l Sep 78 33S OSK 21 Nov 77 24 Mar 78 1 Mar 79 31J 34F 13 Apr 78 13 Apr 78 l Mar 79 l Mar 79 33S 18 Jul 78 l Oct 79 33S 18 Jul 78 1 Oct 79 l Sep 78 1 Sep 78 U INS COM proponent ASI 's shown below were revised to more accurately identify the duties with which associated or to update associated training course date The following table reflects the revisions Table 14 -Revised Additional Skill Identifiers ASI R9 K9 Y4 M9 Q4 T9 Ul Revision To delete association with 31J and 34F Retitled STRAWHAT Maintenance To add USAISD Course 231-FlO To delete association with MOS 98C To change description and prerequisite for award To amend title and add USAISD Course 102-F25 To correct course data To correct course data U A request was forwarded to DA for approval on 3 May 1978 for the establishment of a new ASI entitled Specialized Teletype Equipment Maintenance associated MOS 31J Also forwarded for approval on 7 August 1978 was the action to authorize award of ASI VS to qualified personnel in MOS 32F Approval of both actions was pending at year's end Contract Training U MILPERCEN showed an inability to identify sufficiently qualified personnel to fill INSCOM's requirements for contractor 56 00 064 training Throughout FY 1978 MILPERCEN selected less than fully qualified personnel to attend contractor training In many cases these individuals were below grade levels authorized on unit TDA's and did not possess the background required to absorb the contractor training Of further concern was the fact that a number of these contractor trained personnel were diverted to other assignments before being utilized in their contractor acquired skills Through inforn1al agreement with MILPERCEN in early FY 1978 all INSCOM contract training requirements whether TOY enroute or TDY and return to home station were routed through MILPERCE L On 4 April 1978 MILPERCEN directed that procedures for training of personnel in a TDY and return status be revised From 4 April 1978 through the end of FY 1978 these requirements were coordinated directly with TRADOC USAISD and MILPERCEN was infonned if a change in availability date was required 23 Language Training U The most significant language training action in FY 1978 was the lmplementation of INSCOM s In-Country Language Training ICLT program in Europe This four-part program consisted of the following l Full time intern1ediate level Gennan training in Berlin Goethe Institute 2 short intensive Russian refresher upgrade courses at the US Arn1y Russian Institute in Gannisch 3 attendance at a civilian seminar on Russian language and culture and 4 short full or part time courses taught at unit locations by instructors from the USAREUR Office of the Anny Continuing Education System ACES 24 1 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 use 3024 i b 3 P L 86 -36 Czech Lin uist Shorta e S-EUR-CO Throughout FY 1977 USA Field Station suffered a c ronic shortage of Czechoslovakian linguists MOS '- 9 G--cc x ---- FS authorization of 45 Czech linguists including eight from USAREUR MUDPACK requirement fell to as low as 59 percent of authorization during the 3d Qtr FY 1977 MOS 98G-CX fill during the year averaged approximately 68 percent Over the same period Czech multichannel intercept increased 60 percent while single channel increased 20 percent S-eCO In a July 1977 meeting held at NSA and attended by INSCOM and MILPERCEN re resentatives it was a reed u on that FS --- - - --- - would rece ve first priority on 98G-CX fills This occurred Qtr FY 1978 had received its authorized manpower of 98G-CX In addition many of these were experienced personnel which aided appreciably in the quality of work accomplished The Czech tape backlog was done away with more by default than by actual processing the material The introduction of the LEFOX PURPLE system in August 1977 made it impossible to retain materia overt ree days After this time frame the system would require the computer space for more current data 25 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 065 use 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 'iir _ i tT HANDLE V I A NLY b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 The 142d Militar Intelli ence Lin uist Com an Utah National Guard U T e 2d M tary nte igence ngu1st Company ta National Guard had an authorized strength of 46 officers and 144 enlisted men More importantly the active members of the unit possessed a reading and speaking capability in 23 languages and each had a SECRET clearance Upon discovering the unique resources offered by the unit INSCOM sought and obtained an MOU with the National Guard Bureau FORSCOM and the State of Utah which would allow direct contact and tasking between INSCOM and the 142d Company Upon signature of the MOU in September 1978 the TAREX Office at HQ INSCOM shipped 30 open source military-related documents to the unit for translation 27 Transfer of US Anny Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies USAIAREES U By message dated 15 December 1976 C NCOSAREUR requested that the US Army Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies be transferred to another command This would be in keeping with USAREUR's desired policy of having only the responsibility for activities which contributed to its mission AS USAIAREES was a Field Operating Agency FOA of the Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence OACSI the Institute's military personnel were assigned to a non-USAREUR unit identification code However the civilians working at the school 6 DA civilian professors 5 local wage rate LWR instructors 2 DA civilian support personnel and 8 LWR support personnel were presently included in USAREUR's personnel authorization USAREUR also funded USAIAREES In the 15 December message CINCUSAREUR requested transfer of the civilian personnel authorization and budgeting funding responsibilities for the Institute U HQDA agreed with USAREUR's request and with OACSI's recommendations it was decided in August 1977 that INSCOM would receive the funding personnel responsibilities for USAIAREES Several reasons were cited why INSCOM control of USAIAREES was better than the existing control of the school as an FOA of OACSI First there was a potentially significant direct relationship between the operational mission of INSCOM and that of USAIAREES Linguistic regional expertise was essential for many INSCOM personnel USAIAREES was an excellent facility to support INSCON's unique training requirement Secondly OACSI as a policy maker and monitor was not the proper agency for exercising the managerial administrative functions being perfonned for the rr __ ' o lfi jft_ J4 bUlilWGBPUi WJW 4WWWi WWWfi 066h fSECRET Institute From an organizational standpoint the administration management and funding of USAIAREES could be more effectively accomplished under the contra 1 of INS COM The transfer of USAIAREES to INSCOM was scheduled for 1 October 1978 28 INSCOM Su ort to Joint Readiness Exercises U In every Joint Readiness Exercise JRX o certa n e ements o e eadiness Command REDCOM staff required augmentation Depending upon the size of the exercise the joint task force JTF commander increased his staff with between 15 and 60 personnel The exercise director who administratively controlled the event generally augmented his activity with 50 or more personnel With respect to all augmentees including intelligence specialists REDCOM nomally depended upon its components Air Force Readiness AFRED Tactical Air Command and Amy Readiness ARRED FORSCOM to provide the personnel However both components and in particular FORSCOM 1 did not have the ability to field the numbers or grades of personnel required This was especially true in the case of Counterintelligence prisoner of war interrogation IPW and operations security OPSEC specialists It appeared that REDCOM and FORSCOM desired INSCOM support in obtaining intelligence augmentees but were unsure of what INSCOM could or wanted to provide and INSCOM gave no fi m commitment along these lines since its fonnation under IOSS The mechanics of coordinating such support were politically sensitive since FORSCOM jealously guarded its role as exclusive Anny intermediary with REDCOM In addition REDCOM might not readily acknowledge any shortcomings At the close of FY 1978 INSCOM had made no fi nn decision to convnit specific INSCOM support to REDCOM or to c indicate that this conmand could not provide assistance 29 U REFORGER 78 In September 1978 the 66th MI Group supported REFORGER 78 The Group had staff supervision over aviation assets of the 2d MI Battalion AE P and the 502d Intelligence and Security Battalion EW P It was the best REFORGER perfonnance by the 330th ASA Company since they were fielded to Europe This was also the most difficult REFORGER exercise for the unit to support in that for the first time they supported both Blue and Orange Forces throughout the exercise Unit pre-exercise planning was extensive and included the development of teams working areas and split integrated processing facility operations for both the Orange and Blue Forces The success of Orange Blue operations demonstrated the feasibility for the GUARDRAIL system to be tasked simultaneously against real-world targets while dedicating several positions to support division brigade exercises ARTEP's High quality tasking by the corps throughout the exercise was also outstanding Finally the Tactical Comnanders Tenninal TCT concept again proved itself to be a fast and reliable means for delivering intelligence to tactical commanders The 2d MI Battalion participated in its first REFORGER exercise and all of its elements provided outstanding support SLAR side-looking airborne radar missions dominated the contributi ns of the 73d MI Company AS 2d MI Battalion during the exercise High quality reports on moving targets were reported in a timely manner throughout the exercise Taskin9 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON i 1-' PtU L c I BY USAINSCOM FOUPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD S200 IR r Q 6 F'i t 59 rsrcRE f f 1-l DLE VIA COMINT CHANNELS Olsll't _ Ji ti Jiili SECREl of the unit's photo and infra-red IR capability was strictly for OPSEC purposes in the division rear areas The QUICKLOOK I system also perfonned well during the exercise although there were a few instances of airframe problems which delayed missions 30 Reserve Component MI Program Reconrnendat1ons U In response to the query from the Vice Chief of Staff US Anny- What is the status of the MI Reserve and what is needed to improve that status -BG Rolya CG INSCOM presented a briefing to the CSA in early December 1977 He made evaluations and recommendations concurred in by both FORSCOM and INSCOM Three of the recommended items were 1 That there must be a strong centralized intensive management element at HQ FORSCOM to resolve MI Reserve Component personnel training and logistics problemsi 2 that a greater number of smaller units should be fanned to encompass a wider geographical area so that virtually all population resources could be tappedi and 3 that non-SI simulated SIGINT be developed in order to provide realistic simulated SIGINT product and technique without the extreme security restriction of real SIGINT 31 11 Equipment for ASA Reserve Units U In October 1975 the Reserve Affairs Officer HQ USAsA initiated a management program to inventory redistribute and acquire excess equipment within 000 to improve the readiness of ASA Reserve Units for which ASA with FORSCOM shared varying responsibility In March 1978 CDR FORSCOM approved the INSCOM-developed plan for redistribution of the equipment obtained from the Defense Property Disposal Service and being stored and refurbished at the Tobyhanna Anny Depot The actual redistribution of the equipment occurred during March and April resulting in the doubling of mission equipment configurations with the Army Security Reserve Units 32 Status of Individual Ready Reserve U Although many programs have been tried nothing to date has made any pennanent affect on the problem of recruiting retention and the dramatic decline in strength of the Individual Ready Reserve IRR The IRR was almost totally fed by the draft and since its end no significant substitute has been presented In 1973 the IRR consisted of some 1 3 million bodies and in 1977 was reported to have about 200-300 thousand personnel The rate of decline at last report was some 10 000 per month INSCOM had direct responsibility for about 325 Mobilization Designee MOBDES spaces which had about 70 percent fill at the close of FY 1978 INS COM depended primarily upon referrals from OACSI US Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center RCPAC and other commands individuals to fill the spaces In addition INSCOM attempted to screen personnel leaving the Active Army for possible reassignment to the Reserve Components 33 Transfer of Statutory Tour Position U Effective 30 June 1976 one of the t -10 Statutory Tour Reserve Officers under contract pos i ti ans at HQ USASA was eliminated and on l July 1976 one position was established at USAINTA In essence the position was transferred from ASA to USAINTA REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON - ri 2 L -I BY USAINSCOM FOl PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR 068 60 SECRET HANDlE VIA COMINT 0-V NNELS ONI Y Ali fiPW NM However once INSCOM was established on l January 1977 there was again two spaces under one command It was decided that the space then unfilled should be filled and once the 1ncumbent's contract expired in the nowfilled slot the position should be transferred to FORSCOM The rationale was that the incumbent was already doing FORSCOM duties in supporting ASA Reserve units and that the transfer would continue to serve INSCOM s interest and that it would be ful fi 11 i ng INSCOM s service cl aim to support FORSCOM efforts The incumbent LTC Ray Chamberlain was transferred to FORSCOM on 14 August 1978 34 1 1 Transfer of Investigative Functions to DIS U In November 1977 the Office of the Secretary of Defense OSD proposed investigative policy guidelines that would transfer to the Defense Investigative Service DIS responsibility for conducting in CONUS and controlling OCONUS all 11 postadjudication11 investigations concerning suitability hostage and loyalty matters but retaining service responsibility for investigation of espionage sabotage and subversion cases where foreign involvement or influence was clearly indicated OSD viewed this change as consistent with the definition of Counterintelligence contained in Executive Order 12036 which stated that counterintelligence did not include personnel security After departmental conments were submitted and reviewed OSD confinned the guidelines in March 1978 with an effective date of 16 July 1978 for the transfer of the post clearance investigation for cause function to DIS As a result the INSCOM Investigations Office under the Central Security Facility was disestablished U To implement the policy changes on 18 September 1978 INSCOM submitted a proposed revision of AR 381-20 to ACS DA for consideration and prepared implementing procedural instructions for MI Groups outside the continental United States to follow in conducting investigations under DIS control Under DA implementing instructions issued on 13 July 1978 the MI Groups became sub-control offices for DIS in conducting the investigations As a follow-on ACSI DA and INSCOM developed similar procedures for conducting Limited Access Authority LAA investigations of foreign nationals overseas 35 Arrival of Uncleared Personnel U The number of INSCOM military personnel arriving at a new station without the required security clearance increased during FY 1978 despite MILPERCEN assignment policies which required that the soldier be adjudicated for the required security clearance prior to departure from the old duty station In a study covering tte 1 January-31 July 1978 timeframe it was found that on a command-wide basis 578 of all the persons who should have been eligible for Sensitive Compartmented Infonnation SCI i e SI and SAO infonnation upon their arrival reached their new assignments without the gaining unit having sufficient information to immedtately indoctrinate those persons and put them to work Delays in obtaining the authority to indoctrinate these 578 persons resulted in 140 895 lost man hours to INSCOM $654 491 additional pennanent change of station PCS costs to the Army of $9 850 for a total loss of $669 976 61 069 ' I ' ' o o ' t o o - o o r I I J i - - _ 'I o o ' ' 4 U In an effort to alleviate the situation MILPERCEN adopted a policy of pre-screening nominees and issued assignment instructions only on those soldiers meeting the selection criteria In addition INSCOM trailer carded all requisitions for DA MOS which required an SI clearance to specifically address the screening requirement procedures for initiating the Special Background Investigation SBI paperwork and reiterating the fact that the soldier would not depart the old duty station until the appropriate security clearance was granted HQDA through the ACSI staff MILPERCEN and the DA IG would monitor to assure compliance by losing commands with MILPERCEN instructions To aid in the identification of repeated offenders INSCOM subordinate units were required to provide notification to HQ INSCOM of every arrival of persons not eligible for SI If warranted a file with continuous offenses by a unit would be forwarded to the DA staff for appropriate action U Prior to the integration of INSCOM adjudicators into the Central Security Clearance Facility at Fort Meade the time required for a completed background investigation and adjudication averaged four months for members of INSCOM Delays in adjudication or administration were negligible How ever with the fonnation of the US Anny Central Personnel Security Clearance F acility CCF there surfaced numerous problem areas resulting in lengthy delays in responses and granting authority to indoctrinate The delays were the direct result of the innumerable problems inherent in the fonnation of a new organization-one of which was having less than 50 percent of authorized strength INSCOM undertook to alleviate some of the delays by taking several actions through its Command Security Office OCSCI 1 It interceded on behalf of INSCOM commanders by submitting 34 Compelling Need Requests to the CCF 2 it contacted by letter each officer receiving orders to an INSCOM assignment explaining the security requirements and 3 it provided canned instructions and requirements for SI access to MILPERCEN to be included in both officer and enlisted orders 36 Military Justice U The number of non-judicial punishments imposed under Article 15 continued to decrease from previous years In FY 1977 they totaled 252 dropping to 232 in FY 1978 There were 4 Special CourtsMartial in FY 197T 2 Summary 7 Special and 1 General Courts-Martial in FY 1977 and l Summary 4 Special and l General in FY 1978 1 U The table below gives a breakdown of serious crime by category for FY s 197T 1977 and 1978 Overall there was little changed during FY 1978 from the previous year in the area of Crimes of Violence and Drug Offenses however Crimes Against Property increased from 4 to 23 37 62 070 u #WI b L G@ I AWi i' -roa-oo FliliozotoFllf - ------ mw caa lillt Table 15 -Serious Crime Offenses Crimes of Violence D' lI FY 77 FY 78 Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Assault Assault Battery 2 1 0 0 0 0 l 9 l 0 0 0 6 5 2 1 0 0 Crimes Against Proeertt Larceny Burglary Breaking Entering Auto Theft Malicious Damage Destruction of Property 0 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 6 0 0 l 27 0 2 0 l 0 21 3 l 0 1 0 23 2 0 Drug Offenses Use Posession Narcotics Dangerous Drugs Marihuana Sale Trafficking All Categories U Personnel were administratively discharged for the reasons shown in the table below during FY 1978 38 Table 16 -FY 1978 Administrative Eliminations Authoritt Hon Gen Less Than Hon Chap 5 AR 645-200 11 0 0 Chap 10 AR 635-200 0 0 2 Chap 13 AR 635-200 1 Unsuitability 10 3 0 2 Unfitness 0 1 0 Chap 14 AR 635-200 0 0 0 Chap 15 AR 635-200 0 0 0 Chap 16 AR 635-200 0 0 0 AR 635-206 0 0 0 U Beginning with the 2d Qtr FY 1977 units were required to indicate in their military justice reports the number and method of disposition of 63 0 ' 071 certain offenses below The information provided is summarized in the table Table 17 -Disposition of Other Offenses FY 1978 Method Offense Art Art Art Art Art Art Art No Absences Without Leave 41 89 Disrespect 4 90 Disobeying Order of Corrmissioned Officer 8 91 Disobeying Order of Warrant Officer or NCO 17 92 Violating Failure to Obey Orderi Dereliction of Duty 59 95 Resisting Arrest 1 111 112 Drunk Driving i Drunk on Duty 15 86 PolM'raph Examinations U During FY 1978 polygraph examiners assigned to litary Intelligence units in CONUS Republic of Korea and Western Europe conducted 226 polygraph examinations in support of US Am Y counterintelligence investigations offensive and defensive CI operations HUMINT activities and the Am Y LimitedAccessAuthority LAA Program Worldwide activities involved conduct of examinations in Japan and Central and South American in addition to those in geographical areas to which MI examiners were assigned Of the total examinations conducted 74 were adjudged deception indicated DI by the examiners During the interview portions of DI examinations 52 examinees provided significant admissions for a 70 percent admission rate worldwide The table below reflects the polygraph activities for FY 1978 Table 18 -Polygraph Activities FY 1978 Total Activity Technical Review of Polygraph Exami nati ans Review of Permanent Polygraph Files New Files Created DIS FDIC Privacy Center Other Authorized Requesters TOTAL Examiner Certification Actions Polygraph Examinations Conducted ODCSCI 902d MI Gp 66th MI Gp 501 st MI Gp TOTAL Seminars Examiner Refresher Training 226 666 142 39 2 488 3 335 28 85 88 53 226 1 3 64 072 - U The number of examinations conducted by the 209th MI Detachment 501st MI Group declined by more than a third in FY 1978 The reason for the decline began in FY 1977 when some of the Koreans employed by US Forces objected to the annual polygraph examination required in conjunction with 'LAA investigations Although all examinations were voluntary technically andtheexaminee was required to attest willingness in writing certain employees objected on the grounds that a polygraph examination was not a basis for reliable conclusions was an affront to the honest worker and had resulted in injustices In May 1978 anti-polygraph articles began to appear in the Korean press and the unfavorable press attention generated a reevaluation of the Anny's Limited Access Authority program On 29 September 1978 MG Robert C Kingston Chief of Staff US Forces Korea issued the directive that polygraph examinations might be used in the employment selection process in cases wherein LAA was necessary as a pre-condition of employment Thereafter however polygraph examinations would be conducted only in instances wherein derogatory infonnation or lack of information could not be resolved through other investigative means and that employees refusing to undergo polygraph examination when requested would be denied access to classified information This new policy would undoubtedly result in a further decrease in the number of examinations conducted in Korea and would probably cause reduction of examiner strength from two authorized to one certified examiner 39 Congressional Inquiries Requests for Assistance U Responses to Congressional Inquiries during FY 1978 totaled 68 and represented virtually no change from the 66 accomplished in FY 1977 Nevertheless certain statistically significant trends were noted Inquiries in four categories Unit Conditions Security Matters Transfer Reassignment and Transportation Travel continued to account for approximately one-half the total actions processed-29 of 66 in FY 1977 and 33 of 68 in FY 1978 While relatively minor fluctuations were noted within these and almost all other categories a notable exception occurred in the category of Assignment Utilization wherein the number of inquiries decreased from nine in FY 1977 to only one in FY 1978 and clearly reflected a decrease in the personnel turbulence created by INSCOM's inception - U Responses to IG Actions Requests IGAR received by HQ INSCOM during FY 1978 including those evolving from complaint periods conducted as an integral part of all General Inspections totaled 149 and represented a 37 percent decrease from FY 1977 The extent of this decrease was illusory however inasmuch as the total of IGAR's processed INSCOM-wide decreased by only 8 percent 441 to 404 Rather it represented a significant shift in IGAR workload to Acting Inspectors General AIG appointed for that specific purpose at principal INSCOM subordinate units-from 46 percent of IGAR actions in FY 1977 to 63 percent in FY 1978 It was also important and encouraging to note that AIG workload was composed of IGAR's received directly from and responses provided directly to requesting personnel rather than upon referrals from this headquarters Ideally the most effective and responsive GAR system was that operated at the lowest possible 65 00 073 - CONADENTIAl echelon ment This was clearly occurring and was a significant systemic improve- U Those GAR' s received by detailed HQ INSCOM Inspectors General were rather evenly distributed among 26 established categories with no single category accounting for more than 10 percent of the total Major decreases more than 50 percent were noted in the categories of Assignment Utilization Mistreatment Civilian Employee Matters Security Matters Transfer Reassignment and Transportation Travel With the exception of Civilian Employee and Security Matters decreases in other categories were probably attributable to greater problem solving efforts by subordinate commanders coupled with greater confidence in the INSCOM AIG system The decrease in Civilian Employee Matters likely steim ed from a lessening of anxiety concerning HQ INSCOM relocation To some degree the decrease in Security Matters probably reflected the transfer of clearance granting denial authority from INSCOM to US Anny Centeral Personnel Security Clearance Facility MI LPERCEN 40 lT Status of Aircraft Resources C The only change within INSCOM's aviation resources during the year was the addition of a C-12 aircraft to USA Field Station Sinop The plane was originally planned for USA Field Station Udorn but with the station's closure the aircraft was diverted to Sinop It was a pressurized all-weather aircraft which pennitted passengers to fly comfortably up to 25 000 feet and represented the Anny's newest models Aircraft resources as of 30 September 1978 are shown in table below 41 Table 19 -Aircraft Resources 30 Sep 78 Unit 146th ASA Co Avn USAFS Korea 704th Ml Det USAFS Si nop USAFS Augsburg 66th MI Group Type of Aircraft RU-21H U-21A UH-lH OV-1 D U-21A C-12 UH-lH UH-lH 30 Sep 78 6 1 3 6 2 1 2 l -22 TOTAL Inadvertently omitted in aircraft type in FY 1977 Annual Historical Review U 66 CONFIDENTIAL r r 074 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON c -flliC I f BY USAINSCO f FO PA Auth Para 4-10 LiuD 5200 IR CONFIDENTIAL II SIGINT EW tactical support units was drafted ACS DA coordinated