•• • •• • • Q 0 0 • - - 0 0 0 ' 0 O'lQ I 0 •• ' 2 ' ' ' f3 oa 0 0 0 ------ ·---- • - 0 -- • • • 00 ----- I I 0 C 0 • I • th 1 a TUMS • • - • • • • Reason bl ct eve ·50 power -ev l ce_ - tts - 'M · - C 0 • • • • J v-e ag of me sur d high val es s 2 ere I Average of m es s1 1red • ow val e • • s 5 highest pe Singl • • aa Secon Project BIZAlmE findings now begin to as Sw 1 1 · ea ollcv • • • • 1 • I -- I I • • I I • • • 3 • • - '- ' easo a ble certa_ty that prono mced beha oral ef-Pects e d c · eTmP t an b - · - od - ced rirnates by a modul a ted c ar · e -er s gnal of approximat ly 5Mtl cm 2 ene gy dens· ty I wowi - co t s ob ervatio to e establi sned as fact t we· e C' l't I d · by -dependent la bor tory • • • • • • I • 2 • I ugg stive evidence that t e beaavi o ra - e f'f e ct ob e · ed s e to the mod ation f ea ture and not to the ene -gy bear · g a fre 11e-ney • This very -triguJ D g end 11 19orte nt ob e •a io· · one an 1 1 1 11c 1 J mi st be p11rsued • • Sugge s v ev i den ce that · d be aV'l oral e ct s _ er o ' ' ecrernent can be p oduced · pr· · es by a ula ed ca r signal of Mil c m 2 ene gy density· - s -IC I n f'o ces · o o degree t e not o that e rnodula t on ea tu re s e J 'i 'PO e ernent 'because lMil cm2 energy densi y s really te o Tl · s wa _ also a s-gl observation and s ould ce cw- - - - • • • _· • _ • • • o sll'lg e - e ta- 0 bservations ct ex-co - · e · or e a vely short periods of im one a O•O • CJ J 2 SJld one O•008 · · 2 energy dens ty o th _ mct' 1 late ce e s gtia o ce no behavio ef ects • 1 • I I I • • • • • 5 • • Recovery · o occ11rred hi e 0 008 MtJ crn2 en gy ect o · to a _ uo • ly expo e o ensi y - 0 • • • • • • • • • • •• • 00 0 a 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 cc 0 OJ 0 0 Ill o 0 - - - • u a ' ' • o 1il • - Ill I • 0 0 C Ill 0 • • • 0 • --• - - 0 I • • • • J - • - _______ ________ I • I • I • 1 ---- • -- I • l - • • 0 0 • 'I 0 - 0 o -0 0 -o I - _ 0 0 0 _ 0 7 - io - • l J 0 0 0 ' • •• ' 0 0 0 oo ' 0 'l 0 0 --·-- - • • • • •I - - ------·--- - - - - -- - ----- - - - - · • r Third the implications ot these fiDd i Dgs for persons exposed Y Tm are that as far as power levels are concerned heir exposure is thrEE orders of magnitude lower than the levels at '1lich behavioral effEcts were observed in Project BIZARRE Recover from these same effects were observed in one exper1 ment while the animal • ra s exposed to aJ ProYi mately the same energy density and same modula tion a s that or TU1 15• Therefore I feel confident in stating that at the power level s reported or TUMS persons exposed a re at no risk o inj'l cry Concerning the new suggestive evidence that the modulation f ature of the earner frequency or perhaps some synergistic effect o-f both t ogether proc uces temporary behavioral ef'fect in pr1rnates makes a ny statez ient about · similar effects not being produced in h unans by the S signal somewhat less certain than before but a Jl the s e very 1nl1kely indeed _ Fourth for the recor✓it should be noted that all the posit ive J finci ngs of Project BIZARRE were a chi eved a t one half an order of vagnitude bel w the accepted U S sta nd aTd for sa fe exposure • ' I I I 1 • I ' I - ' ''-1 • II I • • - ' •I I · - • • • Joe Johnston • n • • • • - I • • • • • • •• • • • • • • I • • • • • • • • • - • • • 0 • • • • • • • • • '- • • - ' • • • • • • • • - -• • • I • • • ✓-• I 00 O O 0 0 C 0 0 - • • 0 _ C G 0 0 0 Q 0 C 0 oo • __ • ____ _ - -- - 11 1 J o o r J • • • J - 0 ' J ' 0 J - 0 • I - • 2 • - • • PHOT_ CQPY FROM GERALD F RD LIBRARY ---- __ - _ - - - --- ---- - --- -- • - - --- - - -- - - - - - -