the draft among the c01T1T1anders of USAREUR TRAOOC FORSCOM and INSCOM on 6 January 1977 In its response INSCOH indicated that the MOU was not necessary but rather appropriate changes to existing directives would suffice In October 1977 ACS DA coordinated a final draft among the major commands this draft had met the approval of DIRNSA CHCSS INSCOM found it acceptable with the exception of two major points 1 It did not mention INSCOM as both the Service Cryptologic Agency SCA and the Anny's executive agent for peacetime utilization of the AnitY's SIGINT tactical resources and 2 EUSA was not in receipt of the draft MOU nor was it mentioned in the draft on the basis of the 329th ASA Company assignment to the 2d Infantry Division INSCOM's recommended changes addressing these two points wo not adopted in the final document which was signed on 28 December 1977 U - 1 1 -The purpose of the Memorandum was to codify the agreed upon views of the CSA and DIRNSA as to the control employment and technical interface of US Army tactical SIGINT activities It recognized both US Army and NSACSS responsibilities for US SIGINT operations The tenets of this t U provided corps and division commanders the authority to designate objectives and assign SIGINT missions and directive authority to accomplish the mis- c ' n'ls U '7 NSACSS retained SIGINT operational control over all US SIGINT units through the US Signals Intelligence Directive USSID system USSID's prescribed the authoritative uniform techniques and standards by which SIGINT information was collected processed and reported and they also prescribed the manner in which requisite management infonnation was reported to NSACSS The CSA also designated the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence as the Army focal point for SIGINT U - o 1s two complementary actions the DIRNSA CHCSS signed a new USSID-1000 which prescribed the SIGINT mission relationships functions and tasks of the Army's Service Cryptologic Agency and HQDA published AR 10-53 Organization and Functions US Army Intelligence and Security Command INSCOM effective 15 June 1978 In the SIGINT arena INSCOM as the Army's SCA would perfonn SIGINT functions and tasks required by the DIRNSA CHCSS command assigned intelligence units and activities provide technical advice and assistance to major Army commands on SIGlNT EW matters be the executive agent of the peacetime utilization program for Army SIGINT matters and assist in coordination between Anny tactical SIGINT resources and NSAcss U 1 -INSCOM was chartered by both HQDA and NSACSS as the technical expert in Army SIGINT management Aney commanders responsible for SIGINT units all of which are components of the US SIGINT system were to rely on INSCOM to assure adherence to the US Signal Intelligence Directive system 42 - Cover and Deception U Annex I of the Anny Capabilities Plan called for major commands to designate a point of contact regarding cover and deception matters However there was little compliance to the plan By message 67 CONFIDENTIAi 00 07J REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON b 1 f z IL k' I BY USAINSr0 1 FOT PA Auth Para J-- lcJ _ 00 lR - dated 6 April 1978 DA specifically requested a point of contact be submitted As a result HQ INSCOM designated the Readiness Office ODCSOPS as responsible for military cover requirements coordinated between HQ INSCOM and the Special Plans Office DCSOPS DA 43 US A Investi ative Records Re ositor IRR U The IRR was estabs e as t es ng e centra repository or nny investigative files in 1962 at Fort Holabird Maryland as a result of the Security Shield Study that led to the creation of the US Anny Intelligence Co1T1T1and The IRR used as an organizational base the US Anny Central Records Facility CRF which was part of the Counterintelligence Corps Center Fort Holabird At that time decentralized files held by the CONUS Annies and overseas conmands were transferred to the IRR U Even though the IRR was purged as late as 1971-74 a number of factors subsequently arose which indicated a re-screening was necessary The Freedom of Infonnation Act Amendments effective in February 1975 and the Privacy Act effective in September 1975 became new considerations It was evident that full compliance could not be insured until procedures were worked out for locating the unauthorized files still in the IRR and for eliminating authorized files that had become outdated Requests received under the two laws began to surface an uncomfortable number of unauthorized files and it was evident that explanations of acceptable error rates would not suffice indefinitely Finally a series of studies conducted by USAINTA from late 1974 through mid-1975 disclosed a significant amount of information to be considered in screening and handling processes more than previously realized For example a study of the various special handling requirements mandated for the IRR disclosed 34 separate items for concern during screening rather than the two that attracted primary interest during the 1971-74 purge U When it was detennined that a new screening program would be necessary a detailed and well thought out plan for purging was developed and resource re quirements identified First a new retention criteria was approved by the National Archivist This was based largely on criteria disseminated by 00D in 1976 The new guidelines established a basic 15-year 25-year Permanent criteria favorable and minor derogatory files would be retained 15 years significant incidents and investigations resulting in unfavorable personnel actions would be retained 25 years serious espionage and sabotage files would be retained pennanently The new criteria also required that certain types of files be offered to the National Archives after a period of time 25 years for most when no longer authorized for Anny retention AR 380-13 type material In addition the Army addressed some types of files not addressed by the 000 instructions The entire set of guidelines identified a total of eight types of files existent in IRR with disposition instructions established for each - U It was concluded in 1975 that it would require approximately 240 manyears to complete a screening of the personality hard copy dossiers If 68 oc 076 - this were to be done in a two-year period it would require 120 people physical space availability precluded this option A more manageable screening team size was decided upon-30 people for approximately eight years Requests for people to accomplish the screening were submitted in 1975 and 1976 and were disapproved by HQDA both times The OACSI could not understand why the added resources were needed to screen the files when the IRR had just completed purges in 1974 and 1975 and the estimated error rate had been deemed acceptable By 1977 hONever the weight of evidence to include the fact that there was more than simply AR 380-13 factors to consider reversed HQDA view and the request for 30 people was accepted and submitted to DOD where it was also approved effective 1 October 1978 It was planned that the 30 spaces authorized for the screening program would be organized into a new division in the IRR the Files Maintenance Review Division with three operating branches U The IRR maintained all counterintelligence and security files created by or for the Department of the Anny that met the criteria specified in AR's 381-45 and 380-13 and provided service to authorized Anny DOD and other authorized agencies of the Executive Branch of the Government by furnishing files or documents reproductions Most troublesome of the requests for the IRR were those concerning litigations against the government and Congressional inquiries which required an intensive search of all records maintained in the repository These actions of i1T111ediate nature often required a virtual shut-down and overtime to complete As an example one request required 776 manhours to complete These type files located by USAIRR personnel were exhaustively reviewed page-by-page by members of the Investigations Element DCSCI exclusively as it was necessary in the interests of speed thoroughness and critical perception that review be conducted by personnel of extensive CI background and experience Approximately 4 500 manhours including time of USAIRR personnel were expended on Congressional inquiry litigation actions during FY 1978 Tasking was fulfilled on 27 litigations and 36 Congressional inquiriesi the litigations figures included 16 requests for infonnation regarding electronic surveillance It was estimated that between 6 500 to 7 500 USAIRR files were reviewed In September 1978 the IRR transferred the function of processing special interest requests emanating from litigation actions motions for discovery electronic surveillance and Congressional requests to the newly created Special Acts Office under the USA Central Security Facility but the Special Acts Office would not become effective until 16 October 1978 U During FY 1978 a total of 187 636 dossiers were reviewed by the personnel of the repository to detennine their retainability under the criteria set forth in AR 380-13 Acquisition and Storage of Infonnation Concerning Non-Affiliated Persons and Organizations Of this amount 152 520 were retained and 35 116 deleted Army Reserve personnel serving for periods of 12 to 26 days each from 5 December 1977 30 September 1978 accounted for the review of 44 995 of these files The personal qualities and capabilities of the reservist personnel were outstanding and contributed immeasurably to the IRR function of insuring that file holdings were legally 69 - re 077 - retainable The IRR also accomplished the review of 32 710 pieces of supplemental investigative material and created 7 099 personality dossiers and 111 impersonal files The joint efforts of all personnel and the increased emphasis on the types of material to be stored in the repository reduced the IRR holdings from 3 728 788 records to 3 649 455 during FY 1978 U Since mid-1977 efforts by OACSI US Army Central Security Facility and DCSCI INSCOM have been unden1ay to sort out investigative material fon1arded to the IRR under the provisions of AR 604-5 and to determine the proper repository for filing of investigative material and adjudicative data subsequent to the Defense Investigative Service DIS investigation The OACSI CI personnel concurred in the conclusion that DIS should file approximately 15 various types of material for which their office currently had a file and remove the favorable Entrance National Agency Check National Agency Check ENTNAC NAC entry in the Defense Central Index of Investigations DCII when subsequent unfavorable infonnation existed The issue was forwarded by OACSI to the Department of Defense for resolution To date no final resolution of the matter was received The issue of filing supplemental data in the IRR and concurrent growth rate was a matter of major importance in the records management area for determining the feasibility of micromation 44 SCI Facility at Fort Meade U Preliminary planning for establishment of a Sensitive Compartmented Intelligence SCI Facility encompassing administrative offices of the INSCOM Deputy C011111anding General for Intelligence at Fort George G Meade began in February 1978 The upgrade of the existing facility by contractor personnel and complete modernization of communications facilities equipment included installation of shielded cable new main distribution frame type 568HA and 680A telephone equipment NSACSS gray telephone capability and AUTOVON Current planning for this area was to provide an OPSCOtft1 capability to the DCG-I which would enable him to communicate directly with the Intelligence Coordination Center ICC at HQ INSCOM Arlington Hall Station and with subordinate elements arQynd the world Occupancy of the upgraded area began in late August 1978 4 5 Base O erations Su tort USA Field Stationj Okinawa U At the direction of DA n August 19 OS Army Japan USAR pursued the objective of transferring responsibility for base operations support on Okinawa to the other services so as to permit the zeroing out of its personnel on the island INSCOM opposed the suggestion by USARJ that USAFS Okinawa as the largest residual Army command on the island assume responsibility for certain functions being performed by US Army Garrison Okinawa In June 1977 the Pacific Review Group an ad hoc group from the DA staff took a second look at the US Army realignment actions in the Pacific and concluded that by the end of FY 1978 the USARJ presence in Okinawa should be reduced to approximately 882 spaces Beyond that date this residual activity should be further examined looking toward transfer of all base operations support BOS facilities and responsibilities to other services The Chief of Staff US Army approved these recommendations on 26 September 1977 In a letter to 70 ' 078 - the Commander US Anny Garrison Okinawa dated 26 September 1977 the USAFS Okinawa Co111T1ander indicated his projected support requirements A month later the Station Commander emphasi zed to LTG Eivind H Johansen the DCSLOG DA visiting the island that INSCOM was unconcerned as to the service supplying support as long as its needs were met U The Joint Services Conference convened on 4 November 1977 and was chaired by BG J D Bruen Director Resources and Management ODCSLOG DA The Conferees comprising representatives of all services and 000 initiated discussion of 19 unresolved function and facility transfer issues The 000 representative stressed the fact that the Office of the Secretary of Defense OSD was completely behind the transfer by DA Agreement in principle was reached on 14 issues leaving five unresolved United Seamen's Service Club BOS for Ports COITIOOn User Land Transportation CULT Okinawa Petroleum Distribution System BOS for Torii Station and Army Peculiar Support By a Joint Coordinated US Anny US Navy US Marine and US Air Force message the remaining five issues were referred to OSD for decision Of the five the two of primary importance to INSCOM were BOS for Torii Station and Anny Peculiar Support U The BOS for Torii Station issue included accountability and maintenance responsibility for all real property on the station communications operational administrative cantonment storage COIIITlunity and recreational facilities as well as the station's recreation program In SUIIITlarizing the issue sheet USARJ identified the following USARJ resources as associated with the function and available for the transfer to gaining service upon acceptance of responsibility for its perfonnance in Table 20 Table 20 -USARJ Resources Available For Transfer Maneower Seaces Engr Recr Svcs - OFF ENL 0 0 0 3 USDH CIV FNIH CIV 3 6 58 15 TOTAL 61 24 85 Eguiement and Funds Facilities TOA - $ 55 300 1 500 CTA 42 000 Supplies OMA - 2 271 000 30 000 MPA Real Estate - 467 Acres 20 342 520 Sq Ft Buildings - Comprising 431 999 Sq Ft U The Army Peculiar Support issue sheet included the following functions Military Police Investigations Serious Incident Reporting SIR Chaplain Military Justice Class B Agent COMPACT Education Assistance Alcohol Drug Abuse and EEO RREO In accord with INSCOM's position DCSLOG DA withdrew 71 079 and retained as USARJ responsibilities three functions Military Justice Class B Agent and COMPACT military personnel administration prior to referring the issue to OSD for resolution The retention of these three functions brought the total manpower reduction from 98 down to only 24 The DCSLOG DA retitled the issue Minor Miscellaneous Support Activities U Pending the OSD ASD MRA L decision on the Minor Miscellaneous Support Activities and BOS Torii Station there arose several actions which weakened the Anny's position First the Air Force by separate Memorandum dated 2 March 1978 stated to OSD its opposition to the DA proposal that the Air Force be directed to accept responsibility for these Anny residual support functions Regarding BOS Torii Station the Air Force remarked that NSACSS tasking was the only reason for the presence of SCA personnel on Okinawa and therefore the issue should be passed to NSA for study and resolution with appropriate service activities the Anny should continue to provide BOS including real estate accountability and property maintenance until the issue was resolved The Air Force alleged that NSA N-2 had concurred in this proposal Concerning the proposed transfer of the remaining miscellaneous support functions 11 the Air Force asserted that retention of installation host responsibility by the Army at Torii Station would provide adequate BOS base to pennit USARJ to continue support to residual Army activities U The second even to weaken the Anny's drive for a complete phase-out was the April 1978 decision by OSD on the petroleum distribution system It was contrary to the Anny recommendation and continued Anny's responsibility for the function U On 19 June 1978 the Assistant Secretary of Defense MRA L issued a decision memorandum directing that the Services jointly review the BOS Torii Station and submit a combined reconinendation OSD stated that any reconinendation should meet the objective of eliminating Anny responsibility personnel and other resources for BOS to the extent possible In regard to Minor Miscellaneous Support Functions the ASD MRA L directed that the Army make arrangements with other Services to obtain such services based on the location of the residual Army personnel requiring them U To obtain Air Force concurrence on a resolution of Minor Miscellaneous Services DCSLOG DA found it necessary to modify INSCOM's desire that gaining organization should insure that resources received from USAG Okinawa are used to provide the same service in the same location 11 The modification read- transferred functions will be provided at the installation of the gaining service As this limiting condition was unacceptable with respect to Chaplain and Educational Assistance DA transferred those functions from the Minor Miscellaneous issue package to BOS Torii Station Because of the manhours lost in travel time by Torii personnel to obtain finance and personnel COMPACT support from USAG Okinawa activities located 18 miles away the Coninander USAFS Okinawa proposed that residual USAG Okinawa personnel activities finance SJA Chaplain COMPACT 72 - 080 be moved to Tor1i Station and that he be pennitted to assume responsibility for these functions for all remaining Arn y personnel In a reply dated 9 August MG Rolya CG INSCOM reiterated his position opposing assumption of BOS responsibilities by INSCOM on Okinawa unless directed by DA He did agree to promote relocation of USAG Okinawa personnel service elements to Torii Station subject to availability of suitable facilities On 8 September 1978 the Chief of Staff INSCOM provided the CDR USAFS Okinawa with additional guidance in exploring the possibility of relocating USAG Okinawa support U In the area of BOS Torii Station the issue was addressed at the Pentagon level because of the inability to resolve the problem at lower levels DA did coordinate its positions with INSCOM Both DCSLOG DA and INSCOM were pessimistic concerning the likelihood of achieving the type of agreement on BOS Torii directed by OSD It should be noted that USAFS Okinawa had little to gain by transfer of the installation to Air Force responsibility On 5 December 1977 CDR Torii Station had reported that the CDR 18th Tactical Fighter Wing prospective AF host had stated as his condition of acceptance that Torii Station would be established as a sub-post of Kadena with an AF conunander This subordination would work to the detriment of INSCOM' s long tenn objectives by weakening its control over essential support facilities U On l September 1978 DCSLOG DA representative met with the N2 L3 at NSACSS The latter expressed the fact that NSACSS was concerned with only the costs and capability of the gaining service to provide support and was not otherwise involved with resolving the BOS Torii issue As the impact of any NSA study which might affect the action would be some years down the road '' it should not be a basis to defer decision concerning transfer This contradicted an AF statement that N-2 concurred in the AF reconwnendat1on that transfer of responsibility for BOS Torii should be deferred the Anny remaining responsible until the issue was resolved by NSA U In the final week of FY 1978 DA concluded its longstanding dispute with the other services over base operations responsibilities on Okinawa by agreeing with the Air Force that the WESTPAC III objectives in the Pacific had been effectively achieved and action to transfer further functions facilities should be discontinued At the close of the year the Air Force had a ratio of 47 percent operations and 53 percent support on Okinawa the Ant Y'S was 73 percent and 27 percent respectively This represented a vast improvement from the beginning of the transfer effort when Anny had 21 percent of the military population and provided 95 percent of the base operations support - U A 28 September 1978 message to CDR USAFS Okinawa noted that this would mean that USAGt Okinawa redesignated USA Support Activity Okinawa effective 1 October 1978J would continue to support Torii Station in most of the important areas However the Chaplain Educational Advisor and Equal Opportunity Race Relations functions could not be integrated with the BOS Torii 73 ' 081 'BRET function Action to transfer these functions to other services should be completed by l January 1979 46 Rehling Nuclear Power Plant sj b 1 lrhe Lech Power Company planned FY's 1979-85 construction of a nuclear power plant 3 5 km from the INSCOM Gablingen facility in Gennany An electromagnetic interference EMI test at a similar site extrapolated indicated that interference to Gabl1ngen reception would result Through USAREUR the Bavarian Government was advised of US objections to the proposed constructian As of December 1977 Augsburg city and county as well as bl 1l had all objected to the proposed construction Indications at that time were that Gennan authorities would disapprove the project without further ointervention of US Forces suming the project to be a dead issue at USAREUR' s recommendation b 1 deferred a contract to identify and cost-out remedial measures s e construction be approved S-CCO b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 S-CCO I - b 1 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 S-CCO I I b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 L I C-CCO L I_ b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 er os2 74 gECREl HANDLE VlA COMINl CHANNELS ONLY - - b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 U tC-CCO In August 1978 the USCOB approved the project and Bonn funded it for 3d Qtr FY 1980 The funding limit was 16 275 million OM The plans for the facility were presently being drawn up by the Gennan Construction Agency The plans were scheduled for completion in May 1979 48 Declassification of cr ptolo ic Records U On 10-11 April 1978 NSACSS hosted a workshop on class f1cat1on at Fort Meade The workshop was the first in a series of meetings and-discussions concerning the coordination of a cryptologic record declassification effort sterrming from intense White House pressure to release more historical SIGINT documents to the public The purpose of the first workshop was to reach a corrmon approach to dec-1 assi fi cation guidelines and procedures The upshot of the meeting was the circulation among the three Service Cryptologic Agencies SCA's of a Memorandum of Understanding O U initiated by Admiral Inman DIRNSA and ultimately signed by the SCA commanders The MOU accomplished the following 1 U Established that NSA would provide the SCA's with declassification guidelines and a list of key words and phrases to be used in identifying cryptologic records 2 U Established that NSA and the three SCA's would fully exchange infonnation on their declassification work to prevent duplication and establish a division of declassification effort by broad categories of subject matter 3 U Constituted a decision-making declassification panel made up of members of the SCA's and NSA 4 U Required the SCA's to examine immediate ways to participate in the NSACSS declassification program 5 U Provided that there be an exchange of available listings of pennanent cryptologic holdings as soon as possible U Mr Edward Hersh Chief Records Management Branch OOCSPER HQ INSCOM briefed MG Rolya on the workshop and the implications of the MOU In his briefing Mr Hersh emphasized the following 1 U Any program designed to identify cryptologic records by key words and phrases that NSA provided would have to take into consideration the fact that the A 'IY followed AR 340-18-5 in identifying its cryptologic holdings This was a numbered system and not a key word system 2 U A records management representative should accompany the INSCOM declassification representative to the panel 75 JlJNRlJGBPNfw 083 1 HANDLE VIA COMINf - 3 U Since there were no detailed listings of pennanent cryptologic documents available development of listings and conduct of actual declass1f1cat1on of records would require assets not currently available At a minimum five additional personnel spaces would be required inmediately in the INSCOM Cryptologic Records Center to begin the declassification effort U Based on this briefing MG Rolya instructed the staff to find five spaces to s upport the declasstfication effort Subsequently five pennanent overhire spaces were authorized nd five recognized space requirements were reflected on the TOA for the Adninistrative Audiovisual Support Activity Provisional Reconnended job descriptions for the declassifiers were submitted to Civilian Personnel in August 1978 however at the end of the fiscal year no hiring action had begun 49 INSCOM Historical Collection U During a 31 March 1978 meeting with the Conmand Historian MG William I Rolya 1 CG INSCOM indicated that there was a need to place greater emphasis on the collection and preservation effort and directed establishment of a historical collection to preserve historically significant items pertaining to Anny intelligence Prior to this the History Office had sought to preserve those few memorabilia and historical properties entrusted to its care but had not actively searched out additional items As a result of the 31 March meeting the History Office prepared a long range plan to accomplish the collection Some of the actions undertaken included l Acquiring a storage area 2 sending a conmandwide letter infonning personnel and organizations of the historical collection 3 making agreement with DCSLOG HQ INSCOM to identify turned-in items of historical significance and 4 detennining sources for photographs with historical significance SO Badge Changeover U During the period 31 July-11 August 1978 the Security Identification Credentials security identification card and badge for HQ INSCOM Arlington Hall Station were changed The changeover came as a result of the three-year requirement for a new issuance The previous system was implemented at Arlington Hall Station in September 1975 There was no change to the basic fonnat of the new badges with the exception that a number from l to 4 was placed in the upper right-hand corner and the background color represented access to various compartmented subjects Conversion to the Competitive Service U By letter dated 28 September 1977 the Civil Service Commission CSC approved the conversion of 594 miscellaneous intelligence support-type positions to the Competitive Service It was stipulated that individual r connendations for the conversion of eligible employees to career or career-conditional employment had to be submitted within six months of 28 September 1977 All employees except those in the GS-132 series Intelligence Research Specialist were considered eligible for conversion The GS-132 series positions remained in the - Excepted Service under ncareer direction y 76 b 3 Per DIA 084 U Individual reconmendations for conversion of eligible employees to career or career-conditional employment were submitted to the CSC During the period 1 October through 31 December 1977 575 employees were converted to the Competitive Service with only minor problems encountered 51 Follow-up Survey of INSCOM CIVPER Management bS DCSPER DA U A followup survey to the 1976 DA survey was conducted ya DCS ER DA team during 31 July-ll August 1978 The survey included the Operating Civilian Personnel Officers at Arlington Hall Station AHS Vint Hill Fanns Station VHFS the HQ INSCOM Civilian Personnel staff and management officials at AHS VHFS and HQ INSCOM The purpose of the survey was to detennine the current status and degree of progress that had been made in CIVPER management since 1976 The survey team also focused on the CIVPER ramifications of organizational and systemic changes since the last survey e g the IOSS study the establishment of INSCOM the split-mode headquarters and the conversion of approximately 1 200 fonner ASA civilians to the Competitive Civil Service System U Compared to the 156 deficiencies cited in the 1976 survey the 1978 survey listed only 42 findings as shown below 52 Table 21 -1978 CIVPER Survey Findings Major Responsibility AHS CPO VHFS CPO Staff CIVPER INSCOM Supv Mgrs EEO Office TOTAL Reconmendati ons Programmatic Regulatory Violations 5 11 11 4 0 0 0 9 2 - - 16 26 Civilian High Grade Control U In a letter dated 18 July 1978 DA placed constraints on INSCOM for the number of Senior Level positions that INSCOM could have filled at the end of FY 1979 The Anny computed ceilings for each of its commands It was not a unifonn fonnula because some commands such as INSCOM had been doing their job in meeting the previously established ceilinQSi consequently INSCOM's reduction was near the 2 per cent per year mark in contrast to some corrmands which were required to take up to an 8 percent cut in Senior Level positions the first year U The new DA ceilings allocated to INSCOM were 138 GA-13's and 59 GS-14 l5's for a total of 197 filled Senior Level positions by the end of FY 1979 INSCOM was also advised that there would be an additional 2 percent cut each year through FY 1981 On 30 June 1978 INSCOM had 202 Senior Level filled positions At first glance it appeared that INSCOM must reduce only 5Senior Level positions in the next 13 months However INSCOM' s TDA showed a total 77 r 085 - authorization of 235 Senior Level positions Some of these positions were the result of newly added mission and functions which may be detennined to be more critical than some of the currently filled Senior Level positions U A ceiling on GS-13 and GS-14 15 filled positions was established and transmitted to all organizational elements on 6 September 1978 with the request that an impact statement be provided HQ INSCOM by 1 November The establishment of these ceilings had an adverse effect on morale throughout the comnand as many civilians saw few opportunities for progression to the Senior Level positions Consequently INSCOM lost experienced personnel to other agencies or private enterprise which could offer advancement 53 Adoption of Flexitime U Flexitime was a term used by the US Government for the concept of providing maximum possible latitude in the times civilian employees could work the prescribed 8-hour days The CG INSCOM approved Flexitime beginning 26 June 1978 Because of the duty station the principles of Flexitime which were applicable to civilians were also applied to military personnel The degree of flexibility was detennined at the lowest practical supervisory level Basically there were two types of Flexitime which could be adopted Flexitour and Gliding Time Flexitour consisted of pre-arranged arrival and departure at specific times within the Flexible Bands 0600-0900 and 1500-1800 hrs as mutually agreeable to employee and supervisor A 15-minute leeway before and after arrival time could be allowed under Flexitour as long as 8 hours were worked Gliding Time offered maximum flexibility This allowed a person to arrive and depart at any time within the Flexible Bands on a person's own initiative taking a minimum 1 2 hour and a maximum of 2 hours for lunch as long as 8 hours of duty were perfonned 54 Labor Relations U Although INSCOM continued to be exempt from the Federal Labor Relations Program Unionization with no challenges to this exemption from labor unions the General Intelligence Production Division GIPD a unit of the Intelligence Threat Analysis Center located at Fort Bragg North Carolina continued to be included in a unit of recognition encompassing all of Fort Bragg The Fort Bragg Civilian Personnel Office attempted to take GIPO out of the unit during negotiations for a labor-management agreement in the first quarter but were unsuccessful since a union officer was employed in GIPO U Although the GIPD function was considered to be an intelligence function eligible for exemption by regulation as the Continental Intelligence Center CONTIC under the Continental Anny ColTITland it was detennined that since it did not report directly to ACSI it would be included in the Federal Labor Relations Program An unfair labor practice charge was filed against the conmander over the distribution of parking spaces but was resolved without submission to the US Department of Labor It was anticipated that action would be taken in FY 1979 to have the GIPD excluded from the Federal Labor Relations Program 55 78 Ol 086 - CONFIDENTIAL INSCOM Intern Program U On 14 June 1978 the Chief of Staff HQ INSCOM gave tentative approval for 4 percent overhire representing approximately 65 persons Within this group of overhire recognized but not authorized spaces 25 spaces were allotted for a Conmand intern program The purpose of the intern program was to select highly talented and highly motivated persons from both internal and external sources These persons would be developed by a systematic rotation and intensive training program in order to provide INSCOM with a broader base in the future from which to select senior action officers first 1eve1 supervisors and managers There would be no guarantee beyond the target job and even in respect to the latter the only guarantee would be that the selected must advance at a reasonable rate to the GS-9 journeyman target job or be removed from the program Finally there was no guarantee as to where within the corrmand placement would be made at the completion of the training It was not anticipated that the actual advertising of positions and hiring would take place prior to mid-FY 1979 56 Executive Order 12036 U On 24 January 1978 the President signed Executive Order EO 12036 United States Intelligence Activities which supersedes Executive Order 11905 18 February 1976 United States Foreign lntelHgence Activities EO 12036 provided that where intelligence activities under E O 12036 were to be conducted pursuant to procedures approved or agreed to by the Attorney General those activities may be conducted under tenns and conditions of EO 11905 and any procedures promulgated thereunder until such Attorney General procedures were established Essentially EO 12036 was a rewrite of EO 11905 but it was more clearly written in many ways The main difference between the two involved a much greater role for the Director of Central Intelligence and for the Attorney General U --tet-Copies of the new Executive Order were transmitted to all INSCOM staff elements field stations MI Groups and separate detachments for inclusion in their policy books DCSCI personnel spot-checked various INSCOM elements to insure their compliance with regulatory authorities The major impact the EO 12036 had on INSCOM was that tmplementation by DA on other sorely needed documents had to be held 1n abeyance pending DOD EO 12036 implementation The most important of these documents were revisions of AR 380-13 Acquisitia and Storage of Infonnation Concerning Non-Affiliated Persons and Organizations and AR 381-20 Counterintelligence Activities 57 Freedom of Infonnation Privac Office FOI PO U In FY 1978 the FOi PO rece ve an processe a tota of 2 6 requests This total figure represented an increase of 17 percent over the previous reporting period While Privacy Act PA requests increased frC111 1 653 to 1 718 from the previous year the most dramatic increase was once again in the Freedom of Infonnati on Act FOIA requests from 614 to 937 for a 52 percent increase The table below shows a breakdown of both types of requests by month 79 CONFIDENTIAi 087 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON iw1 '-I L tJ C BY USAINSCOM FOY PA Auth Para H0 2 DOD 5200 IR Table 22 -FOIA and PA Requests During FY 1978 Month FOi PA Total Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 92 92 58 70 62 102 89 138 129 146 160 161 185 129 167 149 93 143 118 230 221 204 230 223 287 218 249 221 171 215 186 l 1 718 2 655 77 77 77 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 TOTALS 82 72 78 72 68 -937 U The following table shows the costs for implementing the Freedom of Infonnation Act and Privacy Act for INSCOM during the first three years of the Acts' existence Table 23 -FOIA and PA Costs FY 1975-1977 FOIA PA $116 793 106 722 157 1 l 81 $0 193 253 369 535 $116 793 299 975 526 716 TOTAL $380 696 $562 788 $943 484 Year FY 1975 FY 1976 FY 1977 Total U A breakdown for the FY 1977 costs of the FOIA and PA are shown in the table below Table 24 -FOIA and PA Costs FY 1977 Item Direct Personnel Costs Overhead Copy Reproduction TOTAL FOIA PA $119 060 30 054 8 067 $274 185 68 124 27 226 $393 245 98 178 351293 $1571181 $369 535 $526 716 80 nr oss Total - U The manhours required per calendar year to administer the FOIA and PA are shown in the table below Table 25 -Manhours Required for FOIA and PA CY's 1975-1977 Professional CY 1975 CY 1976 CY 1977 13 310 22 217 17 662 Clerical 7 486 14 812 8 698 U It was expected that Privacy Act requests would continue to increase moderately for the coming year On 1 October 1977 the US Anny Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility CCF was organized with the mission to process all Anny-wide clearances As with any new organization there was an initial slowdown of work processed until the full personnel authorization was assigned Since a major portion of the Privacy Act requests was the result of adverse adjudications for clearance a steady increase was anticipated with the CCF becoming fully operational U The increase of Freedom of Infonnation Act requests was a reflection of the concentrated effort extended by the FOI staff of the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI to drastically reduce their backlog By augmenting their staff the number of Army documents referred to this office increased proportionately In addition several national level interest FOI requests being processed by the FBI contained a large number of Army documents and these referrals were given increased emphasis by the FBI Freedom of Information requests from researchers continued at a moderate increase and became more specific U The FOI PO HQ INSCOM remained one of the few agencies in the Executive Branch to have processed all requests within the time restraints imposed by the law This record was a result of a workforce with high morale exhibiting true professionalism in work performance 58 Erual Employment O portunitt Office U In November 1977 the CG INSCOM d rected that thequal Emp oyment Opportunity Office be established under the staff cognizance of the DCSPER a full time staff be named He further directed that the military counterpart t he Human Relations Equal Opportunity HR EO Program be placed in the same office At the close of FY 1978 required spaces had been identified authorized and filled as shown in Table 26 U During FY 1978 1 the EEO Office was tasked to furnish DA with a Case Study and Justification Folder on final structuring and consolidation of the INSCOM organization Among the five alternatives considered it was decided that there would be an adverse impact on both racial minorities and women under four of the five plans During the year there also remained the continual problem of obtaining a functional EEO statistical 81 - r 089 - Table 26 -EEO Office Staffing Position Grade-Seri es EEO Officer HR EO Officer EO Specialist EO Specialist EEO Clerk GS-0160-12 GS-0160-12 GS-0160-07 FWPM GS-0160-07 GS- 0301-05 TOTAL Rgr Auth l l l 1 1 l 1 1 _1 0 0 0 l 5 -3 l 1 4 Position filled with a temporary hire data base to be able to assess the co1T1Tiand EEO status for racial minorities and women The reason for this was the fact that INSCOM had to rely upon several different personnel reporting systems in effect among its worldwide units However the statistics obtained revealed that minorities increased their representation by 3 5 percent among the civilian workforce 59 INSCOM Human Relations E ual O ortunit Pro ram U Within INSCOM units t ere were ew any rac a pro ems nvo v ng the military populace Those reported centered primarily around individual disputes and were not indicative of the attitudes of the majority of unit personnel The attitude survey again indicated differences in perceptions between white and nonwhite personnel and some lack of trust in whites by non-whites However there were only slight indications that these attitudes resulted in any differences of treatment and they did represent an improvement over 1977 Total discrimination complaints dropped from 26 in 1977 to 25 in 1978 con tinuing a two-year downward trend U A statistical analysis of the co1T1Tiand by race and sex indicated fill slightly exceeded target levels established by HQDA Affirmative Action Plan A further examination of unit composition verified that fill levels were generally uniform throughout the conmand The DA goal set for INSCOM for Black fill was 12 44 percenti for 11 other11 racial groups 2 01 percenti and for female 12 08 percent The respective actual fill within INSCOM was 12 53 percent 1 23 percent and 13 85 percent U The raw data for the most part was insufficient to determine if adverse actions within INSCOM were biased against Blacks A paucity of cases existed in every area administrative discharges bars to reenlistment punitive discharges courts-martials and pretrial confinements except in the category of Article 15 Co1T1Tiand-wide Blacks received twice as many Article 15 s 24 31 percent Here the imbalance could be traced to two units USAFS Berlin and USAFS Korea and attributed to a combination of factors These included a predisposition of the commanders involved to utilize formal punishment to maintain order multiple offenders which distort statist csi 1 82 090 - and alleged racial bias at supervisor leve1 60 Upward Mobility Pro ram U Public Law 92-261 the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 required tat Federal agencies provide programs of training and education which would afford employees an opportunity to acquire skills and abilities needed to compete for advancement to positions of greater responsibilities Administrative procedures were developed to support the program e g INSCOM Regulation 690-17 Upward Mobility Program UMP and the UMP Procedures Manual were published a UMP Coordinator was appointed and a UMP Panel was established This panel consisted of the Equal Employment Opportunity Officer or his designated representative the UMP Coordinator or his designated representative and one supervisor selected from the Panel Referral Roster The panel would select the best qualified candidates for each position and forward the list of the best qualified candidates to the selection official for final action By the close of FY 1977 nine spaces had been identified to be filled under the Upward Mobility Program Three of these spaces were filled during FY 1978 Two of the candidates were selected for GS-06 Accounting Assistants one in OCSRM and one in Finance and Accounting with target positions of GS-07 Accountant The third candidate was selected for a current position GS-05 Signal Security siifant in DCSCI with target position of a GS-09 Signal Security Special st INSCOM Federal Women's Program U On l November 1977 a full time EEO Office was established which included a full time Federal Women's Program FWP Manager with responsibilities for clerical support of the office and a temporary hire of an EEO Assistant However in June the clerical responsibilities were dropped from the FWP Manager's job description and it became a full time EEO Specialist Conmand FWP Manager position Also in early FY 1978 the 66th MI Group designated a part time FWP Manager the first subordinate unit to do so U FWP highlights for the year included- 1 Hosting INSCOM's Second Annual Women's Week 11-14 October 1977 featuring Ms Jill Wine-Volner General Counsel of the ATTI Y as Keynote Speaker 2 sponsoring activities for Secretaries Week 24-28 April 1978 with guest speakers Congressman Clawson and Mrs Lucile Boyd 3 participating in the DA Advisory Group Colllnittee and 4 hosting the Third Annual Women's Week 18-22 September 1978 featuring Miss Ann Carachristi Chief A Group NSA as Keynote Speaker 62 Suggestions Program U During FY 1978 military personnel submitted 490 suggestions and civilian personnel submitted 50 for a total of 540 suggestions Of these 16 from the military and 8 from civilians were adopted In FY 1977 1 842 suggestions were submitted and 140 adopted Although the number of suggestions submitted and adopted were down in FY 1978 the tangible savings were up-$268 806 compared to $144 028 in FY 1977 63 Militarf-Civilian Team Day U On 14 April 1978 Arlington Hall Station hosted NSCOM' s Thi rd Annua 1 Military-Civilian Team Day An INSCOMFEST II 83 Ii 091 - was held and included a luncheon awards ceremony and an evening party At the luncheon BG John H Johns the Aney's Director of Human Resource Development hailed INSCOM as the first major convnand to address the military and civilian working relationship An evening of activity centered around a German theme to climax the annual event Many INSCOM units throughout the world held similar activities in recognition of the cooperation betwen their civilian and military communities U Awards based on worldwide competition within the Command were presented at HQ INSCOM on 14 April 1978 to the following recipients 64 Award Recipient The Albert W Small Award The Action Officer of the Year Award The Virginia McDill Award for Outstanding Secretarial Ability The Equal Employment Opportunity Award The Wage Grader of the Year Award The Non-Appropriated Fund Employee of the Year Award The Military-Civilian Team Improvement Award Mil 1tary Winner Ci vfl i an Winner Bruce W Stein James F Carmody Mari on E Glass Bonny Jo Perez William R Johnson Margaret P Scott COL L H Whitt George H Schmidt Conmand Infonnation Activities U In October 1977 the Public Affairs Office issued the first edition of the Journal of the US Arc'O Intelli ence and Securitf Command which replaced both the Hallmark INS M and t e IntelegramOSAINTA The first edition had 24 pages was printed in black and blue and was produced in a news magazine format under provisions of AR 360-81 During FY 1978 the monthly publication fluctuated between 20 and 32 pages and for three of the months was printed in color A reader ship survey conducted in June 1978 revealed that the Journal was well received and much improved from its predecessors U USA Field Station Augsburg's The Augsburg Profile received third place honors in the mimeograph multilith category of the 1977 Keith L Ware Awards Editor of the publication during the time of the competition was SGT Georgia L Seitz In addition US Army Field Station Korea's newspaper the Zoeckler Zephyr received the US Forces Korea Green Eyeshade Award for Excellence in Journalism for its November December 1977 issue Especially recognized were SSG Ralph Hopkins SP4 Marie Corinne Price and LT Thomas B Goode 65 U The following is a list of INSCOM publications as of 30 September 1978 84 092 Publication Unit The Journal Augsburg Profile Tori 1 Typhoon Write-On The Vanguard Zoeckl er Zeph r 66th MI Scram ler FS Bee 6 HQ INSCOM USA Field Station Augsburg USA Field Station Okinawa INSCOM CONUS MI Group SIGINT EW USAG Vint Hill Fanns Station USA Field Station Korea 66th MI Group USA Field Station Berlin Corrmander's Plague for Operational Achievement U The award of the Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement came about as a result of MG Rolya's visit to Headquarters Intelligence Centre Templer Barracks Ashford Kent England At the British Intelligence Corps Museum MG Rolya commented that he would like to initiate an award recognition similar to the British Intelligence Corps' Intelligencers Prize The Inte11igencers Prize was awarded annually in the fonn of Premium Bonds to any member of the Corps including Volunteers below the rank of Lieutenant Colonel whose activities during the previous year had brought particular credit to the organization Nominations with descriptions of how the nominee brought credit to the Corps were received by a panel of judges The name of the winner was then inscribed on the World Globe which was prominently displayed in the Corps Museum Based on this information the DCSOPS DCSITA DCSCI and CSM at HQ INSCOM provided their conmen ts concemi ng a similar award The DCSPER consolidated the input from the staff and provided the CG with a recommendation U INSCOM Regulation No 672-3 1 August 1978 established the Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement to be awarded annually to the nonsupervisory service member who made the single greatest contribution to the operational effectiveness of INSCOM during the preceding calendar year Consideration for nominations would include non-operational personnel whose accomplishments significantly impacted on the operational effectiveness of INSCOM Each major subordinate commander reporting directly to this Headquarters would nominate only one member of his her corrmand for consideration to arrive in ODCSPER not later than 15 February The plaque bearing the engraved name rank and organization of its winner would be prominently displayed at HQ INSCOM and a smaller replica of the plaque would be presented to the winner as a personal momenta of his her achievement Announcement of the winner was to be made by message not later than 15 April 66 Travis Troph Award U The Travis Trophy was originally presented in 1945 by Sir dward Travis as an award in athletic contests between US Anny and US Navy cryptologic activities in the cryptologic activities in the Washington D c area It was last awarded as an athletic trophy in 1948 On a visit to HQ USASA in 1964 LTG Gordon A Blake DIRNSA saw the trophy and had it reactivated as an annual award to the Service Cryptologic Agency which had made the most significant contribution in the areas of operations 85 er 093 - management administration and suggestions C- The Travis Trophy for CY 1977 was awarded to the 470th Military ntelligence Group for its contribution to the national intelligence communi Y b 1 Per NSA b 3 P L 86-36 Units receiving honora e men on were - 5 Naval Security Group Comnand and USA-518 Air Force Security Service The ceremony held on 27 September 1978 was the Fourteenth Annual Presentation of the Travis Trophy and represented an unprecedented third year in a row win for the Anny CY 1975 was shared with the Air Force for a total of seven trophies See appendix J for a list of previous Travis Trophy winners and the INSCOM nominees 86 HANDLE VtA COMl lCMANNELS ONLY t 094 l USA FOOTNOTES - CHAPTER V l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 28 RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT AHR DCSRM HQ INSCOM FY78 -St pp 19-25 Qtrly Prog Rev HQ INSCOM 3d 4th Qtrs FY78 C pp 42-43 p 6 resp AHR DCSRM HQ INS COM FY78 fSt I p 25 Ibid pp 37-38 'O'tr'fy Prag Revo HQ INS COM 4th Qtr FY78 tet- p 6 Surm ary of INSCOM Strength As of 30 Sep 78 C 27 Oct 78 AHR DCSTEL HQ INSCOM FY78 tet pp 7-10 Ibid pp 20-21 1978 USAINSCOM Corrmanders Conference PreConference Packet 23-27 Oct 78 -St pp F-13 F-14 AHR OCSTEL HQ INSCOM FY78 f-G pp 21-22 1978 USAINSCOM Comnanders Conference PreConference Packet tsi p F-13 1978 USAINSCOM Commanders Conference PreConference Packet-f-5-- p G-23 Ltr IARM-P o HQ INSCOM 28 Oct 77 subj INSCOM Resource Management Organization and Functions AHR INSCOM Data Systems Actv FY78 pp 34 46-48 55 56 1978 USAINSCOM Commanders Conference PreConference Packet S p G-25 AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO pp 9-12 Ltr CSA 21 Sep 77 Organizational Effectiveness Ann Hist Rev HQ INSCOM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMDIS pp 60-61 AHR DCSPER HQ rnscoM FY78 S-CCO p 19 Ibid p 36 Tbfcf pp 25-26 llild p 34 mer PP 21 28 l'bTd pp 21-23 Msg fm USAINSCOMDETNSA to CDR INSCOM DTG 1718552 Apr 78 S-CCO AHR CSOC FS San Antonio FY78 Vol I TSC NOFORN p 8 AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO pp 29 32 Ibid pp 57-59 T6Td pp 48-49 T61a pp 55-57 JmnHist Rev HQ INSCOM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMDIS p 62 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 86 Interview CW4 C W Courtney PTR Div ODCSOPS 26 Jun 79 ---------- 3 ck l A SE-0 HQ INSCOM 13 Apr 78 s bj - Per NSA b P L 1 HQ Ih n uri FY78 Vol I T OF pp 218-219 AHR OPPA HQ INSCOM FY78 Chap' p 1 Msg fm CINCUSAREUR to RUEACMD DA DTG 1513232 Dec 76 subj USA Russian Institute Civilian Authorization Ltr fm BG John A Smith Actg ACSI to CDR INSCOM 2 Aug 77 subj Proposal to Transfer USAIAREES to INSCOM Ltr fm COL John M Carr CofS INSCOM to HQDA DAMI-TST-1 22 Aug 77 subj Proposal to Transfer USAIAREES to INSCOM 29 DF IAOPS-SE-0 HQ INSCOM 24 Apr 78 subj Trip Report REDCOM-Sponsored JRX Initial Planning Conferences 30 AHR DCSOPS I HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS CCO NOFORN P l 002-203 Fact Sheet Lessons Learned From US Exercises 29 Sep 78 rJo AA DCSO S 87 nc USA FVEY 095 l USA b 1 Per NSA b 3 P L 86-36 31 AHR OCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 218 Vol III SC NOEORN Tab 92 32 AHR OCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN 1 p 218 33 Fact Sheet IAOPS-PTR 22 Sep 78 subj Anny Co11111anders 1 Conference Program to Fill Mobilization Manpower Base 34 AHR OCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I -rs ___ _ cc-o- N o-FO RN _ p 218 Ltr CDRINSCOM to HQDA DAAR-PEZ 3 Oct 77 subj Adjustment of Statutory Tour Positions 35 AHR OCSCI HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I pp 22-23 32 36 Ibid pp 74-75 and Vol III t-eh Tab JJ AHR CSF FY78 App A AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 f-S CCO p 24 37 AHR SJA HQ INSCOM FY78 pp 3-4 38 Ibid p 5 39 AHR OCSCI HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I pp 38-39 Hist Sum Poly Element ODCSCI IACI-OCI-0 1 2 Feb 79 40 AHR IG HQ INSCOM FY78 1 Chap II 41 AHR DCSOPS HQ INS COM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN 1 p 207 42 Msg fm CDRINSCOM to DA DAMI-TSS 3 Oct 77 subj Co11111and and Control Anny SIGINT EW Units C i MOU 28 Dec 77 subj Co11111and Control Employment and Technical Interface of Integrated US Army SIGINT Activities fEURt 43 AHR OCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 197 44 AHR DCSCI HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I pp 18-19 36-37i Vol II C Tab F AHR USACSF FY78 App c 45 1978 USAINSCOM Commanders Conference PreConference Packet S p F-18 46 AHR DCSLOG HQ INSCOM FY78 S CCO pp 17-26 47 Ibid pp 31-32 48 Afi'if I 1 FY78 Vol II p II I-13 Black Book Item IAOPSSE-0 and IALOG-IC 17 Apr 78 subj 1Construction C-CCO 49 ARR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCOJ Recoros Management Branch 50 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 166-169 51 AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO p 66 News Views Civilian Personnel Newsletter Jan 78 pp 2-4 52 AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO pp 78-79 53 Ibid p 81 Ltr IAPER-DCP 6 Sep 78 subj INSCOM Senior Level Position Ceil 1 ng 54 OF CofS HQ UISCOM 16 Jun 78 subj Flexitime 55 AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM 1 FY78 S CCO pp 80-81 56 Interview Dr Charles Gott Staff CPO HQ INSCOM w Mr James L Gilbert Hi story Office 17 May 79 57 AHR DCSCI HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I pp 20-21 58 AHR USACSF FY78 App D Statistical Su11111ary FOI PA 29 Nov 77 59 AHR DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S CCO pp 82-86 60 Ibid Tab A 61 T6To p 73 INSCOM FWP Bulletin Vol 3 No l Feb 78 p 8 62 AITTf DCSPER HQ INSCOM FY78 S CCO pp 92-94 63 Ibid p 68 64 Journal of the INSCOM May 1978 Vol I No 7 pp 10-13 65 AHR OPA HQ INSCOM FY7B pp 3-4 88 1 7 ' u-geou o t - 66 Ltr fm MAJ Stanley T Winarski Hq Intelligence Centre Templar Barracks Ashford Kent England to MG Rolya CG INSCOM 14 Dec 77 INSCOM Regulation No 672-3 l Aug 78 subj Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement 89 097 ECRET CHAPTER VI OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES US Signal Intelligence Directive USSID 1000 U After an extended period of coordination between INSCOM and NSACSS the latter published USSID 1000 SIGINT Tasking of the US Aney Intelligence and Security Conmand dated 14 December 1977 This was the first version of USSID 1000 to reflect the Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study IOSS and more specifically delineated Aney SCA functions under the INSCOM organization The writing of USSID 1000 was greatly facilitated by the fact that many of the major issues concerning relationships and mission ere resolved by other documents being agreed upon by DA INSCOM and NSACSS l - The primary SIGINT functions and tasks of CDR INSCOM as the Anny SCA are indicated as follows 1 Serves as Chief of the Anny SCA and conmander of the Aney's cryptologic element of the Central Security Service CSS Within this responsibility CDR INSCOM responds to the objectives of the United States SIGINT System USSS and is the non-tactical intelligence operator in general Arniy support 2 Provides advice and assistance on cryptologic operational matters to other major Aney conmands as appropriate 3 Serves as executive agent for peacetime utilization of Anny tactical SIGINT resources 4 Serves as the Aney representative to NSACSS for the USSID system 5 Assists Anny MACOM's as required to manage and distribute Consolidated Cryptologic Program CCP resources and DA in coordination of the SIGINT portion of major Program II Budget with NSA 000 and Congress 6 Participates with ACSI DA to prepare the Anny's SIGINT architecture and its fusion into the National SIGINT Plan 7 In coordination with ACSI DA and appropriate MACOM's participates with NSACSS to develop maintain a cryptologic personnel career development program 2 Development of Intelligence and EW S sterns U The Deputy Chief of Staff Systems HQ INSCOM was the principa staff assistant in coordinating matters within INSCOM pertaining to planning development and acquisition of INSCOM's requirements conceptual planning interoperability and systems management 1n support of field stations and intelligence EW Cl OPSEC HUMINT and Imagery units at theater echelons above corps In this capacity the DCSS 90 ' ' 098 SECRET REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON V- 1-iil-LL _ 1 $s BY USAINSCOM FOl PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR - CONFIDENTIAL 1 supervised several developmental studies during FY 1978 One such study was made by the Kuras-Altennan Corporation McLean Virginia who submitted a Technical Proposal for Echelons Above Corps Study Proposal No KA-4117 1 dated May 1978 An interim Technical Report on Intelligence Security and Electronic Warfare Support to EAC was submitted to INSCOM on 26 September 1978 It was anticipated that the study would provide an overview of the Joint National and Multi-national environments or contexts within which INSCOM must fill its assigned missions in accordance with AR 10-53 and FM 100-X Another objective of the study was to provide a concept of operations stenvni ng from the interaction of assigned roles and missions Finally it was hoped that major issues could be isolated so as to be addressed by future study and action U The Anny Cormnand and Control Master Plan a DA-directed study was conducted for the purpose of identifying the inputs and demands on the Anny Conmand and Control System through 1985 Through OOCSS participation INSCOM reviewed the contractor prepared studies for accuracy and consistency with other major planned actions U In 1975 the Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study IOSS recommended the integration of tactical all-source intelligence OPSEC and EW in support of Corps and lower echelons The Combat Electronic Warfare Intelligence CEWI concepts began to emerge in 1976 through TOE's and doctrinal literature Ongoing at this time was the testing of the CEWI Group through the preparation of a Group Force Development Test and Experimentation at Fort Hood Texas If successful the test results would have a significant impact upon INSCOM missions worldwide U On 29 September 1978 the Operating Systems Incorporated based in California launched a 17-month $190 000 effort to describe the analytical process from the cognitive standpoint The study was expected to have an impact on training analysis and ADP programning U INSCOM Pamphlet No 71-9 Test Materiel Acquisition Draft was introduced to provide a meaningful guide for INSCOM field commanders and staff officers to use in the fonnulation and processing of requirements documentation for the acquisition of Anny materiel to include INSCOM SIGINT Field Station tactical SIGINT EW equipment systems and other intelligence materiel requirements The pamphlet detailed the procedures INSCOM personnel must follow in order to initiate and process new equipment systems acquisitions documents lD CRITIC Program ___ -k --HQ INSCOM proposed that NSACSS conduct oversee CRITIC testing inasmuch as a unifonn procedure would be applied to all SCA s and that the testing function was one of a Central Security Service role to maintain 11 operational readiness 11 vis-a-vis an INSCOM unit training 11 role On 7 December 1977 1 NSACSS released three messages to the Major Anny Commands MACOM's concerned with SIGINT Essentially these messages1 - l --tet Non-concurred in INSCOM recommendations that NSACSS oversee 91 n g11r1DEUIIAL - 9 9 --j'1H Hf1-ll lfF-H' 3 4 P- R Hlll-llHL I-HU REGRADED lJNCLASSlFlED ON s y-tfJttL - t _ tf BY USAlNSCOM FOl A Auth Para 4-1 o DOiJ 00 l R - Anny testing and stated that CRITIC testing was considered a training function lJJ 2 --rc --Directed CDR INSCOM to establish a program and begin internal CRITIC testing in accordance with provisions of Annex M USSID 301 U 3 ffi Requested that CDR INSCOM develop schedule CRITIC tests in coordination with MACOM's for Aney tactical SIGINT units and include results in an Anny-wide consolidated quarterly CRITIC test evaluation report U As a result of these messages HQ INSCOM notified INSCOM field sites to begin CRITIC testing in accordance with Annex M USSID 301 In addition the headquarters informed other MACOM's of its intent to publish a supplementary INSCOM regulation to USSID 301 and invited them to participate in the regulation development 4 ---n--T % Field Assistance Su ort Team FAST Cance t The Field Assistance upport eam was roug t no e ng to r ge the gap between national level intelligence agencies and CONUS-based tactical units primarily those with worldwide quick reaction missions The FAST organization was flexible and designed to meet the needs of the alerted force G2 and other principal staff members Personnel from the USA Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center's Field Support Office who maintained a close working relationship with tactical units formed the nucleus of the team Personnel within INSCOM who had expertise in a variety of skills such as collection imagery or a first-hand knowledge of the objective area FAQ's etc were to be added to the team In the future it was hoped that the team would be enlarged to include available representatives of1 b 1 Per DIA- U The FAST concept was tested for the first time in support of XVIII Airborne Corps Exercise CABER WARRIOR V from 14 February to 11 March 1978 Again during 17-20 April the FAST concept was tested this time in support of the 24th Infantry Division's Ranger Exercise This was the first time that the concept was tested without prior knowledge by the national level intelligence agencies A team of ITAC analysts worked with the XVIII Airborne Corps G2 personnel providing extensive briefings and background data on North Korean combat capabilities The ITAC also provided timely imagery on the Korean DMZ and North Korean indications and warning targets An ITAC team stayed with 62 personnel throughout the exercise providing instruction on methods of testing national systems to satisfy tactical needs Next FAST received its first crisis support mission in support of the XVIII - nc 100 Freedom of Infonnation Act Privacy Act Deleted Page s Infonnation Sheet Indicated below are one or 1nore statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page 8J Infonnation has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption s b l Per DIA b l b 3 Per NSA It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and or the subject of your request D Infonnation originated with another government agency It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you D Information originated with one or more government agencies We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview Upon completion of our coordination we will advise you of their decision D Other DELETED P AGE S NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE Page s 101 IAGP A-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 SE CRET SPOKE b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA Non-Codeword SIGINT Reporting Program tCO An NSACSS ODO message of 19 July 1978 listed the main features of an expanded program to remove as far as possible restrictive C0MINT codeword caveats from reports using selected extracts of C0MINT-derived data The non-codeword NO program represented a positive step toward the improvement streamlining of C0MitlT dissemination to tactical users During wartime most products derived through plain text exploitation would be issued without codewords It was important that the Anr Y adopt a peacetime posture as close as possible to that expected in wartime The NCW program began to eliminate within the bounds of existent security discretion restrictions upon C0MINT dissemination from a producer The program did not involve INSC0M field sites 1 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA U -S---GCO- The Vice Chief of Staff US Army endorsed the NSACSS NCW program as - extremely beneficial for training and as a real contribution to readiness By late September 1978 the GUARDRAIL NCW reporting had been initiated as a test for eventual worldwide use 8 11 INSC0M oeerational Readiness Report U In addition to JCS and DA reporting requirements for unit readiness status data CDR INSC0M directed that all operational units submit a quarterly status report The purpose pf the report was to provide a vehicle for submitting a conmand readiness profile 94 - SECRET SPOKE Cl 102 CONFIDENTIAl 1 for use by the DA staff A pilot report was to be submitted for November 1978 After a process of development and coordination with the HQ INSCOM staff the standard JCS DA FORSTAT readiness report was selected as the base Operational Readiness Report ORR with selected topics added by command direction 9 U INSCOM Operations Regort te- -On 2 March 1978 the Intelligence Coordination Center ICC 0 CSOPS became responsible for the preparation and subsequent transmission of a weekly INSCOM Operations Report OPREP The purpose of the OPREP was to apprise the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence DA and INSCOM subordinate unit commanders of significant operational and reporting activity in areas of INSCOM interest The fonnat of the OPREP was divided by geographical regions Pacific Europe Western Hemisphere and by type of intelligence collection employed SIGINT HUMINT IMINT or Multidiscipline INSCOM field units submitted items for OPREP consideration which in turn were culled for pertinence and interest by ICC action officers The resultant product was then put into electrical message fonnat for transmission to OPREP addressees worldwide 10 C P Com any Corrmunication Facilit Development U During FY 1978 the Army's1rst automated transporta le communication facility COMFAC for the intelligence comnunity was under development and would be fielded in 1979 This transportable facility under the acronym COMFAC was conceived by the USACC-INSCOM to satisfy rapidly increasing tactical communication requirements COMFAC would provide highly unique automated conrnunication capabilities controlled by a AN UYK-19 computer system for handling both fonnal and infonnal traffic During field exercises traffic between a division EW company and the corps Control and Processing C P company averaged 300 messages per day This infonnation had to be manually processed for distribution within the corps Analysts at the C P company needed rapid access to the data and particularly the capability to discuss the data with analysts at other echelons by OPSCOMM circuitry COMFAC would give field units the fast reliable and flexible means to communicate this highly perishable signal intelligence data to the combat conmanders within the corps' area of operation COMFAC would support 19 secure full duplex circuits consisting of three medium speed AUTODIN DSSCS MODE I circuits operating up to 2400 baud and 16 low speed traffic and operational conrnunication circuits OPSCOMM The OPSCOMM circuits would be controlled by a central processor under which any subscriber to the system could be connected to any other subscriber U The COMFAC contract was awarded to ECI Division E Systems Incorporated on 8 September 1977 as an 18-month procurement package COMFAC was scheduled to be deployed to HHC 302d fiSA Battalion supporting the V Corps and the second COMFAC was scheduled for HHC 307th ASA Battalion supporting the VII Corps in Europe Both COMFAC's were scheduled for OT II testing in Europe during_the July 1979 time frame U Among the milestones occurring during FY 1978 were the following 95 - CONFIDENTIAL 103 f ECI REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON r'it-'lt _ L ic01E BY USAINSCOM FOY PA Auth Para 4-1 J 2 DOD 5200 lR completed the physical mock-up of the Crypto-Tech Control Van to government satisfaction in November 1977 the draft system hardware design plan was approved on 7 December 1977 the draft software design plan was reviewed and approved with changes by BCSTEL and DCSMIS during a 9-13 January reviewi and the COMFAC software for the MODE I interface successfully passed the CAT I test by the Defense Corm unications Agency DCA on 23 August 1978 U The COMFAC contract was to have been completed for an estimated $2 5 million However in June 1978 the government was informed that an extensive cost overrun of $2 million was anticipated Vendor related and unanticipated excessive costs for the procurement of the commercial hardware and complete military specifications MIL SPEC documentation for the subcontractors ran over $900 000 Burden rates and accounting charges authorized by public law led to another $350 000 Finally ECI underestimated the manhours and costs associated with the technical complexity of COMFAC by $750 000 U TRADOC was given three possible courses of action 1 Expend the $2 million 2 reduce the scope of the contract or 3 terminate the contract TRAOOC provided a statement of urgency for continuing the COMFAC project which was to be deployed to US Anny Europe DA approved the additional monies in sufficient time to preclude work stoppage although it appeared certain that the project would slip past its April 1979 deadline _11 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA - U - Pro ect EELPOT EELPOT was an NSA project conceived in 1973 to conso idate SAFSS and USAINSCOM HFDF Networks in Europe and the Pacific _ It was also to provide interface with the Nav 's B selected sltes In Novmeber 1977 HQ INSCOM and AFSS requested that con uct a complete review of Project EELPOT to determine the feasibility and cost effectiveness of completing the project In response to the Director's suggestion NSA decided it was necessary to recycle project EELPOT through the Requirements Review Group RRG and the Concept Review Group CRG process in accordance with NSA Circular 25-16 to revalidate the requirements for EELPOT and to determine if the EELPOT concept was adequate to meet the requirements tet As a result of the Requirements Review Group's meeting on 14 February 1978 NSA's Deputy Director Research and Development DOR was tasked to prepare a plan on how to compare the planned EELPOT capabilities with stated requirements HQ INSCOM provided input which disagreed with NSA's draft HFDF System Concept Paper SCP III INSCOM's objections were that the paper slanted toward justifying retention of EELPOT and failed to address a concept designed to meet the stated requirements Basically all parties except the SCP III action office DOR agreed that EELPOT should not be pursued further However the SCP III that was foNarded to the Concept Review Group conveyed only the DOR position Dissenting views were only covered in the executive surrrnary 96 g NflDENTijU 104 HANDL VI c MINt CHANNELS ONLY - i On 6 June 1978 the CRG reviewed the HFDF System Concept Paper Group members generally agreed that EELPOT should not be pursued and that the best alternative appeared to be retention and upgrade of existing HFDF networks using EELPOT resources when feasible Before making a final determination on the fate of EELPOT the CRG requested a cost analysis to determine cost impact of upgrading current nets In a 29 August 1 78 Memo DIRNSA advised the Assistant Di rector for Plans and Resources that he did not concur in only relying on SCA HFDF upgrades as the solution to EELPOT problems He requested a coherent long range strategy which insured development of a modernized worldwide interoperable system which was dollar constrained and used as much of EELPOT developed equipments systems as was feasible However at the end of FY 1978 a joint NSNSCA attempt to develop a course of action for a long range HFDF strategy in accordance with the Director's guidance was unsuccessful Consequently a NSA working group was fonned to develop the plan with SCA participation if desired 12 Direction Finding Nets At the close of FY 1978 finding OF net configurations were as follows 13 rnsc0t1 direction b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 97 i m- c 5 H t HDLE JPY1 COMIMI o CHANNELS O IL't INSCOM sites that participated in other SCA Nets were the following b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA - HANDLE V1A COMINl CHANNELS ONLY nr oQ b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA Sintle Station Locator-Europe -s--toJ The Joint Congressional Committee on he Department of Defense Appropriations for FY 1978 Report No 95-565 4 August 1977 deleted all funds from NSA's budget $1 SM for the Single Station Locator-Europe project In October a Resource Change Proposal RCP was resubmitted which identified the requirements for funding to procure and install a dual scope AN GSQ-185 SSL System in Europe The RCP was resubmitted under the Economic Stimulus package for FY 1978 pointing out the requirement for improving OF capability in Europe as well as providing for substantial savings in resources This resubmitted RCP was presented to NSA during the second quarter and identified funds for the FY 1978 program Although the RCP was not supported by NSA under the Economic Stimulus package the requirement for an SSL in Europe was resubmitted as an SCP-1 during 4th Qtr FY 1978 under the cover name of TRACKSTAR 15 HF Modemization Stu MAROON SHIELD ts-ecof The High Frequency HF fib ern zat on tu was an n- ept review of the MAROON SHIELD program and was initiated in Septent er 1977 The Defense Intelligence Program Guidance charged NSA in coordination with the Service Cryptologic Agencies to develop a plan to update the HF collection systems The HF Modemization Study was completed in April 1978 and after final coordination was published in June 1978 Upon publication of the new plan the term MAROON SHIELD was discontinued The study planned a multi-level program consisting of various degrees of modernization and remoting and increased manpower The stu impacted signifi antly on he INSCOM fie d_st tions j b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA - NOT RELEASABLE TO FORGBP1GN NATIONALS - - r 99 1 l 1-4 NDLE VI_ COMll 4l CI-IANNELS ONLY b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA TRUSTY HUNTER U The TRUSTY HUNTER program previously called Millimeter Wave Intercept System 1nvol ved the procurement of 10 complete 10-40 GHz nonco1T111unications intercept systems for US Army Europe tactical units These systems were given the nomenclature Receiving Set Countenneasures AN TLR-31 and were to be fielded with operation and maintenance manuals a one-year renewable maintenance contract two spares float kits and a built-in test capabilicy which was a later addition to the system Initially envisioned for the system test method was an independent calibration unit but after investigation into the connection problems encountered at the higher frequencies it was detennined that built-in test equipment was more practical It would give the operator and maintenance personnel a means for instant checks of the total receiving system without the costs of time and money incurred by having to insert an external signal The BITE was being added as a Value Engineering Change Proposal and was not expected to increase the overall cost of the program The TRUSTY HUNTER systems were configured to fit into existing spaces in the AN MLQ-24 Countermeasures Receiving Set The tuner enclosure and antenna system were mounted on the mast formerly used to mount the MLQ-24 secondary antenna Inside the shelter four pieces of equipment were added A control unit multifunction display servo-amp and power supply Although the TLR-31 was packaged for installation in the MLQ-24 there was no requirement for interconnection between the two and the TLR-31 could operate as a stand-alone system given an antenna mast and power source The power requirements were 115V AC 47-400 Hz single phase power at 10 Amps Y Fielding of the system to USAREUR Divisional Support Companies DSC's began on 13 May 1978 Final deliveries of the remaining systems 9 and 10 occurred at the end of August b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA One system from the 326th ASA Company under VII Corps control was permanently deployed to Mt Schneeberg for continuous long-tenn operations Other systems remained in garrison when not deployed to forward area sites or other areas for operator training collection missions TRUSTY HUNTER deployments surfaced a number of problems mostly hardware however these difficulties were not considered major in scope 18 Project Kunia CO While DA and INSCOM were exerting every effort during FY 1978 to assure ade uate base operations support to pennit long mo era ans on '-- --- NSACSS was in the same period developing another project which would eliminate the requirement for the station and result in its closure This was the Kunia Plan The genesis of the Kunia Plan was an NSACSS search for a site for an Alternate Remote Operating Facility ALTROF outside the Washington D c area for many cogent reasons including reduction of military build-up at the MAROON SHIELD Central Operating Facility COF at Fort George G Meade Maryland In response to an NOT RELEASABlE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS 100 A Hil MDLE Vl COMIMl -CMA lo ELS ONLY o ------------- - NSACSS 28 June 1977 request for candidates for ALTROF sites the Chief of Naval Operations on 29 August 1977 offered Kuni a Oahu as the only facility in Hawaii affording sufficient operations space for a projected 1 0002 000-man mission operation in an area where sufficient support facilities could be made available e g housing schools medical support exchange commissaries but not including BEQ and transportation The facility had been constructed in 1943 by the Anny Corps of Engineers originally as an underground aircraft assembly plant more recently in use as the Pacific Fleet Operations Control Center finally for ammunition torpedo storage In Navy hands since 1953 it had been subject of an Environmental Impact Assessment for deactivation and closure in December 1976 and had been detennined excess to Navy requirements for real property on Hawaii NSACSS dispatched a survey team to Hawaii in mid-October 1977 where it perfonned an in-depth review of the operational and support potential of the site facilities logistical and services support activities local environment etc Comparative surveys were accomplished at four CONUS sites Fort 1-tlnmouth New Jersey Goodfellow AF Base Texas Patrick AF Base Florida and Lowry AF Base Colorado The Patrick and Lowry AFB sites were eliminated as unsuitable Of the three remaining sites assessed as having good potential as Al TROF' s Kuni a was the preferred site On 22 February 1978 just prior to a Navy deadline for a report to Congress for disposition NSACSS stated official interest in Kun1a to the Assistant Secretary of Defense MRA L This request approved on 30 March 1978 granted NSACSS a 90-day period of analysis during which it was required to pay for protection and maintenance of the facility In a status briefing on 4 April 1978 DIRNSA tasked B Grou to examine the possibility of consolidating b 3 5o use 3024 i b 3 PL 86-36 b 1 Pe mission at Kunia Accordingly on 5 May 1978 the Remote Operations Planning Group ROPG coordinated with the NSACSS staff and the SCA's its preliminary plan for establishment of an ALTROF at Kunia with new emphasis on the consolidation of US collection processin and timel re ortin of ro ec e a van ages were o ac eve n emat ona a ance of payments IBOP savings reduce Program III manpower space requirement and in latter phases provide more capability and benefits to the cryptologic effort than the MAROON SHIELD replan A 19 May second draft of the Kunia Plan reflected the operation as a tri-service rather than a joint cryptologic facility with US Navy as DOD Executive Agent for host support The cryptologic host had not been designated Implicit in the plan was the I b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 101 - no -M t MOLE VIA COMlMl-CH 6-H ELS OHLJPY 109 SECRET S-CCO A revision of the Kunia Plan as briefed to DIRNSA and the SCA's on J e 978 included the followin has1ng Phase I b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA DIRNSA's reaction to this p ann ng was o name e nny nee the tar et date for IOC of the entire operation to FY 1980 In b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA S-CCO The Kunia Plan next appeared 19 June 1978 as a proposed Annex E Kunia Tri-Service Station Option of the HF Modernization Study The INSCOM colllllent to NSACSS on 3 July 1978 pointed out the following requirements 1 A clear definition of a Tri-Service Activity 2 an Alternate Intercept Collection Plan AICP for Kunia 3 the use of Program II personnel stationed on Hawaii 4 the need to address the impact of closure ofl 1 5 the need to use latest technology instead of currently available equipment and 6 the need for a site survey The earlier NSACSS survey of October 1977 had been for comparison of potential ALTROF sites rather than station establishment U S-CCO In the proposed Kunia Plan INSCOM was referred to variously as Executive Agent SCA host and BASOPS hosts 11 The USA Support Command Hawaii USASCH was already the established Anny base operations BASOPS host in the area reducing INSCOM's role to that of coordinator of requirements on behalf of Kunia Early action was required to coordinate detailed station support requirements with USASCH and other sources of support and to introduce requirements into the plans and programs of the appropriate supporting convnands to preclude later discovery of hidden costs U S-CCO The CDR INSCOM advised DIRNSA on 25 July 1978 of his intent to establish a Project Manager 1 s Office to provide a single management focal point to carry out his responsibilities as Executive Agent To support this requirement to DA DIRNSA was requested to designate INSCOM fonnally as Cryptologic Executive Agent for Kunia In a reply dated 11 August 1978 DIRNSA did not respond to this request but instead redes1gnated the Remote Operations Planning Group ROPG as the HF Modernization Group _ HFMG 102 ' 110 ECRIT T HANDLE VIA COMlt-ll CHANNELS ONLY -------------- charged with responsibility to develop a detailed plan for the Tri-Service SIGINT facility at Kunia INSCOM representation was requested CDR INSCOM designated COLD D Yoxthe1mer as INSCOM Project Manager to plan and implement the Kunia Remote Operations Facility and also as INSCOM Representative on th' HFMG U S-CCO Admiral Turner Director Central Intelligence Agency disapproved funding for Kunia NSACSS immediately made a reclama The reclama was also rejected softened somewhat as a disapproval for FY 1980 only which offered the possibility of only one year's delay However DIRNSA continued to press the project identifying in-house money-a proposed $5 million from MAROON ARCHER and $22 million from MAROON SCIMITAR This money was procurement money and did not satisfy the large initial requirement for OMA funding At the close of FY 1978 INSCOM was developing a concept of its role as Executive Agent and an outlinetogovem the conduct of a proposed site survey for Kunia 19 S b 1 Per DIA - NOT RELEASABLE TO FO REIGN NATIONALS _ ' f'r1110 3 tI ' ' HAHDI-GBP o11A COMIHl CHil MMEI S ONLY position horizontally polarized thereby changing its mini-directional transmit capability U severely 1mpact1ng on the possibility of success 20 TRIVIAL TIGER S NOFORN INSCOM special project TRIVIAL TIGER was associated with GRAVEL STREAM in that it utilized basically the same sensor unit See write-up on GRAVEL STREAM During the planning stages of GRAVEL STREAM an alternate means of enplacing the sensors within the target area was studied It was decided that two of the five GRAVEL STREAM sensors under fabrication at that time would be modified for hand-held operations A means of delivering these microminiaturized devices into the proper area was studied with the resultant sensor camera piggy back configuration The sensor was designed to fit an adapter that would attach to the 1000 MM Nikor lens used by the US Military Liaison Mission to Commander in Chi f Group of Soviet Forces Gennany USMLMCINCGSFG This effort became known as TRIVIAL TIGER Object of the project was to acquire Electro-Optics signals believed associated with such tactical devices as field artillery range finders helicopter-borne target designator and other weapons associated systems that might use lasers to increase offensive operational effectiveness Such targets were accessible as the US Military Liaison Mission members ohotographed systems of this type on a regular basis nn S NOFORN In September 1977 the sensors were rea ty for modification And by March 1978 the modifications had been accomplished and systems delivered S NOFORN On 24 April LTG Sir David Willison Director of General Intelligence Ministry of Defense K D Or F Allistair Johnson Director of Scientific and Technical Intelligence t O and COL Hall-Tipping Chief Defense Liaison Staff Washington D c were briefed on the INSCOM E-0 effort as well as being given a demonstration of the TRIVIAL TIGER sensor array The briefing was well received and LTG Willison stated his desire for increasing United States United Kingdom cooperative efforts and thought that TRIVIAL TIGER would be an excellent starting point He intended to bring BRISMIS British Military Liaison Mission personnel from Berlin to London during a proposed E-0 Conference 22-24 May of UK ACSI INSCOM personnel in order to discuss UK utilization of TRIVIAL TIGER by BRISMIS perosonnel Post-briefing conversations indicated a rea ty willingness on the part of 1 MOD to work with the United States on all aspects of E-0 col lection A1 l the close of FY 1978 TRIVIAL TIGER was being prepared for testing against I equipment at Fort Hood Texas 21 TOKAY MARC __ J eCOf In an attempt to enhance the capability of the Far East HFDF Net 30 a computer Data General C-300 system was procured to provide HFDF Mission Management This system allowed real-time on-line automated control over all Net control functions of the New 30 DF mission Field Systems Support Division FSSD perfonned initial system progra111T1ing software development the ODCSOPS provided operational guidance Initial conceptional planning had been that all debugging and initial acceptance testing would be perfonned prior to shipment of the system toe-- - ___ but slippage nd nstallation team availability dictated an early shipping date with f1nal1zation 104 NOT RELEASABLE JO FO REJGN - NATIONALS - - - - SF l rr b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA - SECRET b 3 so use 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA perfonned on site C The C-300 Computer System was installed at in Februar 1978 to perfonn on-line OF mission management for After adjustments on stat1Qn to speed up the 1 2 n-1 'rl i illTill o - c T i external tasker I J accepted the system on 4 May However it was noted in the acceptance message that the system did not meet all of'---- c JDF requirements An upgrade was planned for the TOKAY MARC system to rectify the shortcomings Although the upgrade was originally projected for July 1978 it slipped into the summer of 1979 22 GUARDRAIL V and UICKLOOK II C The next 9eneration of airborne intellisystems sate or p oyment was GUARDRAIL GR V and QUICKLOOK II GR V was a SIGINT system comprised of specially configured RU-21H aircraft one integrated processing facility IPF tactical commanders tenninals and assorted ground support equipment The Anny planned to deploy four systems each consisting of six aircraft The first oft e b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 1 Per NSA C QUICKLOOK II was an ELINT system comprised of specially configured OV-1 D Mohawk aircraft a ground processor and ground support system Six QUICKLOOK II aircraft were placed with each of four units The projected deployment schedule for QUICKLOOK II was similar to that of GUARDRAIL V Both were on the TOE of the PSA Company Avn Forward U During FY 1978 the staff of the Aviation Branch at HQ INSCOM spent many hours in consultation with US Anny Europe Commander US Forces Korea Troop Support Aviation and Readiness Corrmand TSARCOM Conrnunications and Electronics Materiel Readiness Corrmand and the system contractors The CDR INSCOM had directed that every effort be made to insure that the new systems would be fielded on time without degrading intelligence support to the supported corrmanders At the close of the fiscal year the deployment of the first GUARDRAIL V and QUICKLOOK II systems to USAREUR had begun it was anticipated that they would be operational by 1 January 1979 in time for REFORGER 79 exercise series 23 TRACER ROUND S-CCO TRACER ROUND was conceived at the USASA Training Center and School USPSATC s Fort Devens Massachusetts in November and December 1974 during a detailed COMINT anal sis of a Ma 19 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA ran ng eam ocumented serious inadequacies in the national technical data bases and re orted me b 3 50 use 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 05 - ECRET '' 113 HANDLE VIA COMIHl CHANNELS ONLY b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA rom s proposal evolved a concept plan which was approved by the ce hief of Staff US Anny on 25 August 1975 As a result of discussions between USASA and NSA a revised concept was written in June 1976 and approved by DA in September 1976 The revised conce t rovided a more balanced approach withe ual em hasis on - bJ 3Jsousc3024 iJ bJ 3JP L 86-36 b 1 PerNsA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 To support Project TRACER ROUND there was a 42-man CONUS element authorized the Signals Development Laboratory SOL which was ultimately located at Vint Hill Fanns Station Warrenton Virginia a 51-man European ______E _lement known_JlLSIUBBY PENCIL with 42 pe rs_cmneJ __auth a r_jzed at L__________ ' _ and 9 personnel authorized at - - - - - - - - J the Signals Warfare Laboratory fSWL located at Arlington Hall Station AHS Virginia a Project Manager also at AHS and a TRADOC re resentative located 1 - ---- --- b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA s eeof TRACER ROUND culminated in an operational test during January-March 1978 which wc1s designed __tQ__Jfemonstrate an tn-theaterl I -real-time processin and re ortin a conmander b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA - 106 -H NDlE AA COMINl CHAt4NELS ONLY CRET UMBRA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA U S CC0 The project test results demonstrated that TRACER ROUND as an en- tity provided a viable near real-time processing and reporting capability that would be responsive to the needs of the tactical conmander if communications were available timely and reliable This was evident in the USAREUR V Corps and VII Corps' positive evaluation of the TRACER ROUND test and project b 3 50 use 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA __ _S Ge tJThe project test results also demonstrated that the TRACER ROUND c Jata base was adequate maintainable retrievable and responsive This was further evidenced by an enthusiastic although infonnal evaluation of the c ktata base by both NSAL I national center SIGINT experts who reviewed t e___d cf r'i_n_g theJ I technical conference - Oithe 1 498 Tactical Reports TACREPS issued 1 377 provided data supporting the validity of the TRACER ROUND concept as an in-theater combat information production element This evaluation included an average overall report time from receipt of the intercepted raw data at TRACER ROUND test sites to TACREP production of 13 minutes an t in of the locations of b 3 50 use 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA This type o a a wou e nva ua e o e supper e ac ca conman ers in a wartime situation if conmunications could support the timely dissemination of the infonnation U S CC0 Even though TRACER ROUND was found to be a viable concept it was -- concluded that the current tactical SIGINT collection processing and communications capabilities could not effectively use contribute to or support a centralized analytical and processing system nor was a viable SIGINT management system available Tactical SIGINT EW production of combat intelligence had to rely on a smooth working system comprised of signal acquisition processing analysis reporting and corrmunication The front line intercept operator had to be continually appraised of the priorities and signal identifications resulting from rear echelon analysis The rear echelon had to be constantly updated with Corrmunications-electronics Operating Instructions CEOI and locational technical data from the front end operator 107 TO nr 115 CRET UMBRA b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA U b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA S CCC The project test results demonstrated that TRACER ROUND as an entity provided a viable near real-time processing and reporting capability that would be responsive to the needs of the tactical conmander if communications were available timely and reliable This was evident in the USAREUR V Corps and VII Corps' positive evaluation of the TRACER ROUND test and project j_S GeO The project test results also demonstrated that the TRACER ROUND c 1ata base was adequate maintainable retrievable and responsive This was further evidenced by an enthusiastic although infonnal evaluation of the c lata base by both NS_AL I national center SIGINT experts who reviewed the__data-hase-cluring_J heJ I technical conference -1 498 -- f - e T c-tf al--Reports TACREPS issued 1 377 provided data supporting the validity of the TRACER ROUND concept as an in-theater combat infonnation production element This evaluation included an average overall report time from receipt of the intercepted raw data at TRACER ROUND test sites to TACREP production of 13 minutesi and the identification and reportcations of b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA This type - o f da t a w o u 1 d7 b - e --r n - v a ua e- o 'e ---- -su p_ p o ri e - a c -- -- ---- - - - - -Ji n a warti me situation if conmunications could support the timely dissemination of the in fonnat ion U S CCO Even though TRACER ROUND was found to be a viable concept it was concluded that the current tactical SIGINT collection processing and communications capabilities could not effectively use contribute to or support a centralized analytical and processing systemi nor was a viable SIGINT management system available Tactical SIGINT EW production of combat intelligence had to rely on a smooth working system comprised of signal acquisition processing analysis reporting and conmunication The front line intercept operator had to be continually appraised of the priorities and signal identifications resulting from rear echelon analysis The rear echelon had to be constantly updated with Conmunications-electronics Operating Instructions CEOI and locational technical data from the front end operator 107 TO ' ' 115 - or these targets which required sophisticated centralized processing neither the intercept operation nor the rear echelon analysis and reporting operation could function without the other However a synergistic mechanism did not exist and only an effective co11111unfcations link-up between them permitted them to function at-all - U-sy l June 1978 the equipment and personnel assigned to Project TRACER ROUND had been transferred Many of the reconmendations and findings of the project were left unresolved but the basic analytical techniques were being recognized and used at NSA and worldwide 24 SIGSEC Positions U The table below depicts the status of progra11111ed and actual COMSEC monitoring and TEMPEST test positions for 4th Qtr FY 1978 25 Table 27 -SIGSEC Positions Monitoring Radio Telephone Prog Act Unit CI SIGSEC Bn Ft Meade CI SIGSEC Bn Ft Sam Houston CI SI GSEC Bn Presf dio of SF INSCOM Det Hawaii 209th MI Det Scty Det Korea 66th MI Gp TEMPEST Test Conventf onal Telephone Prog Act Ff el d Act Prog 0 0 4 4 4 4 l l 6 6 l l 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 l 0 0 2 2 2 l l 0 l l 2 l l 0 l l l SIGSEC Sup ort Activities U Support activities of INSCOM SIGSEC units worldwide n terms of monitoring and analysis missions cryptofacility inspections and approvals and TEMPEST inspections and tests conducted during FY 1978 are shown in table below 26 Table 28 -SIGSEC Support Activities Mon1 tori ng and Ana1 sis Missions RATE Convl Tel Worl clwi de 47 110 TEMPEST Cryptof aci l i ty lnsp Appr n e 345 603 913 Fld Test 98 108 HANDLE VIA COMINT CHAMt om s Oo LY - - SIGSEC Publications U During FY 1978 the following actions were taken in regard to publications on signal security 1 AR 530-3 Electronic Security A draft revision of this regulation was submitted to HQDA 1n August 1977 HQDA then staffed the regulation and submitted it to The Adjutant General's Office TAGO for publication TAGO reviewed and edited the draft and returned it to DCSOPS DA for additional editorial corrections On 9 March 1978 DCSOPS DA requested that INSCOM assume proponency for AR 530-3 INSCOM accepted proponency on 31 March made the required editorial corrections restaffed the draft with the DA staff and the MACCt1's and resubmitted it to TAGO on 14 August 1978 2 AR 530-4 Control of Compromising Emanations The proposed revision of this regulation was submitted to HQDA on 13 May 1977 DCSOPS DA staffed the regulation and submitted it to TAGO for publication TAGO reviewed the draft and returned it to DCSOPS DA for editorial corrections On 9 March 1978 HQDA requested that INSCOM assume proponency for AR 530-4 On 31 March INSroM accepted proponency made the required editorial corrections restaffed the draft and resubmitted it to TAGO on 28 April The AR was published and dated 15 August 1978 3 TB 530-1 Identification and Application of Compromising Emanations Control Measures The revision was completed and the draft submitted to TAGO for publication on 21 June 1978 The revised Technical Bulletin included a new set of eligibility criteria for the TEMPEST testing of those facilities which electrically processed classified infonnation The revision also removed the prohibition against testing high level teletypewriters and hardened sites 4 TB 380-7 TEMPEST Inspection and Test This Technical Bulletin TB provided technical guidance for the conducting of TEMPEST support activities prescribed technical procedures for the reporting of TEMPEST support operations and introduced commands to the basic TEMPEST support available to them from INSCOM The TB was submitted to TAGO during the last report period On 12 October 1977 advance copies were provided INSCOM TEMPEST units and select MACOM headquarters Subsequently the manuscript was edited at HQDA and on 21 March 1978 editorial changes were provided recipients of the advanced copies The TB was published and dated June 1978 27 %-Geet - LEFOX PURPLE AN FSQ-88 V2 LEFOX PURPLE LFP was a fixed site application o t e LEFOX GEV program LEFOX GREY was laboratory tested in 1969 and an operational test was conducted at Berlin in 1970 and 1971 The contract for LEFOX PURPLE was awarded in 1973 and the system acceptance test was conducted at the contractor's facility during the latter part of 1976 LEFOX PURPLE installation atc___ _ __jwas canpleted in May 1977 and the on-site acceptance test was conducted during May and June 1977 The system became fully operational on 29 August and the on-site user test was conducted from l September to 15 December 1977 Overall the system improved and expandedc_______ capabilities in accomplishing the VHF UHF mission 109 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 0 117 -HANDLE IIA COMINl CHANNELS ONLY - There were four major operational advantages provided by the LEFOX PURPLE system Collection volume using LEFOX PURPLE increased an average of 91 4 percent over conventional operations Scan ratios the time spent transcribing intercept were decreased by LEFOX PURPLE operations The exact amount of decrease varied greatly with the material being processed but overall the decrease was 25 1 percent Processing throughput times were improved The average time between intercept and technical reporting STRUM were reduced by 34 percent Product reporting timeliness improved approximately 40 percent o Detailed displays provided supervisors with explicit real-time management and target infonnation on the status of collection and processing resources and on the progress of intercept through the stages of the processing cycle thus pennitting more effective control The LEFOX PURPLE system was an effective tool that increased I e Jcapabilities to effectively and efficiently collect transcrib e- -a-n d- report clear voice intercept LEFOX PURPLE also represented a significant almost revolutionary advance in the clear voice processing field It had gained the acceptance and trust of the user and was preferred over the conventional system 28 Field Station Position Manning S-eCOfThe table below indicates field station position manning as of the end of the 4th Qtr FY 1978 29 Table 29 -Position Manning b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA INSCOM TOTAL Position Equivalents Programmed Manned % Manned 114 08 65 08 25 00 14 08 4 16 l 08 105 07 54 08 24 22 14 08 4 16 l 16 92 l 83 2 99 7 100 0 100 0 125 0 223 08 226 02 - 101 0 Project MUDPACK ff Project MUDPACK began in 1974 and consolidated the wideband retrievaTefforts of USASA and USAFSS at Medina Texas The consolidation was directed to achieve reduced cryptologic manpower ceilings imposed by Program Budget Decision 289 USASA accepted the consolidation but opposed the utilization of 300 direct support spaces in the effort After extensive negoti ati onsL NSACSS approved USASA' s propo s_al_ whereby 225 Program 3 spaces at l - - J would be transferred to-- In turn 225 personnel from the 502d ASA Group in Gennany would fill t h-e void left by the transfer of these spaces Thi USASA proposal was approved by NSACSS in May 1974 and went into effect in July 1974 Over f- 110 b 3 P L 86-36 jEGRET t - 118 HANDLE VIA COMINl CHANNELS 01'41 Y b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per - NSA the months hCMever it became increasingly difficult for ttJe Anny to honor the conmitment because of recruitment and training st1prtfa11s Attempts were made to fill the MUDPACK commitment at apprp imately a 65 percent level ke1' In December 1976 INSCOM 1 s po11 cy concerning MUDP ci fi 11 was cl ari- fi ed whereby the 502d ASA Group soon to be assigned tV USAREUR would continue to fill the conmitment in proportion to the Pel iOnnel assigned This action coordinated with NSA and USAREUR reduced MU PACK spaces to 182 in FY 1978 It was later learned that USAREUR was C91Ttnvftted to an even lower rate of actual f111 than I NSCOM h'ad previously att pted to fil 1 During the 4th Qtr FY 1978 MUDPACK reached the low ebp 91 42 percent fil 1 The number of MUDPACK personnel assigned with duty att J decreased continuously throughout the year to a point where collection positions were not being manned due to pe rsonne 1 shortages 1 MCO l I b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 PL 86-36 b 1 Per NSA uring the 4th Qtr FY 1978 the CDR I 1 I requested HQ INSCOM to investigate the po s 11 v of reassigning those USAREUR personnel filling MUDPACK slots to L __ _ I In response BG Freeze DCG-1 stated that such an action wou on y tend to further confuse and compound an already Aney-wide shortage of 98 CMF personnel 30 1 Advanced GOODKIN Acquisition System AGAS S-CCO Project GOODKIN was an automatic spectrum scanning system capable of signal detection analysis and reporting It could be progranmed to scan a continuous portion of the radio frequency RF spectrum and also to recognize various types of signal modulation Project GOODKIN was first operated in the wideband environment at the Consolidated Security Operations Center CSOC San Antonio Texas and proved to be cost effective in providing intercept operator manpower savings P' ec The GOODKIN system was deployed to I I in March 1976 Following the return of GOODKIN to CSOC NSACSS t1as advised that HQ INSCOM intended to conduct additional tests with the ystem and that the installation at b 3 P L --L_ OC was not considered penn_a nent On 6 July 1977 NSACSS AFSS 86-36 and were advised of the HQ INSCOM decision to test I I On -- 15 u y CSS non concurred in the p1roposal Because th re was an Anny shortage of OSH personnel at CSOC tNSCOM agreed to l t the GOODKIN system remain at1 CSOC until 31 December 19-77 --eeet I FY 1978 attent1 on sh ffted away from redeployment of the GOODKIN - acquisition1system I Ito nstallmen of the new Advanced GOODKIN Acqufs1t1on System at CSOC as a r phcement As a result of a $1 864 million 1 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 111 HAN8LE VIA COMIM1 CIIANNELS ONLY b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA f I the months hCMever it became increasingly difficult for t Anny to honor the corrmitment because of recruitment and training shortfalls Attempts were made to fill the MUDPACK commitment at approximately a 65 percent level t keJ In December 1976 INSCOM's policy concerning MUDPACK fill was clarified whereby the 502d A Group soon to be assigned to' USAREUR would continue to fill the conrnitment in proportion to the per onnel assigned This action coordinated with NSA and USAREUR reduced MUDPACK spaces to 182 in FY 1978 It was later learned that USAREUR was committed to an even lower rate of actua 1 fi 11 than I NSCOM had previously attempted to fil 1 During the 4th Qtr FY 1978 MUDPACK reached the 1ow ebb f 42 oercenf fi 11 The number of MUDPACK personnel assigned with duty at _decreased continuously throughout the year to a point where collection positions were not being manned due to personnel shortages I I b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA Auring the 4th Qtr FY 1978 the CDR Io I requested HQ INSCOM to investigate the possibility of reassigning those USAREUR personnel fil 1- 1 ing MUDPACK slots tor o o In response BG Freeze DCG-1 stated 1 that such an action would only tend to further confuse and compound an already Anny-wide shortage of 98 CMF personnel 30 1 Advanced GOODKIN Acquisition System AGAS S-CCO Project GOODKIN was an automatic spectrum scanning system capable of signal detection analysis and reporting It could be progranmed to scan a continuous portion of the radio frequency RF spectrum and also to recognize various types of signal roodulation Project GOODKIN was first operated in the wideband environment at the Consoli dated Security Operations Center CSOC San Antonio Texas and proved to be cost effective in providing intercept operator manpower savings s 'tt b 3 P L 86-36 The GOODKIN system was deployed tol lin March 1976 Following the return of GOODKIN to CSOC NSACSS was advised that HQ INSCOM intended to conduct additional tests with the $YStem and that the installation at - - e CSOC was not considered penna11ent On 6 July 1977 NSACSS AFSS and I were adv1 sed of the HQ INSCOM dec1si on to test On l Suly NSACSS non concurred 1n the proposal Because there was an Anny shortage of OSH personnel at CSOC I NSCOM agreed to let the GOODKIN system remainat 1CSOC until 31 December 1977 1 o s --eeet - 1 I FY 1978 1 attention shifted awa y fro redeployment of the GOODKIN acquisition system I Ito installmen of the new Advanced GOODKIN Acquisition System at CSOC s a r placement As a result of a $1 864 million ' 'II ---- ------ 1 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA I 111 HANDLE VlA COMIHl c111 Nt ELS o aLY b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA T TSPOKE cut from the FY 1979 intelligence budget the impact on operatf onal problems for AGAS GOODKIN programs had to be reevaluated There was also concern among CSOC managers regarding which methods would be used to prioritize the tasking -tee- On 6 June 1978 the GOODKIN test acility was tenninated at CSOC f - ccordance with contractual agreement GOODKIN was deinstalled during 11-13 June 1978 and the hardware was shipped to the Signals Warfare Laboratory at Vint Hill Fanns Station The ten GOODKIN positions were dismantled and the mission which was assigned to the GOODKIN positions was transferred to conventional positions On 26 Septermer 1978 AGAS operating consoles were installed and tasked Plans were that two positions were scheduled to be used as a test position in the system development module one position was scheduled to be unmanned and used for acquisition alanning on I I single-channel printer activity The AGAS turn-on date was scheduled for early FY 1979 31 5-EURGBP8 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA MAROON SAIL ft demization Pro ect at FS Homestead FY 1978 witnessed t e na zat on o mo em zat an p ann ng or t e implementation of the MAROON SAIL progra in FY 1979 The program would update analytical and collection functions at FS Homestead to the latest state of the art possibl e Analysts would have direct access to on-station computers to obtain fonnatted analytical infonnation on a real-time basis as a means of providing instantaneous collection analysis and product reporting support to the ---- tP1Q logic__n_f__0__rtagainst-c J Planning throughout the year consisted of - determining the computer programs necessary to support the Anny analysis and reporting m1ss1on and of detennining the necessary floor plan and space required for the MAROON SAIL configuration A final detennination was developed for floor space necessary in the temporary location of the station offices while the modernization effort was being completed SG- At the close o f FY 1978 planning called for FS Homestead to relocate to its year long temporary spaces in early December It was further anticipated that the modernization program would be completed in accordance with 112 - TSPOKE 120 ' ' ----------- b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA TSPOKE two milestones The first was to be the completion of the initial operating capability in February 1980 in which major portions of the MAROON SAIL system were to be operational The second milestone was set for December 1980 at which time all aspects and capabilities of the MAROON SAIL system were to be fully operational j5t This entire modernization project was a follow-on to a similar effort underway at the Navy Cryptologic site at I I Due to the small size of this unit modernization at Homestaed would have a measurable but not an oveNhelmin im 33 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 113 TSPOKE 121 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA Project SEEK -- -C HOFORN Project SEEK a positive intelligence collection program of interviews and debriefings of Jewish and other emigres from the USSR was fanned from Operation STRAW JEWEL which was begun on 10 May 1974 The 902d Military Intelligence Group first implemented the debriefing program at Fort George G Meade utilizing linguistic assets of the 528th Military Intelligence Company Involvement by DA was based upon a Memorandum of Understanding between the Domestic Collection Division Central Intelligence Agency and OACSI dated 29 May 1974 The mission of the project was to collect and report intelligence infonnation derived from the debriefing of Soviiet Jewish emi gres After the inactivation of the 528th Military Intelligence Company the responsibility for STRAW JEWEL was transferred to the Free World Division of the Directorate of Operations USAINTA U fG NOFORN In February 1975 this national collection effort became known as Project SEEK The first linguist asset specifically dedicated to Project SEEK was assigned to the Free World Division in April 1975 By early 1976 five persons had been assigned with SEEK responsibilities In February 1976 the Directorate of Operations was reorganized and Project SEEK was assigned to the newly created Detachment o USAINTA fanned from the discontinued Washington Field Office of the Free World Division LTC Calvin Korf was named Detachment Corrunander The physical location of Project SEEK was moved from USAINTA Headquarters to the building at Columbia Pike in Arlington Virginia and subsequently in May 1976 to the Hoffman Building South in Alexandria Virginia tJ -teiNOFORN Project SEEK thus became buried within the framework of a related but by nature remote positive collection activity While most of the activity of Detachment O centered on contacts with US official personnel Project SEEK dealt with alien parolees unfamiliar with their new country of residence and still very much in the shadow of the closed society which they had recently left The burden carried by two contact specialists linguists was overwhelming From 300 to 400 prospects required assessment in 1976 Debriefers were both contact specialists and administrators editors and substantive reviewers Their administrative tasks were interspersed with TOY So the contact specialist remaining behind to carry out adninistrative chores was not completely in the picture concerning activity which went on during his temporary absences The different collection mission of the rest of the detachment resulted in lack of co111nand emphasis on the program Ms Snider was named Chief of Project SEEK within Detachment 0 in March 1976 Her liaison duties occupied the majority of her time - 114 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS ----- f 122 -------------- U C NOFORN Project SEEK continued to suffer from lack of personnel but due to increased emphasis at all levels of Intelligence Community USAINTA decided in conjunction with ACSI I __ to increase Anny's efforts on behalf of Project SEEK On 16 October 1977 Project Seek personnel moved from Alexandria to Building 2841 at Fort Meade With the occupation of pennanent Project headquarters came a slow buildup of personnel offset again and again through scheduled and unscheduled losses due to medical discharges voluntary releases from active duty ETS etc Personnel buildup was followed slowly by personnel authorizations The senior member of the SEEK Project obtained an authorized position through the CONUS retention of a valid overseas Aney Interrogation Unit slot in 1974 In spite of the fact that as of 30 September 1978 Project SEEK numbered 16 personnel the only authorized personnel were two warrant lfficers one enlisted TAREX specialist and one In addition to the 16 assigned Project SEEK regularly received TOY assistance from personnel stationed at Fort Bragg North Caroli a and Fort Hood Texas During FY 1978 actions were being taken to increase the number of authorized spaces to 36 by A'-1980 Still the number of assigned personnel fell short of the potential SEEK sources t f b 1 Per DIA-- C Deployment of Detachment E USA OGerational Group S NOFORN The genesis of Detachment E USA Operational roup was found in the abortive plans of 1974 to establish a Middle-East detachment in USAREUR Later it becam evident that the Westem European scientific community offered a lucrative area for satisfying national requirements concerning Soviet Military R D targets On 31 March 1977 a Memorandum of Agreement MOA was signed between DCSI USAREUR and CCR INSCOM which allotted deep Warsaw Pact USSR targets to INSCOM On 17 May 1971 the DCSOPS DA approved a 20-man increase in USAREUR personnel strength to accorrrnodate the establishment of Detachment E in the Federal Republic of Gennany FRG The initial elements of Detachment E arrived in Munich during August 1978 U - S NOFORN The mission of Detachment E was to plan coordinate and conduct clandestine HUMINT collection operations against the USSR selected Mid-East states the People's Republic of China and the People's Democratic Republic of Korea from the FRG in response to Department of the A 11 Y and Department of Defense strategic collection requirements 36 Iranian Liaison The mission of Detachment I USA Operational Group was to conduct liaison activities on behalf of INSCOM with the Iranian J 2 andits operating commands and to support those liaison projects of 115 NOT RElEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS - JEE ' 123 - b 1 Per DIA b 1 U ---- C _As - in FY 1977 activities surrounding the process of approving the new Panama Canal Treaties dominated the operational scene during FY 1978 Revevant key developments 1nc1uded the successful treaty plebiscite in Panama 116 NOT RELEASABLE JO FD REIGN NATIONALS _--- IL__ _ _ -b - 1 --- -----------------in October 1977 the US Senate Treaty ratification period which culminated in April 1978 and the US President's visit to Panama to exchange the instruments of ratification in June 1978 Each of these periods required unusually extensive collection and collection support activities on the part of the Group with particular emphasis on official attitudes and dissident activities in Panama as well as contingency planning on the part of Panamanian authorities in the event the Treaties were not approved J efAs a result of its efforts the470th Group received various recognitions including the fol lowing Letter of r ommendation from the ACSI 39 b 1 Per CIA e a e par men an bassador swort unker for the timely accurate and important information furnished by the intelligence conmunity to US negotiators involved in the recently ratified Panama Canal treaties The 470th Military Intelligence Group was specifically cited f or its contribution which enabled US negotiators to bargain from an advantageous position of knowledge j-efI would like to add my personel appreciation I bJ 1 PercIA o bJ 1-JPerc1A for the 470th MI Group's professional effort in col ect1ng compiling and expeditiously disseminating intelligence of vital importance to the US negotiators I Post Panama Canal Treatl Planning S NOFORN Post-treaty planning was an on-going process throughout FY 1978 It was not planned to eliminate any of the Group s missions as a direct result of implementation of the first Panama Canal Treaty Implementation Treaty scheduled for 1 October 1979 hence planning for future operations in a nevertheless changing changed environment was a high priority ongoin requirement The desire of the r onmander in Chief US Southern ColtlTland CINCUSSOUTHCOM for the 470th MI Group L b 1 to have a post-treaty collection capability resembling its present one- a t- least during the three-year transition period was summed up in a message he sent to the INSCOM r onmander on 14 July 1978 1 I b 1 S-Jg RN As early as October 1977 a post-treaty operational review emphasizing considerations effecting HUMINT and CI activities was fonnulated in elaborate detail Later in March 1978 a refined CI post-treaty concept 117 NOT RELEASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS - I - 125 b 1 L _ _ _ _ _ - was drawn up envisioning greatly enhanced needs in the area of countering opposition intelligence efforts in the Group's area of responsibility s JJ RN Specifically planned for implementation in the post-treaty period were the following A new deep-cover HUMINT collection element which would operate under clandestine collection projects currently in effect or such other projects as might replace or supplement them enhanced cover support for existing collection operations as they phase down taking into consideration a new and more restrictive collection environment receipt of a new controlled collection objective CCO pertaining to Soviet Bloc activities in Latin America and bilateral operations with the National Guard G-2 currently foreseen for implementation during the 1980-1984 time frame Finally plans were completed for the 470th MI Group b 1 Ito relocate within the Panama Canal area The major portion of the Group would relocate to the Cerro Corozal area At this location HUMINT and CI operations I lwoul d be reported The b 1 I Mini-Camera of the 470th MI Group S NOFORN On 22 September 1978 the 470th MI Group in Panama produced the first known INSCOM operational intelligence by mini-camera The mission was to photograph Enrique Malek Airfield which was located in the northern part of Panama near the Costa Rican border The platfonn for the mission was a Gamboa canal Zone Aviation Club two-place fixed wing aircraft piloted by an American and flown on a typical student training flight plan Photographs taken showed four Venezuelan jet aircraft T-22 and a transport plane These aircraft were movedtothe airfield in support of a contingency plan to support the Sandinista Rebels in Nicaragua S NOFORN The mini-camera had a NIKON body with a specially modified lens and high resolution film and processing technique Because the lens was ordinary in appearance and unobtrusive the camera appeared to be like any photographer's NIKON with a motor drive and could be used to obtain intelligence photographs without arousing any undue scrutiny 41 Products Produced by US A s Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center U The table below lists s gnificant products produced by ITAC 42 Table 30 -Products Produced by ITAC Date Published Title - Base Development Study Dharan Rao Tanura Ad Danman A-4 Libya Benghazi Libya Al Bayda 118 NOT RREASABLE TO FOREIGN NATIONALS Dec 77 Jan 78 Mar 78 Products Produced by TAC-Continued Date Libya Libya Syria Syria Syria Syria Syria Country Resume Damah Country Resume Damascus Latakia Dara Tartus Published Mar Mar Mar Jun Jun Jun Aug 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Drop Zone Study Haiti A-2 Mar 78 Emergency Evacuation Studies Libya Morocco Jordan Nov 77 Feb 78 Jan 78 Ground Forces Order of Battle Books Israel Persian Gulf States Algeria Syria Iran Iraq Morocco Nov 77 Dec 77 Jan Mar May Jun Jun 78 78 78 78 78 Handbooks of Military Forces Jordan Saudi Arabia Nov 77 May 78 Three Mission Oriented Packages Oct 77 Dec 77 Jan 78 Special Study Bahamas Nov 77 Tactical Col 'l11ander's Terrain Analysis I ran o Mes had Jun 78 Telecol 'l11unication Electric Power Facility Study Cuba Feb 78 119 127 Products Produced by TAC-Continued Title Date Published Studies IAG-I-SNF-78 Ethiopia-Somalia Comparison IAG-2-SI-78 Helicopter Support of Soviet Ground Forces IAG-6-SI-78 Soviet Intelligence Assets Criticality and Vulnerability IAG-7-S-78 The Role of Annor in the PRC Annor and Mechanized IAG-16-SNF-78 Egypt - Infantry and Special Forces Capabilities IAG-26-SI SAO G-78 Trends in Warsaw Pact Exercises from 1961-1976 IAG-35-U-78 US and Soviet Division Comparison IAG-39-SNF-78 North Korean Artillery Force ATC-CR-1100-060-78 South African Anns Procurement ATC-CR-1100-077-78 Warsaw Pact Northern Front ATC-CR-1100-078-78 Use of Smoke in Soviet Tactics ATC-CR-1100-081-78 Soviet Antitank Doctrine Tactics Organization Weapons and Training Sep 77 Jan 78 Dec 77 Dec 77 Jan 78 Mar May Mar Jul Aug Sep 78 78 78 78 78 78 Aug 78 NATO Readiness 'in North AG Study Input to AFPDA CAA Input to COSAGE CAA ColT'IOOnality of Anlnunition Study DCSOPS Tank Comparison Study DCSOPS POL Vulnerability Assessment DAPE Political Projections for Eventual Employment of US Special Forces in the Middle East USA War College Political Projections for Eventual Employment of Special Forces in Greece and Turkey USA War College Input to OSD New Assessment Project on Comparison Between US and Soviet Special Forces Concepts and Utilization Input to OSD Net Assessment on NATO Mobilization Procedures Stand Off Target Acquisition System Threat Annex Threat Packages for IFV CFV Taks Force Air Threat to Central Europe Unconventional Warfare Operations Against NATO Threat Annex to AFPDA Soviet Extended Planning Annex 120 - ' 128 May Jul Aug Sep 78 78 78 78 CfJNffBENTIA j Products Produced by TAC-Continued Title Briefings MG Mahaffey briefed OS0 0 '3 on IFV CFV SSG report ARM briefing presented by FTO to Under Secretary of the Anny 19 Oct 78 17 Oct 78 U Peacetime Utilization Pro ram REDTRAIN tGBP CCO For some years it was apparent tat SI N resources n t e USASA Direct Support OS units were underutilized With the increasing constraints on funds and manpower it became imperative that these OS uni ts be thoroughly trained and capable of providing effective SIGINT support In addition some of the DS units were ideally located and had the capability to perfonn SIGINT missions contributing to national and Anny intelligence requirements while continuing to perfonn their tactical support roles A Joint Memorandum of Understanding signed by the Assistant Secretary of Defense Intelligence the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence Commander USASA and Director National Security Agency was promulgated on 5 November 1974 This policy statement codified the basis for all future planning and conduct of peacetime utilization operations by Anny tactical SIGINT assets In June 1978 1 the name of the program was changed to reflect more dynamic wartime-oriented effort the acronym to be used infonnally was REDTRAIN Readiness Training for US Anny Intelligence Resources U General Walter T KeNin Jr oo VCSA obtained a briefing on 26 May 1978 The briefing outlined the beginning of the Multidiscipline Peacetime Utilization Program MDPUP In the past Peacetime Utilization had been restricted to SIGINT and for practical purposes excluded other intelligence disciplines and the Reserve Component General KeNin was very receptive to the concept for future MDPUP On 8 August 1978 the CofS HQ INSCOM designated elements within the headquarters as focal points for the devel opment of the program in their respective disciplines in regard to the primary functions of mission development technical support and live environment training These included CPAR Element SIGINT PU HUMINT Directorate DCSOPS HUMINT PU i ODCSITA PHOTINT 0B PU and ODCSCI CI SIGSEC OPSEC PU lDfGBP1 In recognition of INSCOM's role as DA's Executive Agent for peacetime utilization plans were initiated in June 1977 for the activation of a new unit with the resources to accomplish INSCOM responsibilities Called the Control Processing Analysis and Reporting CPAR Element the unit was organized on l November 1977 as Company E of the CONUS MI Group SIGINT EW fonnerly the I NSCOM Support Group at Fort Meade Personnel to fi 11 the unit came from the 376th ASA Company Control and Processing when the unit transferred to Fort Hood Texas as part of the CEWI Group activated in April 1978 - - REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON re- rlYk t L BY USAINSCOM FOi PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 lR 121 rt CONFIDENTIAL r l 129 HANDLE JPYIA COMIMT -CH NMELS ONLY - b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 8636 b 1 Per NSA jZ There were basically two ways to conduct peacetime utilization training in units that did not have access to a live signal environment The first was to bring the mission to the unit which was through the provision of tapes and technical working aids Many units were enjoying some success through this method The other way was to take the people to the mission which was tenned as Fon1ard Area Training FAT Between June 1977 and April 1978 90 FORSCOM personnel participated in FAT activities worldwide These included 11n uists who com rised a FAT team that deployed to -- In addition to the FAT program ere was a so Live nvironment Training LET for those tactical SIGINT EW units already in a fon1ard area Specialized Operational Training SOT applied to all units regardless of where they were located and was accomplished by sending individuals to a strategic site such as NSA or a Field Station for technical proficiency training in non-tactical environment U The CPAR augmented by the 99th AS Company C P USAR constituted the only existing organization which was manned and trained to implement SIGINT EW PU in the US Army Reserve However the CPAR unit lacked the staffing to undertake such an expanded mission unless augmented and the 99th Company could provide only limited and part time augmentation The provision of two PUP dedicated Reserve Officers would assure the technical and continuity bridge between the CPAR and the 99th AS Company in the implementation of USAR SIGINT EW PUP At the close of FY 1978 the prospects for approval of these two special Active Duty for Training ADT tours were uncertain U There were several major problem areas facing the Multidiscipline Peacetime Utilization Program at the end of the year These included a lack of adequate funding a lack of organizational framework to expand the program to non-SIGINT disciplines and a lack of linguist training facilities in CON US and overseas U AR 350-3 Peacetime Utilization of US Anny Tactical Signals Intelligence SIGINT Resources was published in September 1977 before FORSCOM and INSCOM could program funds through the nonnal budget cycle While acceptance of the program was good funds for live environment training had to come out of hide 11 It was hoped that future budget submi ssi ans by INS COM and FORSCOM would provide the monies needed to get the program on its feet However in September 1978 the Comptroller DCSOPS DA gave peacetime utilization a setback by disapproving funding for FY 1979 This meant a delay to the full implementation of the program U The SIGINT discipline enjoyed a great advantage in that CPAR was a dedicated organization to support peacetime utilization of tactical SIGINT resources The only step in supporting other disciplines was designating functional managers within INSCOM Finally there was the problem of providing language training for those EW Cryptologic personnel assigned to tactical units The problem was two-fold-how to maintain and enhance pure language proficiency and how to maintain and enhance the technical skills required in applying these skills to EW Cryptologic tasks and missions 122 130 It was difficult to provide an adequate training environment for linguists in CONUS Overseas there were not sufficient opportunities at fixed stations and deployment to border sites was expensive To overcome these deficiencies INSCOM proposed the fonnation of a Language Center 1n CONUS and a Forward Area Training and O erat 1ons Faci 11 t i 43 b 3 50 USC 3024 i b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 123 r 131 Freedom of Information Act Privacy Act' Deleted Page s Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption s b l b 3 Per NSA 50 USC 3024i PL 86-36 It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release D Infonnation pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and or the subject of your request D Information originated with another government agency It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you D Information originated with one or more government agencies We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview Upon completion of our coordination we will advise you of their decision D Other DELETED PAGE S NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE Page s 132-133 IAGP A-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 Crash of U-21A Aircraft Near Sinop U About 1405 hours Turkish local time 12052 on 20 January 1978 Anny 18011 an Anny U-21A aircraft Serial Number 66-18011 crashed on the southeast slope of a 31 740-foot mountain known as Kulluck Pig Mountain at an elevation of 3 606 feet The crash site was about 16 nautical miles from the Sinop Arn Y Airfield Three military personnel passengers and a crew of two were on board and al 1 were killed on impact of the aircraft which itself was destroyed by impact damage and post-crash fire U The aircraft was on a routine flight from Istanbul to Sinop Turkey with passengers and mail The aircraft departed Istanbul Yesilkoy Airport at 1225 on an Instrument Flight Rules IFR flight to Sinop At 1344 the flight was released from IFR to Visual Meteorological Conditions VMC Between 1355 and 1400 the crew contacted the Sinop Military Police Station on FM radio and received current weather at Sinop and gave estimated time of arrival of 1420 hours The aircraft crashed within an estimated five minutes after their last radio contact with no further radio calls received The Collateral Investigating Board detennined that the probable cause of the accident was material failure of the No 2 right engine Contributing to the accident was the possible icing conditions and instrument meteorological conditions IMC known to have existed at lower altitudes An additional contributing fact was a suspected premature descent into or through the IMC using the aircraft's weather radar to determine range to the Sinop Anny Airfield 46 126 - r r 134 FOOTNOTES - CHAPTER VI OPERATIOOAL ACTIVITIES b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 1 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 72-73 and Vol II S-CCO NOFORN LIMDIS Tab 16 2 Ibid Vol II S-CCO NOFORN LIMDIS Tab 27 3 Affif DCSS HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO App J thru N Q 4 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 73-74 5 AHR ITAC FY78 Annex A Tab A 1978 USAINSCOM CoRITlanders Conference PreConference Packet S p 0-11 6 AHR FS Berlin FY78 Vol II TSC p 31 7 Black Book Item IAOPS-SE-0 HQ INSCOM 17 Jul 78 subj Exploitation of ' - - - - - - - - - - _ _ SC 8 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 77 and Vol II S-CCO NOFORN LIMDIS Tab 24 9 Ibid Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 198 10 TliTcf p 190 11 AHR - DCSTEL HQ INSCOM FY78 C 1 pp 18-19 1978 USAINSCOM CoRITlanders Conference PreConference Packet 5 p F-8 F-9 12 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 131-134 13 Interview Mr Maahs ODCSOPS with Mr Gilbert History Office Jun 79 re Update of OF Nets 14 OPS CHATTER OCSOPS HQ INSCOM 5 Au9 78 S-CCO NOFORN p 12 15 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 1 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN 1 pp 144-145 16 AHR DCSS HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO pp 15-16 17 Interview Mr J J Keith ODCSOPS HQ INSCOM with Mr Gilbert History Office 27 Jun 79 i Ann Hist Review INSCOM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMOIS pp 125-126 18 AHR OCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 120 OPS CHATTER DCSOPS HQ INSCOM 5 Apr 78 S-CCO NOFORN 1 p 13 19 AHR 1 DCSLOG HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO pp 26-31 AHR OCSS HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO Annex E 20 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 1 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 110-116 21 Ibid pp 116-119 22 T6Ta pp 134-136 23 Tbfcf pp 210-211 24 Tiiicf p 41 TRACER R UND Final Report - Executive Summary HQ INSCOM l 'Jun 78 pp 1-4 6-10 25 Interview Mr J D Lytle ODCSCI HQ INSCOM with Mr Gilbert History Office 26 Jun 78 26 Interview Mr Gordon Doodyo ODCSCI HQ INSCOM with Mr Gilbert History Office 26 Jun 78 _ 27 AHR DCSCI HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I pp 12-13 28 AHR FS I IF Y78 TSC NOFORN WNINTEL pp 261-262 29 Qtrly Prag Rev HQ INSCOM 4th Qtr FY78 Suppl SC p 4 30 AHR JFY78 TSC NOFORN WNINTEL pp 258-259 AHR OCSOPS HQ I O FY78 ol I TS_ CCO NOFORN pp 84-85 Ann Hi st Rev INS COM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMDIS p 140 127 -- 135 CONFIDENTIALHREL TO USA b 3 Per DIA i t V 31 AHR CSOC FS San Antonio FY78 1 Vol I TSC NOFORN pp 51-52 Ann Hist Rev INSCOM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMDIS o pp 143-144 32 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 84-85 33 AHR FS Homestead FY78 SC pp 31-32 34 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 125-129 and Vol III SC NOFORN Tabs 53 54 57 iLI ---------------------___J 38 Travis' Trophy Nominee 470th MI Gp 22 Mar 78 SC p 12 39 AHR 470th MI Gp FY78 TSC NOFORN Chap II p land App T 40 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN 1 p 95 AHR 470th MI Gp FY78 TSC NOFORN Chap II pp 19-21 41 AHR 470th MI Gp FY78 TSC NOFORN Chap II pp 3-4 Interview Mr James P Cowgill Chief Imagery Div ODCSOPS HQ INSCOM with Mr Gilbert History Office Nov 78 S NOFORN 42 AHR ITAC FY78 App E and Annexes F G 43 Msg fm CDRINSCOM to CINCUSAREUR 20 Apr 78 subj Peacetime Utilization of Anny Tactical SIGINT Resources C OPS CHATTER DCSOPS HQ INSCOM 5 Apr 78 S-CCO NOFORN pp 1-2 Fact Sheet IAOPS-PTR 5 Sep 78 subj Peacetime Utilization Msg fm CDRINSCOM to CDRFORSCOM others DTG 2021002 Jun 78 subj USA Multidiscipline Peacetime Utilization Program MDPUP AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 224 i Ann Hist Rev INSCOM FY77 TSC NOFORN LIMDIS pp 147-148 Ltr fm CDRINSCOM to Chief Anny Reserve undtd subj Request for Two Special ADT Tours of 2 Years Each 44 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN p 75 and Vol II S-CCO NOFORN LIMDIS Tabs 17 18 45 AHR DCSLOG HQ INSCOM FY78 S-CCO Chap III Msg fm CDRINSCOM to b 3 P L 86-36 b 1 Per NSA 46 AHR DCSOPS HQ INSCOM FY78 Vol I TS-CCO NOFORN pp 204-206 Report on Fatal Crash of TUSLOG Det 4 U-21A CONFIDENTIAL h'REL TO USA FVEY 128 136 ' ' CONADENTIAl APPENDIX A USA INSCOM ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE As of 30 September 1978 UIC Location Unit Designation WOOYAA HEA X UARTERS US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMMD Hq US Anny Intelligence and Security Co11111and Fort W31ZAA Meade WOOOAA WOOlAA ta w '1 W002AA WOlCAA WOlDAA WOlEAA WOlHAA WOlKAA W02BAA W02RAA WODRAA WOK LAA WlUJAA W372AA WJAGAA WJBRAA WJCCAA WJNBAA WJNSAA WJQNAA WJRAAA W3YDAA W31UAA US Anny Garrison Arlington Hall Station USA INSCOM C JiUS Military Intelligence Group SIGINT EW US Anny Element National Security Agency USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Fort Dix USA INSCOM Personnel Detactwnent Fort Jackson USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Fort Leonard Wood US Anny Garrison Vint Hill Fanns Station US Anny Field Station Homestead US Anny Field Station Okinawa US Anny Field Station Berlin US Anny Field Station Sinop Classified Unit US Anny A hinistrative Survey Detachment US Anny Foreign Area Officers Detachment US Anny Field Station Augsburg US Anny Field Station Misawa USA INSCOM Data Systems Activity US Anny Technical Support Activity USA INSCOM Detachment Hawaii US Anny Cryptologic Support Group USA INSCOM Liaison Detachment Pacific US Anny Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center US Anny Field Station San Antonio Arlington Hall Station Arlington Virginia Fort George G Meade Maryl and Arlington Virginia Fort George G Meade Maryland Fort George G Meade Maryland Fort Dix New Jersey Fort Jackson South Caro1i na Fort Leonard Wood Missouri Warrenton Virginia Homestead Air Force Base Homestead Florida Sobe Okinawa Japan Berlin Gennany Sinop Turkey Fort George G Meade Maryland Fort George G Meade Maryland Fort George G Meade Maryl and Augsburg Gennany Misawa Japan Arlington Hall Station Arlington Virginia Arlington Hall Station Arlington Virginia Fort Shafter Hawaii Heidelberg Germany Fort Shafter Hawaii Arlington H all Station Arlington Virginia San Antonio Texas 129 CONRDENTIAl REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON A- PsliL -cit BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR o o CONABENllAt APPENDIX A UIC W32BAA W35GAA W36SAA W39CAA W318AA W319AA WBU6AA WBU699 WOOSAA W009AA - J - 1-- w WOlAAA WOlBAA r- '-' W3S2AA W32AAA WBU7AA WBU799 WGNTAA WBVNAA WBVHAA WBVKM WBVLAA WBWKM WBWVAA Location Unit Designation HEAIX UARTERS o US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COr-tlAND US Anny Central Security Facility USA INSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity USA INSCOM Engineering and Maintenance Assistance Activity US Anny Special Operations Detachment USA INSCOM Ft Meade Hq Support Detachment US Army Operational Group 902d Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 902d Military Intelligence Group USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Pentagon USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Ft Houston USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Batta 1ion Pres i dfo of San Francisco USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Defense Nuclear Agency USA INSCOM Security Support Detachment Ft Meade USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Ft Meade 66th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 66th Military Intelligence Group 18th Military Intelligence Battalion 5th Military Intelligence Company HHC 165th Military Intelligence Battalion HHC 511th Military Intelligence Battalion HHC 527th Military Intelligence Battalion 430th Military Intelligence Detachment 766th Military Intelligence Detacflnent Fort George G Meade Maryland Arlington Hall Station Arlington Virginia Arlington Hall Station Arlington Virginia Fort George G Meade Maryland Fort George G Meade Maryl and Fort George 6 Meade Maryland Fort George 6 Meade Maryland Fort George G Meade Maryl and Pentagon Washington D C Fort Sam Houston Texas Presidio of San Francisco California Alexandria Virginia Fort George G Meade Maryl and Fort George G Meade Maryland Munich Gemany Muni ch Ge nnany Munich Gennany Muni ch Gennany Frankfurt Gennany Nurnberg Furth Gennany Kaiserslautern Gennany Munich Gennany Berlin Gennany 130 - cONABENTIAt REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON -tfl tL -c I Y' BY USAINSCOM FOTIPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR o o CONFIDENTIAl APPENDIX A UIC WBU8AA WBU899 W3CUAA WBU9AA WBU999 WH6AAA WH6A99 WBWFAA WBWF99 i- w c c W33YAA W3F1AA WDLPAA WEDVAA WGQ4AA W4ASAA WGTX90 Unit Designation Location HEAIX UARTERS US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY C0 '1AND 470th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 470th Military Intelligence Group USA INSCOM Detachment Southern Conmand 500th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 500th Military Intelligence Group HHC 501st Military I teJligence Group Augmentation 501st MiJitary Intelligence Group 209th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation 209th Military Intelligence Detachment USASA Security Detachment Korea US AnllY Field Station Korea 146th ASA Company Aviation Forward 332d ASA Company Operations Forward 704th Military Intelligence Detachment US AnllY Combined Research Detachment 641st Military Intelligence Detachment Collection Augmentation Carrier 131 CONFIDENTIAl' Fort lwador Canal Zone Fort Amador Canal Zone Fort Plnador Canal Zone Camp Zama Japan Camp Zama Japan Yongsan Korea Yongsan Korea Yongsan Korea Yongsan Korea Uijongbu Korea Pyong Taek Korea Taegu Korea Pyong Taek Korea Seoul Korea Yongsan Korea Fort George G Meade Maryland REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 1 3 4 z _ L -CI 'tr BY USAlNSCC 1 OliPA A 1 ni FuLl - _ 1 h iJ J J tR CONFIDENTIAL - APPENDIX B TOE UNITS As of 30 September 1978 WBU7 WBUB WBU9 WH6A WBU6 WGNT WBVH WBVK WBVL WBVN WDLP WEDV WBWF WBWK WGQ4 WBWV 66th Military Intelligence Group 470th Military Intelligence Group 500th Military Intelligence Group Hq Hq Ccrnpany 501st Military Intelligence Group 902d Military Intelligence Group 18th Military Intelligence Battalion Hq Hq Company 165th Military Intelligence Battalion Hq Hq Company 511th Military Intelligence Battalion Hq Hq Company 527th Military Intelligence Battalion 5th Military Intelligence Company 146th Anny Security Agency Company Aviation Forward 332d Anny Security Agency Company Operations Forward 209th Military Intelligence Detachment 430th Military Intelligence Detachment 704th Military Intelligence Detachment 766th Military Intelligence Detachment REGRADI r L iCLASSlFIED ON i l'f114 L D-c' If BY VSAINSCOM FOIIPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR 132 CONFIDENTIAL 140 1 CONFIDENTIAL - APPENDIX C CHANGES IN STATUS OF TOE UNITS ACTIVATED Unit Eff Date Authority WBWF 209th Military Intelligence Detachment WH6A HHC 501st Military Intelligence Group l Jan 78 l Jan 78 PO 62-1 1 26 Aug 77 PO 62-1 26 Aug 77 Unit Eff Date Authority 66th Military Intelligence Group From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 470th Military Intelligence Group From USAINTA To HQ INS COM l Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 500th Military Intelligence Group From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 525th Military Intelligence Group From USAINTA To HQ INS COM l Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 901st Military Intelligence Detacmnent From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 REASSIGNED INACTIVATED Unit Eff Date WBVE HHC 502d Military Intelligence Battalion Companies A B C 502d Military Intelligence Battalion WBUY HHC 525th Military Intelligence Group WCWN 901 s t Military Intelligence Detachment Authority 1 Jan 78 PO 73-3 7 Oct 77 l Jan 78 1 Jan 78 Jan 78 PO 17-1 22 Mar 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 All Pennanent Orders are from HQ INSCOM 133 CONAOENTIAL r- ' 141 I REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON Fl 'k ' 1GBP IYBY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200 IR CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX D TOA UNITS As of 30 September 1978 woov WOOD WOOl W002 woos W009 WOlA WOlB WOlC WOlD WOlE WOlH WOlK W02B W02R WODR WOKL WlU3 W31 U W31Z W32A W328 W33Y W35G W36S W39C W318 W319 W372 WJAG W3BR W3CC W3CU W3Fl WJNB W3NS W3QN W3RA - W3S2 W3YD Headquarters US Army Intelligence and Security Connand US Anny Garrison Arlington Hall Station USA INSCOM CONUS Military Intelligence Group SIGINT EW US Army Element National Security Agency USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Pentagon USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Ft Houston USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Presidio of San Francisco USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Defense Nuclear Agency USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Ft Dix USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Ft Jackson USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Ft Leonard Wood US Army Garrison Vint Hill Fanns Station US Army Field Station Homestead US Army Field Station Okinawa US Anny Field Station Berlin US Army Field Station Sinop Classified Unit US Anny Administrative Survey Detachment US Army Field Station San Antonio Headquarters US Army Intelligence and Security Connand Ft Meade USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Ft Meade US Anny Central Security Facility USASA Security Detachment Korea USA INSCOM Finance and Accounting Activity USA INSCOM Engineering and Maintenance Assistance Activity US Anny Special Operations Detachment USA INSCOM Ft Meade Hq Support Detachment US Army Operational Group US Army Foreign Area Officers Detachment US Anny Field Station Augsburg US Anny Field Station Misawa USA INSCOM Data Systems Activity USA INSCOM Detachment Southern Connand US Anny Field Station Korea US Army Technical Support Activity USA INSCOM Detachment Hawaii US Anny Cryptologic Support Group USA INSCOM Liaison Detachment Pacific USA INSCOM Security Support Detachment Ft Meade US Army Intelligence Threat and Analysis Center 134 CONFIDENTIAL 'f 142 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON L I BY USAINSCOM FOT PA Auth Para 4-1 v DOD 5200 1 R CONFIDENTIAl 1 APPENDIX D W4AS WBU699 WBU799 WBU899 WBU999 WBWF99 WH6A99 WGTX90 US Aney Coni ined Research Detachment Augmentation 902d Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 66th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 470th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 500th Military Intelligence Group Augmentation 209th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation 501st Military Intelligence Group 641st Military Intelligence Detachment Collection Augmentation Carrier 135 REGRA PED UNCLASSIFIED CONADENTIAL ' 143 I ON 5s r p _ L r9C' if BY USAfNSCOM FOIIPA Auth Para 4 -l J DOD 5200 IR CONflBENTIAl APPENDIX E CHANGES IN STATUS OF TOA UNITS ORGANIZED Eff Date WH6A99 Augmentation 501st Military Intelligence Group WBWF99 Augmentation 209th Military Intelligence Detachment W4ASAA US Anr Y Combined Research Detachment WGTX90 641st Military Intelligence Detachment Collection Augmentation Carrier Authority 1 Jan 78 PO 62-1 26 Aug 77 1 Jan 78 1 Nov 77 PO 62-1 26 Aug 77 PO 73-3 7 Oct 77 16 Sep 78 PO 60-1 1 14 Sep 78 REASSIGNED Unit Eff Date US ArrllY Administrative Survey Detachment From USAINTA To HQ INS COM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 Authority US Anny Operational Security Group From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM From HQ INSCOM To 902d Military Intelligence Group 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 1 Jan 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 US Anny Central Security Facility Fran USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 US Anny Special Operations Detachment From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 US ArrllY Intelligence Agency Hq Support Detachment From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 US Anny Operational Group Fran USAINTA To HQ INSCOM 1 Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 Classified Unit From USAINTA To HQ INSCOM l Oct 77 PO 70-3 27 Sep 77 136 CONFIOENTIAl r' 144 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON '6 tffl1 L O g BY USAINSCOM FOT PA Auth Para 4-10' 2 DOD 5200 lR - CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX E REASSIGNED Continued Unit Eff Date Authority us Anny Field Station Korea From 501st MI Group Augmentation Carrier To 501st MI Group 1 Jan 78 PO 62-1 26 Aug 77 US Anny Security Agency Security Detachment Korea From 209th MI Detachment Augmentation Carrier To 209th MI Detachment 1 Jan 78 PO 62-1 o 26 Aug 77 USA INSCOM Security Support Detachment Ft Meade From HQ INSCOM To 902d MI Group 1 Jan 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Defense Nuclear Agency From HQ INSCOM To 902d MI Group 1 Jan 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Pentagon From HQ INSCOM To 902d MI Group 1 Jan 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 US Anny Combined Research Detachment From 501st MI Group Augmentation Carrier To 501st MI Group 1 Jan 78 PO 73-3 7 Oct 77 USA INSCOM Detachment Hawaii From US Anny Signal Securit y Activity To HQ INSCOM 1 Nov 77 PO 82-1 7 Nov 77 137 CONFIDENTIAL 145 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON JPY r- f'IZ- L Cl - BY USAINS1n 1 ff f i Auth Par i 4-1 G UrnJ i 2'JO l R ------------------ CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX E REDESIGNATED Designation Eff Date Old US Anny Intelligence Agency New Headquarters US Anny Intelligence and Security Coninand Fort Meade l Oct 77 PO 69-1 26 Sep 77 Old US Anny Intelligence Agency Headquarters Support Detachment 1 Oct 77 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Coninand Ft Meade Hq Support Detachment PO 85-1 o 16 Nov 77 Old US Anny Intelligence and Security Corrmand Liaison Detachment US Anny Europe 1 Oct 77 New US Anny Cryptologic Support Group PO 85-1 16 Nov 77 Old US Aney Security Detachment Hawaii l Nov 77 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Conwnand Detachment Hawaii Old US Anny Intelligence and Security Cormiand Support Group 1 Nov 77 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Command CONUS Military Intelligence Group SIGINT EW Old US Anny Intelligence and Security Corrmand Liaison Detachment TRADOC 1 Jan 78 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Corrmand Counterintelligence Detachment Defense Nuclear Agency - Authority PO 82-1 7 Nov 77 PO 90-3 5 Dec 77 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 Old US Aney Signal Security Activity 1 Jan 78 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Corrmand Security Support Detachment Ft Meade PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 Old US Anny Security Detachment-Region I 1 Jan 78 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Command Counterintelligence Detachment Pentagon PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 Old US Anny Security Detachment-Region III 1 Jan 78 New US Aney Intelligence and Security Corrmand Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Ft Houston PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 138 CONFIDENTIAL I 146 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON i rrt'ftll-- 9--01 BY USAINSCOM r-OVPA Auth Par i 4-i u UOD 5200 JR CONADENTIAL APPENDIX E REDESIGNATED Continued Designation Eff Date Authority Old US Army Security Detachment-Region IV l Jan 78 New US Anny Intelligence and Security Co11111and Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Presidi o of San Francisco PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 Old US Anny Operational Securizy Group 1 Jan 78 New US Anny Intelligence and Securicy Corrmand Counterintelligence and Signal Security Support Battalion Ft Meade PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 Old US Army Intelligence Threat Analysis Detachment New US Anl Y Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center 1 Jan 78 PO 15-2 20 Mar 78 TRANSFERRED Unit Eff Date US Army Security Agency Test and Evaluation Center TRANSFERRED from HQ INSCOM to DARCOM 1 Oct 77 Authority PO 68-1 23 Sep 77 RELOCATED Unit Eff Date Authority USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Defense Nuclear Agency Ft Monroe Va RELOCATED to Ft George G Meade Md l Jan 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 USA INSCOM Security Support Detachment Ft Meade Warrenton Va RELOCATED to Ft George 6 Meade Md 1 Jan 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 US Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center Washington DC RELOCATED to Arlington Hall Station Arlington Va 1 Jan 78 PO 15-2 20 Mar 78 139 CONFIDENTIAL - 147 REGRADED UNCLASSlFlED ON b' rtf Z- L- 9-C I BY USA1N COM FOI PA A n h P tr i 1 lX D 5200 1 R - CONflDENTIAl APPENDIX E DISCONTINUED Unit W3PU W3TL W3YS W003 woox WH6A90 WBWF90 WBUY99 WlWN WBVE99 WCWN99 Eff Date USA INS COM L1ai son Detachment FORS COM l Jan US Arn y Intelligence Support Detachment 1 Jan US Arn y Intelligence Operations Support Detachment l Jan USA INSCOM Liaison Detachment NSA CSS 30 Apr US Arn y Imagery Interpretation Center 1 Jan HHC 1 501st Military Intelligence Group Augmentation Carrier l Jan 209th Military Intelligence Detachment Augmentation Carrier 1 Jan Augmentation 525th Military Intelligence Group 1 Jan USA INSCOM Intelligence Group 1 Jan Augmentation 502d Military Intelligence Battalion l Jan Augmentation 901st Military Detachment l Jan Authority 78 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 PO 15-2 20 Mar 78 78 78 78 PO 15-2 20 Mar 78 PO 36-1 13 Jun 78 PO 15-2 20 Mar 78 78 PO 62-1 26 Aug 77 78 PO 62-1 26 Aug 77 78 78 PO 12-1 24 Feb 78 PO 15-2 20 Mar 78 78 78 PO 73-3 7 Oct 77 PO 12-1 1 24 Feb 78 140 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENllAI 148 oN ' rri -' 'de rt BY USAINSCOM FO PA Auth f'ara - 02 DCJ 5200 lR o - CONABENTIAL APPENDIX F USA INSCOM PERS JiNEL STRENGTH BY UNIT As of 30 Septenner 1978 Unit i-o Auth OFF HQ US Anl Y Intelligence and Security 134 Conlnand INSCOM HQ US Anny Intelligence and Security 43 Conmand Fort Meade USA INSCOM Ft Meade Hq Support De5 tachment 15 USAG Arlington Hall Station US A l Y Intelligence and Threat 91 Analysis Center USA INSCOM COtms Military Intelligence 128 Group SIGINT EW 16 USA Element NSA 10 USA Central Security Facility 9 USA Special Operations Detachment 38 USA Administrative Survey Detachment 1 Classified Unit WOKL 45 USA Operati ona1 Group 1 USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Ft Dix USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Ft 1 Jacksm USA INSCOM Personnel Detachment Ft 1 Leonard Wood 16 USAG Vint Hill Fanns Station 1 USA Field Station Homestead 13 USA Field Station San Antonio 3 USA INSCOM Data Systems Activity USA INSCOM Finance and Accounting 1 Activity Asgd WO Auth Asgd Auth ENL Asgd 00 CIV MIL TOTAL Auth Asgd Auth Asgd 95 13 7 81 64 228 166 253 210 37 9 11 52 54 104 102 98 90 4 14 1 2 1 2 6 179 13 204 12 196 18 220 12 54 14 43 75 25 17 126 104 242 196 185 1 63 107 13 3 4 38 1 39 1 38 0 2 12 27 39 0 0 13 0 17 0 1008 0 24 29 37 5 31 28 821 0 7 15 42 6 26 31 1174 16 36 50 102 6 89 29 967 13 10 29 106 7 82 32 11 0 73 6 271 10 3 0 4 0 95 6 260 9 4 0 1 0 0 30 35 31 36 0 0 1 14 1 11 7 0 26 139 18 28 130 9 442 344 56 27 157 19 462 58 29 144 0 7 1 0 0 0 6 2 361 65 0 92 0 5 44 0 3 35 1 0 0 19 15 20 16 19 15 0 10 26 0 2 141 CONABENTIAL 54 10 P 1_ lV t 'd _ CLASSIHED O' 'i 15 r IZ tL tk BY TJS ll't co ti FOYPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 200 IR 0 77 - - CONAOENTIAL' APPENDIX F OFF Auth Asgd Unit -t t i S Q USA INSCOM Engineering and Maintenance Assistance Activity 902d Military Intelligence Group w Augmentation USA INSa M Counterintelligence and SIGSEC Support Battalion Ft Meade USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and SIGSEC Support Battalion Presidio of San Francisco USA INSCOM Counterintelligence and SIGSEC Support Battalion Ft Houston USA INSCOM Counterintelligence Detachment Pentagon USA INSCOM Coll1terintelligence Detachment Defense Nuclear Agency USA INSCOM Security Support Detachment Ft Meade 641st Military Intelligence Detachment Collection Aug Carrier SUBTOTAL cotms 470th Military Intelligence Group w Augmentation USA INSCCJ 1 Detachment Southern Conmand SUBTOTAL CARIBBEAN WO Auth Asgd Auth ENL Asgd MIL TOTAL Auth Asgd Auth IJf CIV Asgd 2 2 2 2 66 65 70 69 10 7 11 9 4 4 19 13 34 26 9 9 36 25 35 27 87 74 158 126 6 4 22 13 24 21 45 51 91 85 2 1 22 16 16 14 59 47 97 77 1 1 10 8 16 12 46 36 72 56 0 0 3 3 5 4 7 8 15 15 2 2 21 16 16 20 42 39 79 75 31 21 19 0 15 0 39 0 73 0 0 0 718 559 285 242 2744 2337 3747 3138 1197 1073 11 13 2 4 41 75 54 92 4 6 2 0 36 38 0 2 4 77 75 92 92 4 6 13 13 Assigned included within 470th MI Group total REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED 142 CONADENTIAL 1 rtf1Z 1L k BY USAINSC0 1 FOl PA ON Auth Para 4-10 2 DOD 5200 lR - - CONflBENlW ' APPENDIX F OFF Unit i- CJ' USA Cryptologic Support Group USA Field Station Berlin USA Field Station Augsburg 66th Military Intelligence Group w Augmentation 5th Military Intelligence Company 18th Military Intelligence Battalion 165th Military Intelligence Battalion 511th Military Intelligence Battalion 430th Military Intelligence Detactlnent 527th Military Intelligence Battalion 766th Military Intelligence Detachment USA Field Station Sinop SUBTOTAL EUROPE USA INSCOM Detachment Hawaii USA INSCOM Liaison Detachment Pacific USA Field Station Okinawa USA Field Station Misawa 500th Military Intelligence Group w Augmentation 501st Military Intelligence Group w Augmentation 209th Military Intelligence Detach ment USA Combined Research Detachment USA Field Station Korea USASA Security Detachment Korea WO ENL Asgd Auth Asgd Auth Asgd Auth 2 31 67 2 32 64 4 19 33 3 19 35 11 755 1638 29 4 33 4 12 5 17 14 3 8 4 5 14 5 2 4 169 46 101 15 12 12 7 16 11 3 11 6 6 15 6 2 3 207 220 119 6 1 22 3 7 0 21 3 2 0 5 1 2 0 6 1 667 140 18 14 16 14 23 25 3 7 6 12 l 6 3 14 l 5 1 10 9 9 14 10 11 8 0 73 73 30 71 17 73 IJf CIV MIL TOTAL Auth Asgd Auth Asgd 0 770 1510 805 1738 16 821 1609 0 9 12 11 180 30 117 62 62 29 64 29 76 209 53 122 227 37 137 88 88 77 82 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 137 0 2 11 116 3057 2940 17 59 87 24 93 55 81 38 96 3383 3276 8 159 34 1 694 144 35 0 661 163 0 0 0 2 0 0 86 75 120 103 57 56 6 153 139 179 170 l 1 6 2 9 0 99 75 8 8 9 87 13 261 9 0 0 238 111 15 285 0 8 26 26 0 0 634 265 8 0 1 0 143 CDNFIDENT1Al 1 Rrnr DED UNCLASSIFIED C ' '1 'b r - f ftLtk l i I' Ul o p W ' AINSr'OM Fl I u 1- --rrolR 1 p_ ar i o- 10 '_ l 'UiJ i Uv ' nL1 1 0 o - CONADENTIAL APPENDIX F Unit 146th Anny Security Agency Coq any 332d Anny Security Agency Co111 any Operations 704th Military Intelligence Detachment SUBTOTAL PACIFIC USA Technical Support Activity Worldwide GRAND TOTAL - c n ro OFF WO Asgd Auth ENL Asgd 14 15 126 111 145 5 3 2 241 226 2 2 6 8 75 66 113 105 64 Auth Asgd Auth 5 4 7 7 1058 -- 2 2 899 --472 - 71 1894 1765 2 435 -- 35 12 7807 7129 --- -- MIL TOTAL Auth Asgd Auth CIV Asgd 130 0 0 251 233 0 0 83 76 0 0 61 60 2071 1941 44 16 9337 8463 -- - -- IJf 4 4 1417 1200 -- -- Does not include Wage Board and Foreign Nationals FN The 30 Sep 78 totals for Wage Board worldwide was 164 for FN direct hire 101 and for FN indirect hire 392 144 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL i- I ON M1UL- 9D1V BY USAINSCC 1 F01 PA Auth Para 4-102 00D 5200 l R APPENDIX G USA INSCOM KEY PERSONNEL Position Name Oates Served COMMANDING GENERAL MG Wi 111am I Ro lya l Sep 75 - Present DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL INTELLIGENCE BG James E Freeze l Sep 75 - Present DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL 1 SECURITY AND PRODUCTION BG John A Smith Jr 15 May 78 - Present COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR CSM Lee K Stikeleather 30 Nov 72 - Present CHIEF OF STAFF COL John M carr l Aug 77 - Present CHIEF OF STAFF FGGM COL Albert W Hamel l Oct 77 - 16 Jan 78 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF LTC Ck nald York COL Rodney K Roberts 21 Aug 78 - Present 15 Oct 7 6 - 20 Aug 78 ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF FGGM COL Albert W Hamel 16 Jan 78 - 31 Jul 78 SECRETARY OF THE MAJ John H MAJ Dale E MAJ Paul D Mar 78 - 7 Jul 78 17 Jan 77 - l Mar 78 GENERAL STAFF Prokopowicz Duncan Sutton 7 Jul 78 - Present 1 SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL STAFF FGGM lLT R G Hiler MAJ R S Green l Apr 78 - 11 Aug 78 16 Jan 78 - l Apr 78 INSPECTOR GENERAL COL Robert A Hyatt l Sep 77 - Present STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE LTC Raymond K Wicker l Sep 75 - Present 145 ' 153 - APPENDIX G Position Name Dates Served COMMAND CHAPLAIN COL Richard W Mansur l Apr 78 - Present STAFF ADVISOR FOR SCIENTIFIC AND CRYPTO AFFAIRS Mr Ed#in A Speakman 12 Aug 68 - Present SPECIAL DISBURSING OFFICER Mr Autmer Ackley 10 Jul 78 - Present CHIEF PLANS PROGRAM AND ANALYSIS COL Alan Stem COL James W Shufelt 10 Jul 78 - Present 1 Aug 77 - l O Jul 78 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF PERSONNEL COL Richard E Jewett 12 Jul 77 - Present DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF SECURITY COL William B Holden 10 Jun 74 - 31 Oct 77 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF OPERATIONS Mr Ji111111e B Garrett Acting COL John L Heiss III COL Francis X Lillis 18 Sep 78 - Present 3 Jan 78 - 18 Sep 78 l Nov 76 - 3 Jan 78 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF LOGISTICS COL Harold D Yawberg LTC Charles E DeShields Acting COL J1nvnie M Chaffin 14 Jul 78 - Present 25 May 78 - 13 Jul 78 1 Jun 73 - 24 May 78 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COL Lawrence H Whitt COL CMyer K Mitchum 1 Feb 78 - Present l Dec 76 - 1 Feb 78 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF SYSTEMS Mr George A Harvey Jr Acting 3 Jan 78 - Present DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE COL Richard L Cary Mr William Stefen LTC Ji ITII Y R Harris e 18 Sep 78 - Present 30 Jun 78 - 18 Sep 78 31 Aug 77 - 30 Jun 78 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF INTELLIGENCE AND THREAT ANALYSIS COL A1bert F P Jones 3 Oct 77 - Present LTC Robert R Sieck Acting l Mar 77 - 3 Oct 77 146 154 APPENDIX G Position Name Dates Served DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF TELECOMMUNICATIONS COL Clarence A Trowbridge DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING COL Daniel Moore Jr 28 Jun 77 - Present 1 Aug 76 - Present Unit Commander HQ US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FORT MEADE BG James E Freeze 29 Aug 77 - Present 66TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Charles F Scanlon COL Nonnan S Wells 2 Aug 78 - Present Aug 76 - 2 Aug 78 470TH MILITA INTELLIGENCE GROUP LTC Thomas N Sherburne 9 Jun 77 - Present SOOTH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Roy M Strom COL Howard M Gabbert 24 Jul 78 - Present 16 May 75 - 14 Jul 78 HHC 501ST MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Julius Parker Jr 26 Jul 77 - Present HHC 525TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP LTC Russell E Cooley 9020 MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP 6 Jul 77 - 1 Jan 78 4 Aug 77 - Present COL Richard E Littlefield USA INSCOM CONUS MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP SIGINT EW COL Joseph D Howard USA INSCOM INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL Chester L Arnzen 13 Jul 76 - Present 1 Aug 77 - 1 Jan 78 US ARMY OPERAHONAL GROUP COL Frederick T Barrett 13 Sep 76 - Present US ARMY CRYPTOLOGIC SUPPORT GROUP LTC Sigmu d J Haber 1 Oct 77 - Present 147 --------11111111 155 APPENDIX G Unit Conrnander Dates Served US ARMY FIELD STATION AUGSBURG COL James W Hunt COL ThClllas J Flynn 23 Jun 78 - Present 19 Jun 76 - 23 Jun 78 US ARMY FIELD STATION BERLIN COL Charles B Eichelberger COL Dallas C Brown Jr 6 Jun 78 - Present 4 Aug 77 - 6 Jun 78 US ARMY FIELD STATION HOMESTEAD CPT Bruce Jackson 1 Jul 75 - Present US ARMY FIELD STATION KOREA LTC William 8 Guild MAJ Donald J Seaborn LTC Michael M Schneider 26 Jun 78 - Present 26 May 78 - 26 Jun 78 7 Jun 77 - 26 May 78 US ARMY FIELD STATION MISAWA LTC Thomas J Hogan 15 Jul 77 - Present US ARMY FIELD STATION OKINAWA COL Charles E Schmidt 25 Aug 77 - Present US ARMY FIELD STATION SAN ANTONIO LTC Donald W Steiger LTC Jack H Holbrook 15 Mar 78 - Present 9 Jul 76 - 14 Mar 78 US ARMY FIELD STATIOO SINOP COL James D Neighbors COL James D Canfield 31 Aug 78 - Present 17 Sep 77 - 30 Aug 78 18TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Roy J Davis LTC Michael E Grant 30 Aug 76 - 2 Aug 78 2 Aug 78 - Present HHC 165TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Bruce H Davis 3 Jan 77 - Present HHC 511TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Arthur L Henderson MAJ Carl M Jordan Acting LTC Anthony J Gallo Jr 13 Jul 78 - Present 17 Jun 78 - 13 Jul 78 Jan 77 - 17 Jun 78 148 - 156 APPENDIX G Dates Served Unit Conmander HHC 527TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC Nicholas F Quintarelli LTC Nelson B Bond 28 Jun 78 - Present 2 Feb 77 - 28 Jun 78 USA INSCOM COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SIGNAL SECURITY SUPPORT BATTALION FT MEADE MAJ William J Foley MAJ Francis J Adamouski LTC Donald P Press 18 Sep 78 - Present 19 Aug 78 - 18 Sep 78 1 Oct 76 - 19 Aug 78 USA INSCOM COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SIGNAL SECURITY SUPPORT BATTALION FT SAM HOUSTON LTC Robert M Weikle 1 Jan 78 - Present USA INSCOM COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SIGNAL SECURITY SUPPORT BATTALION PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO LTC Russell E Cooley 1 Jan 78 - Present 5TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT Alveme C Mueller 1 Oct 77 - Present 146TH ARMY SECURITY AGENCY COMPANY AVN FWD MAJ Harry E Cryblskey MAJ James M Coughlin 1 Dec 77 - Present 31 Mar 77 - 1 Dec 77 332D ARMY SECURITY AGENCY COMPANY OPERATIONS FWD CPT Danny W Braudrick CPT Lane E Thames CPT Eric W Hawkins 8 Jun 78 - Present 5 Dec 77 - 8 Jun 78 15 May 77 - 5 Dec 77 209TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT MAJ Howard W Moore Jr LTC William R Gegner May 78 - Present Oct 77 - May 78 430TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC Robert G Lunt 24 Jun 77 - Present 704TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT CPT Mark L Kagle CPT William T Brown III 15 Jul 78 - Present 1 Oct 77 - 15 Jul 78 766TH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC James L Ford 1 Oct 77 - Present 149 - 15' APPENDIX G Un 1t Co1m1an de r Dates Served 901ST MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETAOiMENT LTC Bruce A Phinney 27 Jan 77 - 30 Sep 77 USA INSCOM CI DETACHMENT PENTAGON LTC Joaquim D Martins LTC Donald York 16 Aug 78 - Present 1 Jul 76 - 15 Aug 78 US ARMY COMBINED RESEARCH DETACHMENT LTC David E Crew 18 Dec 76 - Present USA INS COM CI DETACHt ENT DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCY LTC John L Bohach Jr MAJ Thomas R Johnson Acting LTC Bruce A Phinney 7 Aug 78 - Present 16 Jun 78 - 6 Aug 78 1 Jan 78 - 15 Jun 78 US ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND THREAT ANALYSIS CENTER COL Albert F P Jones BG James E Freeze 3 Oct 77 - Present 1 Oct 77 - 3 Oct 77 US ARMY IMAGERY INTERPRETATIOO CENTER LTC Marion Pinckney LTC Hayden B Peake 30 Dec 77 - 1 Jan 78 Aug 75 - 29 Dec 77 USA INSCOM DATA SYSTEMS ACTIVITY COL Danie 1 fitlore Jr MAJ Richard R Mercer 10 Jan 78 - Present 1 Jul 77 - 9 Jan 78 US ARMY CENTRAL SECURITY FACILITY LTC Charles T Grimes LTC Arland R Mitchell LTC Alton R Westrick LTC William E Pearce 11 17 17 19 US ARMY SIGNAL SECURITY ACTIVITY LTC Horace S Kelley Jr 18 Aug 75 - 1 Jan 78 US ARMY TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY LTC Richard T Kane 18 Jul 77 - Present US ARMY GARRISON ARLINGTON HALL STATION LTC Francis V Varallo LTC Ji1m1ie R Eckard LTC James D Neighbors 1 Jul 78 - Present 15 May 78 - 1 Jul 78 29 Dec 76 - 15 May 78 150 Sep Jul Jun Sep 78 78 78 77 - Present 10 Sep 78 16 Jul 78 16 Jun 78 APPEND X G Uni t Cornman de r Oates Served US ARMY GARRISON VINT HILL FARMS STATION COL John P Br 'n COL Richard H Benfer 12 May 78 - Present 3 Jan 77 - 11 May 78 151 i t o ' I' ' APPENDIX J TRAVIS TROPHY WINNERS Calendar Year Winner 1964 6988th US Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE 53d USASA Special Operations Command 1965 313th ASA Battalion Corps 1966 1st Radio company Fleet Marine Force C USASA NOMINEE USASA Training Center and School 1967 509th USASA Group 1968 6990th US Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE USASA Europe 1969 6994th US Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE 330th ASA Company 1970 USASA Field Station Udorn 1971 US Naval Security Group Activity Bremerhaven Gennany USASA NOMINEE USASA Field Station Vint Hill Fanns 1972 6916th US Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE USASA Field Station Udorn 1973 USASA Field Station Berlin 1974 US Naval Security Group Activity Misawa Japan USASA NOMINEE USASA Field Station Augsburg 1975 Consolidated Security Operations Center San Antonio USASA Field Station San Antonio 6993d US Air Force Security Squadron 1976 USASA Field Station Sobe 1977 470th Military Intelligence Group 155 - 160 GLOSSARY antiaircraft artillery access amendment refusal air base AB o o o o o A C ooooooo air-con di t i oni ng AC o o o o o o o alternating current ACC US Anny C0fll11unications Colll'lland ACES o Anny Continuing Education System ACofS o Assistant Chief of Staff acq acquisition ACSI Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence act actual actg acting actv o activity ADCSLOG o Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff Logistics ADM o Admiral admin adninistration ADP o automatic data processing ADT o active duty for training AF ooo aerial exploitation AF o o o Air Force USAF AFB o o o Air Force Base AFP annual funding program AFPDA Anny Force Planning Data and Assumption AFRED o oo Air Force readiness AFSS US Air Force Security Service AGAS Advanced GOODKIN Acquisition System AHR o annual historical report AHS Arlington Hall Station AICP alternate intercept collection plan AIG acting inspector general AIT o advanced individual training al tn o o alternative ALTROF alternate remote operating facility AMHA o Anny Management Headquarters Activity o amperes amps o analysis anal o annual ann o approved operating program AOP o appendix app o approved appr o Anny regulation AR ARM o o antiradiation missile o Anny readiness ARRED o o article art o o o Anny Training and Evaluation Program ARTEP AS oo o aerial surveillance MA MR 156 161 - _ GLOSSARY ASA o o o Anny Security Agency ASD MRA L o Assistant Secretary of Defense Manpower Reserve Affairs and Logistics asgd assigned ASI o additional skill identifier auth authorized AUTODIN o o automatic digital network avn o aviation BASOPS BEQ BG BITE BMC bn o BND o BOS o BRISMIS ' I o o o o oo o o o o o oo base operations bachelor enlisted quarters brigadier general built-in test equipment base maintenance contract battalion Bundesnachrichtendienst base operations British Military Liaison Mission CAA o Concepts Analysis Agency C P o oo control and processing CAP o o Career Advancement Program centralized assignment procedures CAT o o o o category ccF o o o US Anny Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility CCO o controlled collection objective CCP o o o o Consolidated Cryptologic Program CD o o combat development CDAA circular disposed antenna array cd r o o co111T1an de r CE o o o o o co111T1unications-electronics CEOI o o conmunications-electronics operating instructions CERCOM o o o US Arn Y Conmun1cat1ons and Electronics Materiel Readiness Co111T1an d CEWI o o o Combat Electronic Warfare Intelligence CFV o o o cavalry fighting vehicle CG coll'dTlanding general CGG o o Combined Group Gennany chan channel chap o o o chapter CHCSS o o Chief Central Security Service CI o o o o counterintelligence CI IA o Counterintelligence and Investigative Activities CIA o o o o Central Intelligence Agency CINCPAC oooo Commander in Chief Pacific CINCUSAREUR o o Corrmander in Chief US Anny Europe 157 162 GLOSSARY CINCUSSOUTHCOM civ o o CIVPER o o o CMA o o CMF CMT o CNO oo co o o COBE o o COF o o CofS oo COL o comd COMFAC o COMINT corrm o o o COMMZ o o COMPACT o o o COMSEC o COMUSFK o Cong o o o CONTIC contr o o o o CONUS o o o convl o o o COP o o COPA o o o o COSAGE o CPA o o o o o CPAR CPO o o CPPA CPT o CPU o o o o o o CRF o CRG o o CRITIC o o o CRITICOMM o CSA o CSC o CSF ooo CSG o o o CSJF o o CSM o o CSOC oo CSS o o o C01T1T1ander in Chief United States Southern Command civilian civilian personnel Collection Management Authority career management field comment Chief of Naval Operations company conmand operating budget estimate central operating facility Chief of Staff colonel command conmunications facility communications intelligence communication s communications zone Consolidation of Military Personnel Activities at Anny Installations communications security Corrmander US Forces Korea Congress Continental Intelligence Conmand contract Continental United States conventional collection objective priority Chief Office of Public Affairs computer program model central procurement activity collection processing analysis and reporting Civi 11 an Pe rs onne l Of fi ce Chief Plans Programs and Analysis captain central processing unit US Anny Central Records Facility Concept Review Group critical intelligence critical intelligence conmunications Chief of Staff US Anl Y Civil Service Conmi ss ion US Anny Central Security Facility cryptologic support group case study and justification folder cornnand sergeant major Consolidated Security Operations Center Central Security Service 158 163 - GLOSSARY CTA oo ooo common table of allowances CULT common user land transportation oo calendar year CY DA oooo DAMI-ISS DAMPL o I b 3 Per OJA 1 e Department of the Anny Office Symbol for SIGINT Division OACSI De artment of the Army Master Priority List - I Of ice Symbol for ODCSPER DA US Anny Materiel Development and Readiness Conmand DARCOM DCA Defense Cooperation Agreement Defense Communications Agency DCG deputy command1 ng genera 1 DCG-I Deputy Commanding General Intelligence DCG-SP Deputy Convnanding General Security and Production DCI o Director Counterintelligence DCII o Defense Central Index of Investigations ocs o o Deputy Chief of Staff Defense Corrmun1cat1ons system DCSADP o Deputy Chief of Staff Automatic Data Processing DCSCI o o o o Deputy Chief of Staff Counterintelligence DCSI o o Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence DCSITA oo Deputy Chief of Staff Intelligence and Threat Analysis DCSLOG o o o Deputy Chief of Staff Logistics DCSMIS Deputy Chief of Staff Management Information Systems DCSOPS Deputy Chief of Staff Operations DCSPER oo Deputy Chief of Staff Personnel DCSR D o Deputy Chief of Staff Research and Development DCSRDA Deputy Chief of Staff Research Development and Acquisition DCSRM o Deputy Chief of Staff for Resource Management DCSS o o Deputy Chief of Staff Systems DCSSEC o Deputy Chief of Staff Security DCSTEL o Deputy Chief of Staff Telecommunications DOR o Deputy Director for Research and Development NSA det o o detachment dev deve 1opmen t OF o o direction finding Disposition Form DA Fann 2496 DH o direct hi re DHOC o daily hours of coverage DI o deceot i an i ndi c ted OAPE ooo DI RCI OIRITA DIRNSA DIROPS DIS o div o o o o o oooo o o o o o o o Di rector Co unteri nte 1l i gence Director Intelligence and Threat Analysis Director National Security Agency Director of Operations Defense Investigative Service division 159 164 GLOSSARY OLAT OM oo Defense Language Aptitude Test o o deuts che mark OMA ooo Defense Mapping Agency DMZ demilitarized zone OOA o o o o o Defense Nuclear Agency 00D o o Department of Defense DS o o direct support DSA o Defense Security Agency Korea DSC o divisional support company DSE direct support element osscs o Defense Special Security Conmunications System osu o o direct support unit OT oo development testing DTG o o date-time group EAC o ECI o o ECOM o EEO o o o eff o ELINT o EMI o EMRA o engr o o enl ENTNAC EO o E-0 o o o equip o ERADCOM o ETS EUCOM o EUR EUSA eval o EW echelon above corps ECI Oivision E Systems Incorporated US Anny Electronics Conmand equal employment opportunity effective electronic intelligence electromagnetic interference US Army Electronics Materiel Readiness Activity engineer enlisted Entrance National Agency Check Executive Order equal opportunity electro-optics equipment US Anny Electronics Research and Development Conmand expiration tenn of service US European Command Europe Eighth US Anny evaluation electronic warfare FAD FAO o o o FAST oo FAT o o FBI o FEBA o o o o FGGM o FHMA Funding Authorization Document foreign area officer Field Assistance Support Team forward area training Federal Bureau of Investigation forward edge of the battle area Fort George G Meade family housing management account 160 165 - GLOSSARY fl d o field from field manual foreign national foreign national indirect hire field operating agency freedom of i nfonnat ion Freedom of Infonnation Act Freedom of Infonnation Center US Anny Forces Conlnand forces status report Federal Republic of Gennany field station Field Station Augsburg frequency shift keying field systems support division Foreign Science and Technology Center forti feet Foreign Technology Division o forward Federal Women's Program Federal Women's Program Manager fiscal year Five Year Defense Program o fm FM FN FNIH FOA FOi FOIA FOIC FORSCOM FORSTAT o FRG o FS FSA FSK FSSD FSTC Ft FTD o fwd FWP FWPM FY FYDP GCHQ o gen GHz GIPD o GO o GOJ o GOT o o gp GR o o GS o GSFG oo Government Communications Headquarters British general gigahertz General Intelligence Production Division general officeri general orders Government of Japan Government of Turkey group GUARDRAIL General Schedule-Civilian Employees Group of Soviet Forces Gennany HF ooo HFDF HFMG o o o oo HHC hist Hon o o Hq - o o HQDA HR high frequency high frequency direction finding high frequency modernization group headquarters and headquarters company historical honorable headq ua rte rs Headquarters Department of the Anny human relations 161 166 - GLOSSARY IBM o ATS IAW IBOP ICC ICF ICLT ICR IDA ident IOHS IFR o I FV o IG IGAR I IR o IMC MINT INSCOM 1nsp intel IOC IOSS IPF o Improved AG Tenninal System in accordance with International Business Machines o international balance of payments o Intelligence Coordination Center o intelligence contingency funds in-country language training intelligence collection requirement o initial denial authority o identify o intelligence data handling systems o instrument flight rules infantry fighting vehicle inspector general inspector general action requests Intelligence Infonnation Reports instrument meteorological conditions imagery intelligence US Arll Y Intelligence and Security Command inspected o intelligence o initial operational capability o Intelligence Organization and Stationing Study integrated processing facility intercept and position fixing o in-process review o prisoner of war interrogation o infra-redi 000 Intelligence Infonnati on Report o intelligence-related activity o Intelligence Reports Repository US Ar111Y Investigative Records Repository Individual Ready Reserve intelligence support detachment o intelligence and security support group o US Anny Intel 11 gence and Threat Analysis Center IPR IPW IR IRA IRR ISO o o ISSG TAC Jax o o JCS o o o o o o JFAP JRX oooo o JTF Jackson Joint Chiefs of Staff Japan Facilities Adjustment Program joint readiness exercise joint task force K thousand KATUSA o Korean Au9mentation to the US Army km o o o o o o kilometer s 162 - 167 - GLOSSARY oo limited access authority LACT o o oo large automated corrmunications terminal live environment training LET LFC LAFITE CLEAR 'LFP LEFOX PURPLE LFW o LAFINE WINE LHTA Letzlinger-Heide Training Area LIMDIS o o limited distribution LT lieutenant LTC o lieutenant colonel LTG oo lieutenant general 1tr o o letter LWood o o Fort Leonard Wood LWR o o local wage rate LAA oo mill ion o major command oo medium automated communications tenninal o military absentee in or attempting to go to a foreign country or embassy maint o maintenance MAIT o maintenance assistance and instruction team o major MAJ measurement and signals development requirements MASDR management by objectives MBO Military Construction Army MCA MOIR oo o Multidiscipline Intelligence Report MOPUP o oo Multidiscipline Peacetime Utilization Program MOW oo o o Military District of Washington MG major general mgr o manager mgt management MHz o megahertz MI o mi 1i ta ry i nte 11 i gen ce Mil o military MILPERCEN o US Anny Military Personnel Center MIL SPEC o military specification MIS o o o Management lnfonnation System KlA ooo Memorandum of Agreement P lBDES mobilization designee KlO Ministry of Defense model MOS o military occupat i ona 1 speci a1ty KlU oo o Memorandum of Understanding MP military police MPA o Mil i ta ry Pe rs onne 1 Army MRA l o Manpower Reserve Affairs and Logistics M ooo MACOM MACT MAFOR - 163 168 - GLOSSARY msg Mt o MTOE NAC o natl o NATO o NCO o NCRJ oo NCW o o NF o NOFORN NSA oo NSACSS NSG OACSI message o mountain Modification Table of Organization and Equipment o o o o o o National Agency Check national North Atlantic Treaty Organization noncorrrnissioned officer NSA Representative Japan non codeword NOFORN o not releasable to foreign nationals o National Security Agency National Security Agency Central Security Service Naval Security Group o o obj o OCONUS OCSA o ODCI ODCSADP o ODCSCI o o ODCSITA ODCSLOG o ODCSOPS o ODCSPER ODCSS ODCSSEC ODCSTEL OE o o o DESO o o o off o OJCS OMA o OPA OPCON OPLAN opn 1 o o o o OPPA o OPREP o o ops o OPSCOMM o o OPSEC OB o Office of Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence order of battle objective outside continental United States Office Chief of Staff US Army Office Director Counterintelligence Office Deputy Chief of Staff Automatic Data Processing Office Deputy Chief of Staff Counterintelligence Office Deputy Chief of Staff Intelligence and Threat Office Deputy Chief of Staff Logistics Office Deputy Chief of Staff Operations Office Deputy Chief of Staff Personnel Office Deputy Chief of Staff Systems Office Deputy Chief of Staff Security Office Deputy Chief of Staff Telecorranunications organizational effectiveness organizational effectiveness staff officers officer Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Operation and Maintenance Army other procurement Armv operational control operation plan ope rat i ona 1 Office Plans Programs and Analysis Operations Report operations operations corrrnunication operations security 164 l 69 GLOSSARY ORR o Operational Readiness Report OSD o Office of the Secretary of Defense OSG o o Operational Security Group OT o o o o o o o operational test Privacy Act PA PACOM o Pacific Command PBG Program Budget Guidance PCM o oo punched card machine PCS pennanent change of station PE oo o program element pers personnel PHOTINT photographic intelligence PI Philippine Islands PO o pennanent orders Privacy Office POL o o o petroleum oils and lubricants POM preparation of overseas movement units PRC People's Republic of China prod o production prog programmed prov o o o prov is ion a1 PTR o Plans Training and Reserve Affairs PU o peacetime utilization PUP o Peacetime Utilization Program qtr qtrly quarter ly R D ooo RATEL o o RC o RCF o RCP o oo RCPAC o research and development radio telephone Reserve Component remote collection facility resource change proposal US Anny Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center reports control symbol research development and acquisition recreation US Readiness Conmand Readiness Training for US Anny Intelligence Resources reenlistments rehabilitate d reimbursable report review RCS RDA recr REDCOM o REDTRAIN o o reenl o rehab o o reimb rept o o o o o rev 165 170 - GLOSSARY RF o o radio frequency Rf ROF o ROK o ROPG rqr RRG RREO Resource Management Officer remote operating facility Republic of Korea Remote operations Planning Group required Requirement Review Group race relations equal opportunity SACT SAM o SAO o SBI o SCA SCI o SCP o scty o SOL o SDO o o SE ooo SF oo SGS o SGT o SI o SIC sig o SIGAD o o SIGINT o o o SIGSEC oo SIR o o SJA o SLAR o o SOTA o o SOUTHCOM SP o o o sp o o spt o o SQT sr o SSC SSG o SSL o ooo SSM oo o oooo o sso subj o small automated conrnunications tenninal surface-to-air missile Special Activities Office Special Background Investigation Service Cryptologic Agency sensitive compartmented intelligence system concept paper security Signals Development Laboratory special disbursing officer subelement San Francisco Secretary of the General Staff sergeant special intelligence security identification credentials signal SIGINT Activity Designator signal intelligence signal security serious incident reporting Staff Judge Advocate side-look1ng a1rborne radar SIGINT Operational Tasking Authority United States Southern Command specialist special support skill qualification test senior Staff Support Cells special security group special study group staff sergeant single station locator surface-to-surface missile special security officer subject 166 171 GLOSSARY subor si an suppl supv svcs SWL sys o o o o o ooo o o o TAADS o T-Berg TACREPS TAGO TAIC TAREX TB TCT TOA o TOY tel tng TOE tot TR TRAOOC trans trf TSA ooo TSARCOM o TUSLOG tvl subordinate sunmary supplement supervisor services US Anny Signals Warfare Laboratory system The Aney Authorization Ooci anents System Tuefelsberg tactical reports The Adjutant General's Office Theater Army Intelligence Conmand exploitation target technical bulletin tactical co111T1anders tenninal tables of distribution and allowances o temporary duty telephone trainin table s of organization and equipment total TRACER ROUND US Anny Training and Doctrine Convnand transportation o transferred US Anny Technical Support Activity Command Troop Support Aviation and Readiness o The United States Logistics Group travel o oo o o o us o USA o o o o USACC USACSF ooooo USACSG o o o USAFS o o USAFSS USAG o o o USAGO o UFO UFR UHF UK UMP unintentional frequency deviation unfinanced requirement ultra high frequency United Kingdom Upward Mobility Program United States United States Army US Anny Conmunications Command US Army Central Security Facility US Anny CINCPAC Support Group US Anny Field Sta ti on US Air Force Security Service US Aney Garrison US Army Garrison Okinawa 167 172 GLOSSARY USAINTA USAIAREES o US Anny Intelligence Agency o US Anny Institute for Advanced Russian and East European Studies USAINSCOM oooo US Anny Intelligence and Security Command USAINSCOMDETNSA US Anny Intelligence and Security Command Detachment NSA USAIRR o US Anny Investigative Records Repository USAISD o o US Anl Y Inte 1li gence Schoo 1 o Devens USAITAC o o US Army Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center USAR o o US Anny Reserve USAREUR o US Anny Europe USARJ US Anny Japan USASA o US Anny Security Agency USASATC S US Anny Security Agency Training Center and School USASCH US Anny Support Collllland Hawaii US COB o o o US Commander Berlin USDH o o o United States direct hire USFJ o o o United States Forces Japan USFK o o o United States Forces Korea USMLMCINCGSFG US Military Liaison Mission to Conmander in Chief Group of Soviet Forces Ge nnany USSID o o United States Siqnal Intelliqence Directive USSOUTHCOM o o United States Southern Conmand USSR o o United Soviet Socialist Republic USSS o United States SIGINT System o Vice Chief of Staff US Anny VCSA very high frequencyi Vint Hill Farms VHF VHFS o o o o Vint Hill Fanns Station o visual meteorological conditions VMC o volume vol o o vocational technical VOTEC oo with o o Western Pacific WESTPAC WNINTEL o o Warning Notice-sensitive intelligence sources and methods involved o o warrant officer WO oo w 168 l73 This document is from the holdings of The National Security Archive Suite 701 Gelman Library The George Washington University 2130 H Street NW Washington D C 20037 Phone 202 994-7000 Fax 202 994-7005 nsarchiv@gwu edu